SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2008 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

European national society cardiovascular journals. Background, rationale and mission statement of the “editors’ club”

Kurt HUBER
Mario IVANUSA
Joseph ELIAS
Halima BENJELLOUM
Olaf RODEVAND
Hugo ECTOR
İzet MAZİC
Rumiana TARNOVSKA
Fernando ALFONSO
Giuseppe AMBROSIO
Fausto J. PINTO
Ernst E. VAN DER WALL
Anesti KONDILI
Djamaleddine NIBOUCHE
Karlen ADAMYAN
Vladimir STANEK
Jorgen VIDEBAEK
Mohamed HAMED
A
Pages
207–213
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

HUBER, K., IVANUSA, M., ELIAS, J., BENJELLOUM, H., RODEVAND, O., ECTOR, H., MAZİC, İ., TARNOVSKA, R., ALFONSO, F., AMBROSIO, G., PINTO, F. J., WALL, E. E. V. D., KONDILI, A., NIBOUCHE, D., ADAMYAN, K., STANEK, V., VIDEBAEK, J., HAMED, M., A, A. (2022). European national society cardiovascular journals. Background, rationale and mission statement of the “editors’ club”. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 207–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/633544

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Goodman N, Bijnens B, Van de Werf F. The European Heart Journal: a European journal with a global impact in cardiovascular medicine. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1382-4
  2. Piper HM, Martinson EA, Opthof T. The hills and valleys of an impact factor. Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:175
  3. Piper HM, Garcia-Dorado D, Martinson EA. Readers’ choice: hot papers downloaded in 2006. Cardiovasc Res 2007;73:619-22
  4. European Society of Cardiology. [homepage on the Internet]. Available from:
  5. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med 1997;336:309-15. Available from:
  6. Council of Science Editors. [homepage on the Internet]. Editorial Policy Committee (2005–2006), Council of Science Editors. CSE’s White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Available from: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_ policies/white_paper.cfm
  7. World Association of Medical Editors. [homepage on the Internet]. Available from:
  8. Alfonso F, Bermejo J, Segovia J. New recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Shifting focus: from uniformity in technical requirements to bioethical considerations Rev Esp Cardiol 2004;57:592-3
  9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4
  10. García-Dorado D, Schlüter KD, Martinson EA, Piper HM. Which papers are more interesting to the readers of Cardiovascular Research? Information from download monitoring. Cardiovasc Res 2005;65:1-5
  11. Relman AS. The Ingelfinger rule. N Engl J Med 1981; 305:824-6
  12. Hildner FJ. Redundant publication. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;42:111-2
  13. DeMaria AN. Duplicate publication: insights into the essence of a medical journal. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:516-7
  14. Relman AS. Publish or perish-or both. N Engl J Med 1977;297:724-5
  15. Hildner FJ. Ethical issues in cardiovascular publications: observations during 25 years as an editor. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;60:202-7
  16. Alfonso F, Bermejo J, Segovia J. Duplicate or redundant publication: can we afford it? [Article in Spanish] Rev Esp Cardiol 2005;58:601-4
  17. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used to evaluate research. BMJ 1997; 314:498-502
  18. Smith R. Unscientific practice flourishes in scien