Methods: A total of 1,558 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years with a triglyceride level of
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), Frie - dewald, and a new Martin LDL-C formula in the Turkish adult population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), Frie - dewald, and a new Martin LDL-C formula in the Turkish adult population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Methods: A total of 1,558 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years with a triglyceride level of
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), Frie - dewald, and a new Martin LDL-C formula in the Turkish adult population. Methods: A total of 1,558 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years with a triglyceride level of
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, doğrudan ölçülen LDL-C, Friedewald ve yeni Martin LDL-C hesaplama formüllerini, Türk popülasyonunda karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya trigliserid düzeyi
🔖
Cite This Article
Alpdemir, M., Alpdemir, M. F. (2022). Comparison of Martin and Friedewald equation for estimated LDL-C in adults. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 8, 619–626. https://ajindex.com/articles/632337
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. National Cholesterol Ed- ucation Program: executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97. [Crossref] 2. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. European guidelines on cardiovas- cular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2016;33:2315-81. [Crossref] 3. Esteban-Salan M, Aguilar-Doreste JA, Maria Arranz-Pena L, Juve-Cuxart S, Gich-Salarich I, Zapico-Muniz E, et al. Multicentric evaluation of the homogeneous LDL-cholester- ol Plus assay: comparison with beta-quantification and Frie- dewald formula. Clin Biochem 2008;41:1402-9. [Crossref] 4. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499-502. [Crossref] 5. De Cordova CM, de Cordova MM. A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort. Ann Clin Bio- chem 2013;50:13-9. [Crossref] 6. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs. the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipopro- tein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA 2013;310:2061-8. [Crossref] 7. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guide- line on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019;139:e1046-81. [Crossref] 8. Kang M, Kim J, Lee SY, Kim K, Yoon J, Ki H. Martin’s equation as the most suitable method for estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults. Korean J Fam Med 2017;38:263-9. [Crossref] 9. Chaen H, Kinchiku S, Miyata M, Kajiya S,Uenomachi H, Yuasa T, et al. Validity of a novel method for estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in diabetic pa- tients. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016;23:1355-64. [Crossref] 10. Meeusen JW, Lueke AJ, Jaffe AS, Saenger AK. Validation of a proposed novel equation for estimating LDL cholesterol. Clin Chem 2014;60