Journals / Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

In Patients with Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus, Should the First Approach be Crystallised Phenol or Limberg Flap?

Nüks Pilonidal Sinüs Hastalarında İlk Yaklaşım Kristalize Fenol mü, Limberg Flep mi Olmalı?

Pages
112–116
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the mean hospital stay was 2.05±0.75 days in the Limberg group, all patients were discharged on the same day in the crystallised phenol group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In our study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of Limberg flap and crystallised phenol treatments applied to patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus disease who were treated with the surgical excision Limberg flap technique and crystallised phenol method in our hospital General Surgery Clinic between 2017 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the mean hospital stay was 2.05±0.75 days in the Limberg group, all patients were discharged on the same day in the crystallised phenol group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In our study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of Limberg flap and crystallised phenol treatments applied to patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus. Method: Patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus disease who were treated with the surgical excision Limberg flap technique and crystallised phenol method in our hospital General Surgery Clinic between 2017 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were assessed according to age, gender, hospital stay, smoking, infection, return-to-work period and recurrence rates. Results: A total of 25 patients who underwent Limberg flap treatment due to recurrent disease and 32 patients who were treated with the phenol method were identified retrospectively. Patients with missing data were excluded, and 40 patients were included in the study. In all, 72.5% of the patients were male. The mean age of the Limberg group was 25.25±6.12, and that of the crystallised phenol group was 24.60±6.11. While the mean hospital stay was 2.05±0.75 days in the Limberg group, all patients were discharged on the same day in the crystallised phenol group (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda nüks pilonidal sinüslü hastalara uygulanan Limberg flep ve kristalize fenol tedavilerinin etkinliğini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntem: Hastanemiz genel cerrahi kliniğinde, 2017-2019 tarihleri arasında cerrahi eksizyon Limberg flep tekniği ve kristalize fenol yöntemi ile tedavi edilen nüks pilonidal sinüs hastalığı tanısı alan hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olgular yaş, cinsiyet, hastanede kalış süresi, sigara, enfeksiyon, işe dönüş süresi ve nüks oranlarına göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Nüks hastalık nedeniyle işlem yapılan hasta dosyaları arasından Limberg flep uygulanan 25 hasta ve fenol uygulaması yapılan 32 hasta geriye dönük tespit edildi. Eksik verileri olan hastalar dışlandı ve 40 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların %72,5’i erkekti. Limberg grubunun yaş ortalaması 25,25±6,12, kristalize fenol grubunun ise 24,60±6,11 idi. Limberg grubunda hastanede kalış süresi 2,05±0,75 gün iken, kristalize fenol grubunda tüm olgular aynı gün taburcu edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, M., YAVUZ, Y. (2022). In Patients with Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus, Should the First Approach be Crystallised Phenol or Limberg Flap?. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 112–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/634558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Sarı R, Akbaba S, Gündoğdu RH, Yazıcıoğlu MÖ. Comparison of VY Flap and Limberg Flap Methods in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2019;29:69-74.
  2. Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:3e8. Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Duzgun SA, Ucar BI, Alparslan Yumun HN, Mestan M. Crystallized phenol application and modified Limberg flap procedure in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: A comparative retrospective study. Asian J Surg 2016;39:172-177.
  3. Dag A, Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Sozutek A, Gundogdu R. Phenol procedure for pilonidal sinus disease and risk factors for treatment failure. Surgery 2012;151:113-117.
  4. Tavassoli A, Noorshafiee S, Nazarzadeh R. Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap. Int J Surg 2011;9:343-346.
  5. Gülpınar K, Pampal A, Ozis SE, Kuzu MA. Non-operative therapy for pilonidal sinus in adolescence: crystallised phenol application, ”report of a case”. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013. pii: bcr2012008382. Ölmez A, Kayaalp C, Aydın C. Treatment of pilonidal disease by combination of pit excision and phenol application. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17:201-206.
  6. Ataallah W, Coşkun Ş, Coşkun M, Solmaz A, Yegen C, Gencosmanoglu R. The ımpact of crystalline phenol application as a minimal ınvasive treatment modality for pilonidal sinus disease. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2015;25:28-33.
  7. Sit M, Aktas G, Yilmaz EE. Comparison of the three surgical flap techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. Am Surg 2013;79:1263e1268. Girgin M, Kanat BH. The results of a one-time crystallized phenol application for pilonidal sinus disease. Indian J Surg 2014;76:17e20. Kayaalp C, Olmez A, Aydın C, Piskin T, Kahraman L. Investigation of one-time phenol application for pilonidal disease. Med Princ Pract 2010;19:212-215.
  8. Dogru O, Camci C, Aygen E, Girgin M, Topuz O. Pilonidalsinus treated with crystallized phenol: an eight-year experience.Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1934-1938.
  9. Aygen E, Arslan K, Dogru O, Basbug M, Camci C. Crystallized phenol in nonoperative treatment of previously operated, recurrent pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:932-935.
  10. Ardelt M, Dittmar Y, Kocijan R, et al. Microbiology of the infected recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Int Wound J. 2014.
  11. Ergin A, Sipahi M, Talih T. A Different Approach to the Treatment Ofpreviously Operated Recurrent Pilonidal Disease. Bozok Med J 2018;8:113-116.
  12. Al-Khayat H, Al-Khayat H, Sadeq A, Gr