SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2015 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

coronary angiography: Is occupation a factor? Transradial yaklaşımla koroner anjiyografi yapılması planlanan hastalarda radial arter çaplarının tahmin edilmesi: Meslek farklılık yaratır mı?

Prediction of radial artery diameter in candidates for transradial coronary angiography: Is occupation a factor?

Duygun AYKAN ALTINTAŞ
Ahmet Oğuz ARSLAN
Şükrü ÇELİK
Ezgi KALAYCIOĞLU
Tayyar GÖKDENİZ
Engin HATEM
Ahmet Çağrı AYKAN
Pages
450–456
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Radial artery diameter was correlated with wrist cir- cumference (r=0.539, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiog- raphy is a popular alternative approach to transfemoral coro- nary angiography due to the infrequent occurrence of access site complications such as bleeding, hematoma and pseudoa- neursym formation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 222 consecutive patients who underwent TRA due to suspected stable coronary artery dis- ease.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Radial artery diameter was correlated with wrist cir- cumference (r=0.539, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiog- raphy is a popular alternative approach to transfemoral coro- nary angiography due to the infrequent occurrence of access site complications such as bleeding, hematoma and pseudoa- neursym formation. However, not all patients are suitable for TRA. This study aimed to determine the predictors of radial artery diameter in patients who are candidates for TRA. Methods: The study included 222 consecutive patients who underwent TRA due to suspected stable coronary artery dis- ease. Radial artery diameter was evaluated prior to the proce- dure using B-mode ultrasonography. Results: Radial artery diameter was correlated with wrist cir- cumference (r=0.539, p

Özet

Amaç: Transradial yaklaşımla (TRY) koroner anjiyografi fe- moral yoldan anjiyografinin popüler bir alternatifidir. Kanama, hematom, psödoanevrizma oluşması gibi giriş yeri komplikas- yonları TRYda dahi nadirdir. Ancak bütün hastalar TRYya uy- gun değildir. Bu çalışmanın amacı TRY planlanan hastalarda radial arter çapının öngördürücülerinin belirlenmesidir. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya kararlı koroner arter hastalığı şüp- hesi nedeniyle TRY planlanan 222 hasta alındı. Radial arter çapları işlemden önce B-mod ultrasonografi ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: Radial arter çapı, el bileği çapı (r=0.539, p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINTAŞ, D. A., ARSLAN, A. O., ÇELİK, Ş., KALAYCIOĞLU, E., GÖKDENİZ, T., HATEM, E., AYKAN, A. Ç. (2022). coronary angiography: Is occupation a factor? Transradial yaklaşımla koroner anjiyografi yapılması planlanan hastalarda radial arter çaplarının tahmin edilmesi: Meslek farklılık yaratır mı?. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 450–456. https://ajindex.com/articles/632675

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eu- roIntervention 2013;8:1242–51
  2. Taçoy G, Timurkaynak T. Transradial approach in diagnos- tic and therapeutic interventional coronary artery procedures. [Article in Turkish] Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2010;38:50–6
  3. Vefali V, Arslan U. Our experience with transradial ap- proach for coronary angiography. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2008;36:163–7
  4. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3–7
  5. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angi- ography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CA- RAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:181–7
  6. Aykan AC, Gul I, Gokdeniz T, Kalaycioglu E, Hatem E, Al- tintas Aykan D, et al. Assessment of vascular dysfunction af- ter transradial coronary angiography: is single catheter better? Eur Heart J 2014;35(Suppl.):131. [Abstract] 7. Aykan AC, Gokdeniz T, Gul I, Kalaycıoglu E, Cetin M, Ha- tem E, et al. Comparison of low dose versus standard dose heparin for radial approach in elective coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2014;35(Suppl.):860. [Abstract] 8. Kotowycz MA, Johnston KW, Ivanov J, Asif N, Almoghairi AM, Choudhury A, et al. Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: insights from the Good Radial Artery Size Prediction (GRASP) study. Can J Cardiol 2014;30:211–6
  7. Buturak A, Gorgulu S, Norgaz T, Voyvoda N, Sahingoz Y, Degirmencioglu A, et al. The long-term incidence and predic- tors of radial artery occlusion following a transradial coronary procedure. Cardiol J 2014;21:350–6
  8. Okuyan H, Açikgoz SK, Tacoy G, Kocaman SA, Abaci A. Ef- fect of transradial coronary angiography procedure on vas- cular diameter and vasodilator functions in the access site. Angiology 2013;64:515–21
  9. Aktürk E, Kurtoğlu E, Ermiş N, Açıkgöz N, Yağmur J, Altuntaş MS, et al. Comparision of pain levels of transradial versus transfemoral coronary catheterization: a prospective and randomized study. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2014;14:140– 6
  10. Norgaz T, Gorgulu S, Dagdelen S. A randomized study comparing the effectiveness of right and left radial ap- proach for coronary angiogra