SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Klinik Biyokimya Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The Use of Estimated Average Glucose Value (eAG) in "Diabetes Mellitus"

Tahmini Ortalama Glukoz Değerinin (eAG) "Diabetes Mellitus"da Kullanımı

Sezer UYSAL
Gülsüm Feyza ALTAŞ
Pages
80–88
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hemoglobin concentrations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The use of glycemic markers in the follow-up of Diabetes Mellitus is important to prevent the development of complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is more stable and exhibits glucose status of 8-12 weeks, while fasting plasma glucose (APG) reflects the current situation, varies from day to day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hemoglobin concentrations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The use of glycemic markers in the follow-up of Diabetes Mellitus is important to prevent the development of complications. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is more stable and exhibits glucose status of 8-12 weeks, while fasting plasma glucose (APG) reflects the current situation, varies from day to day. Therefore, HbA1c is a reliable control mechanism. However, the difference in unit between HbA1c and APG can lead to confusion. To eliminate this condition "Estimated Average Glucose (eAG)" is reported in the same unit with APG, calculated from HbA1c. In our study, we investigated whether it is beneficial to use the eAG. Material and Methods: In the retrospective study, 690 patients with 75 g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) were chosen from the laboratory information system. Hemoglobin concentrations

Özet

Amaç: Diabetes Mellitus izleminde glisemik belirteçlerin kullanımı komplikasyon gelişiminin önlenmesi açısından önemlidir. Günden güne değişkenlik göstererek anstabil bir belirteç olan açlık plazma glukozu (APG) anlık durumu yansıtırken glike hemoglobin (HbA1c) daha stabil olup 8-12 haftalık glukoz durumunu göstermektedir. Bu yüzden takipte HbA1c güvenilir bir kontrol mekanizmasıdır. Ancak HbA1c ve APG arasında birim farklılığının olması karışıklığa neden olabilir. Bu durumu ortadan kaldırmak için APG ile aynı birimde raporlanan "tahmini ortalama açlık glukozu" (estimated Avarege Glucose, eAG) HbA1c'den hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmamızda eAG kullanımının faydalı olup olmadığını araştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yapılan retrospektif çalışmada 75 gr Oral Glukoz Tolerans Testi (OGTT) olan 690 hastanın (Non-Diabetes Mellitus, n=141: Prediabetes Mellitus, n=415: Diabetes Mellitus, n=134) sonucu laboratuvar bilgi sisteminden alındı. Hemoglobin sonucu olan 234 hastada hemoglobin konsantrasyonu

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, S., ALTAŞ, G. F. (2022). The Use of Estimated Average Glucose Value (eAG) in "Diabetes Mellitus". Türk Klinik Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 80–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/634400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. WHO. Definition,Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. 1999. p. 1–59
  2. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2017. 2017;40 (January) (Suppl. 1):P11-P24
  3. Rodriguez-Segade S, Garcia JR, Garcoa-Lopez JM, Gude F, Casanueva FF, RS-Alonso S, et al. Impact of mean cell hemoglobin on Hb A1c-defined glycemia status. Clin Chem. 2016;62(12):1570–8
  4. Genuth S, Alberti KGMM, Bennett P, Buse J, DeFronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3160–7
  5. Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği. Diabetes Mellitus Ve Komplikasyonlarının Tanı, Tedavi Ve İzlem Kılavuzu. 2015
  6. Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Tennill AL, Connolly S, Hanson S. Effects of Sample Storage Conditions on Glycated Hemoglobin Measurement: Evaluation of Five Different High Performance Liquid Chromatography Methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Feb;9(1):36–42
  7. Home PD. Special Article – For Debate HbA1c: the case for using estimated average glucose (eAG). Diabet Med. 2008;895–8
  8. Stratton IM. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Bmj. 2000;321(7258):405–12
  9. Ac H, Brick JC, Derr RL. A Randomized Comparison of the Terms Estimated Average Glucose Versus Hemoglobin A1C. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35(4):596– 602
  10. Harwell TS, Dettori N, McDowall JM, Quesenberry K, Priest L, Butcher MK, et al. Do Persons With Diabetes Know Their (AIC) Number? Diabetes Educ. 2002 Jan 1;28(1):99–105
  11. Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer H-M, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE. Defining the Relationship Between Plasma Glucose and HbA 1c. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):275–8
  12. Report of a WHO scientific group. Nutritional anaemias. World Health Organization - Technical Report Series. No
  13. Geneva; 1968
  14. Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ, et al. Translating the A1C Assay Into Estimated Average Glucose Values. Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug 1;31(8):1473–8
  15. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, Salman S, Salman F, Uygur S, et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes Care. 2002 Sep;25(9):1551–6
  16. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, Matsushita K, Wagenknecht L, Pankow J, et al. Glycated Hemoglobin, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Risk in Nondiabetic Adults. N Engl J Med. 2010;9(4):800- 11
  17. Satman I