Journals / Türk Klinik Biyokimya Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Immunoturbidimetric and Electrochemiluminescence Methods for Ferritin Measurement

Ferritin Ölçümü için İmmunoturbidimetrik ve Elektrokemilüminesans Yöntemler

Pages
51–57
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Although a strong positive correlation (r=0.999; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The measurement of serum ferritin is used as a reliable and noninvasive method for the monitoring of iron stores.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The 109 blood samples were analyzed by immunoturbidimetric and electrochemiluminescent method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Although a strong positive correlation (r=0.999; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The measurement of serum ferritin is used as a reliable and noninvasive method for the monitoring of iron stores. There are many different methods for the ferritin measurement. However, the immunoturbidimetric method that having the less cost and possibility of the simultaneously ferritin measurement with other parameters is more useful than electrochemiluminescent method. Thus, we aimed to compare the results of immunoturbidimetric and electrochemiluminescent method. Material and Methods: The 109 blood samples were analyzed by immunoturbidimetric and electrochemiluminescent method. The comparison study was performed according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute EP9-A3 protocol. The bias between two methods was evaluated according to acceptable systematic error limit. Diagnostic agreement according to the reference value was analyzed by the Kappa test. Results: Although a strong positive correlation (r=0.999; p

Özet

Amaç: Serum ferritin ölçümü, demir depolarının izlenmesi için güvenilir ve non-invaziv bir yöntem olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ferritin ölçümü için birçok farklı yöntem bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, daha az maliyet ile diğer parametrelerin eş zamanlı ölçüm olanağına sahip immunoturbidimetrik yöntem, elektrokemilüminesans yönteme göre daha kullanışlıdır. Bu nedenle,immunoturbidimetrik yöntem ile elektrokemiluminesans yöntem sonuçlarının karşılaştırılmasını amaçladık. Materyal ve Metod: 109 kan örneği immünoturbidimetrik ve elektrokemiluminesans yöntem ile analiz edildi. Karşılaştırma çalışması, Klinik Laboratuar Standartları Enstitüsü EP9-A3 protokolüne uygun olarak gerçekleştirildi. İki yöntem arasındaki bias kabul edilebilir sistematik hata sınırına göre değerlendirildi. Referans değerlere göre tanısal uyum Kappa testi ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: İmmünoturbidimetrik ve elektrokemiluminesans yöntem sonuçları arasında güçlü pozitif korelasyon (r=0.999; p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEK, D., İNCE, F. D., AVCI, R., ARI, E. M., ZEYTİNLİ, M., ELLİDAĞ, H. Y. (2022). Immunoturbidimetric and Electrochemiluminescence Methods for Ferritin Measurement. Türk Klinik Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 51–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/634411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bushnell FK. A guide to primary care iron deficiency anemia. Nurse 1992;17(II):13069
  2. Adamson JW. Iron deficiency and other hypoproliferative anemias. In: Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, Braunwald E, Hauser SL, Jameson JL (editors). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 16th ed. USA: McGraw-Hill Companies; 2005;586- 92
  3. Tam KF, Lao TT. Hemoglobin and red cell indices correlated with serum ferritin concentration in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93:427-31
  4. Byg KE, Milman N, Hansen S, Agger AO. Serum Ferritin is a Reliable, Non-invasive Test for Iron Status in Pregnancy: Comparison of Ferritin with Other Iron Status Markers in a Longitudinal Study on Healthy Pregnant Women; Erythropoiesis. Hematology 2000;5:319-25
  5. Blackmore S, Hamilton M, Lee A, Worwood M, Brierley M, Heath A, et al. Automated immunoassay methods for ferritin: recovery studies to assess traceability to an international standard. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46(10):1450-7
  6. Budd JR, Durham AP, Gwise TE, Iriarte B, Kallner A, Magari R, et al. Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples, EP09-A3; Approved Guideline-3rd ed. Wayne,PA, USA. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute 2013
  7. Carey RN, Durham AP, Hauck WW, Kallner A, Kondratovich MV, Middle JG, et al. User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness, EP15- A3; Approved Guideline-3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2014
  8. Horowitz G, Altaie S, Boyd CJ, Ceriotti F, Garg U, Horn P, et al. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory, C28- A3; Approved Guideline-3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008
  9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1):159-74
  10. Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR, Meis PJ, Moawad A, et al. Plasma ferritin, prematüre rupture of membranes, and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179(6):1599- 604
  11. Sucak GT: Hipokrom Mikrositer Anemiler. İlicin G, Ünal S, Biberoğlu K, Akalın S, Süleymanlar G (editor) Temel İç Hastalıkları
  12. Cilt Güneş Kitapevi Ankara 1996; 1184-90
  13. Kotajima N, Ishizaka M, Oshitani S, Fukumura Y, Ushijima Y, Murakami M. Latex agglutination test for ferritin measurement. J Clin Lab Anal 2003; 17(6):223-8
  14. Zhang X, Lu Y, Ma L, Peng Q, Qin X, Li S. A comparison study between two analyzers for determining serum ferritin. Clin Lab 2015;61(1- 2):