SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2001 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 7

Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure parameters in patients with white coat hypertension versus normotensive subjects and untreated hypertensive patients

Beyaz önlük hipertansiyonunda elde edilen ambulatuvar kan basıncı değerlerinin normotansif bireyler ve tedavi edilmemiş hipertansiflerle karşılaştırılması

Halis DÖRTLEMEZ
Uğur HODOĞLUGİL
Deniz BARLAS
Mert CEYHAN
Hakan ZENGİL
Mustafa CEMRİ
Pages
426–429
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that white coat hypertension may be of clinical importance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:White coat hypertension is defined to be present when an individual is hypertensive in the physician's office, but normotensive when their blood pressure (BP) is measured with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out on 96 hypertensive patients (57 F, 39 M; mean age: 51±1.3 years) and 132 normotensive subjects (101 F, 31 M; mean age 41.4±1.0) according to office measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that white coat hypertension may be of clinical importance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

White coat hypertension is defined to be present when an individual is hypertensive in the physician's office, but normotensive when their blood pressure (BP) is measured with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). To assess the clinical importance of the white coat hypertension, we aimed to compare ambulatory blood pressure parameters in patients with white coat hypertension versus normotensive subjects and untreated hypertensive patients. The study was carried out on 96 hypertensive patients (57 F, 39 M; mean age: 51±1.3 years) and 132 normotensive subjects (101 F, 31 M; mean age 41.4±1.0) according to office measurements. After office BP measurements were recorded 3-4 times, ABPM was applied for 48 hours to each subject. We calculated 48-hour of, day and night mean load (proportion of elevated BP over a certain limit for a period) values for systolic and diastolic BPs. Of the 96 hypertensive patients, 20 (20.8%) had white coat hypertension (12 F, 8 M; mean age: 52.9±3.7 years) and 76 had sustained hypertension. Although 48-hour day and night mean and load values for systolic and diastolic BPs in patients with white coat hypertension were significantly lower than in those with sustained hypertension, they usere significantly higher than in normotensive subjects. These results suggest that white coat hypertension may be of clinical importance.

Özet

Beyaz önlük hipertansiyonu (BÖH) hekim ofisinde yapılan ilk muayenelerinde sistolik (SKB) ve/veya diyastolik kan basınçları (DKB) yüksek bulunan fakat daha sonra ambulatuvar kan basıncı monitörleri (AKBM) ile yapılan ölçümlerde değerleri normal saptanan kişiler için kullanılan bir tanımdır. Bu çalışmaya, son 10 gün içinde herhangi bir antihipertansif ilaç kullanmayan, diabetes mellitus, kardiyak veya diğer sistemik hastalığı olmayan, ofis ölçümlerine göre klinik hipertansif (KHT, SKB$geq$140 ve/veya DKB$geq$90 mmHg) olan 96 kişi (57K, 39E; yaş ort: 51.3±1.3) ile ofis ölçümlerine göre normotansif (NT, SKB

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖRTLEMEZ, H., HODOĞLUGİL, U., BARLAS, D., CEYHAN, M., ZENGİL, H., CEMRİ, M. (2022). Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure parameters in patients with white coat hypertension versus normotensive subjects and untreated hypertensive patients. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 7, 426–429. https://ajindex.com/articles/634009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. White WB: Ambulatory blood prcssure and target organ involvement in hypertension. Clin lnvest Med 1991;14:224-3 2. Fagard R, Staessen J, Thijs L: Twenty-fourhour blood pressure measurements: analytic aspects. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1 (suppl ı ):23-5 3. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Boldrini F, et al: Variability between current definitions of "normal" ambulatory blood pressure. Implications in the assessment of white coat hypertension. Hypertension 1992;20:555-62 4. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Bor gioni C, et al: White-coat hyperıe on. Laneel I 996;348: I 444- 5. S. Khattar RS, Senior R, Lahini A: Cardiovascular outcome in white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension. Circulation 1 998;98: 1892-7 6. Strandberg TE, Salomaa V: White coat e ffect, blood pressure and mortality in men: prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J 2000;21: 1714-8 7. Staessen JA, Bieniaszewski L, O'Brien ET, et a l: What is normal blood pressure on ambulatory monitoring Nephrol D ial Transplanı 1996;11:24 1-5 8. West J N, Townend JN, Davies P, et al: Effect of unrestricted acıiv ty on accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure measurement. Hypertension. 1991;18:593 9. Prisant LM, Carr AA: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic left ventricular wall thickness and mass. Am J Hypertens 1990;3:81 10. Glen SK, Elliott HL, Curzio JL, et al: White-coat hypertension as cause of cardiovascular dysrunction. Laneel 1996;348:654-7 11. Appel LJ, Stason WB: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure self-measurement in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Ann Intern Med I 993; 118:867-82 12. Pickering TG: Clinical aspects of twentyfour-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1:17-21 13. White WB, Mansoor GA: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Current Opinions in Nephrology and Hypertension 1993;2:928.