Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2018 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 5

Assessment of side branch patency using a jailed semi-inflated balloon technique with coronary bifurcation lesions

Koroner bifurkasyon lezyonlarında ‘jailed semi-inflated balloon’ tekniği ile yan dal açıklığının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
340–348
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The immediate clinical outcomes and procedural success of this study may encourage interventional cardiologiststo use this technique safely with reliable preservation of SBpatency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Many interventional cardiologists are concernedabout the risk of side branch (SB) loss during main vessel(MV) stenting in complex bifurcation lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article is a description of clinical experience with SB patency assessment using the JSBT.Methods: A total of 64 patients with 82 distinct coronary bifurcation lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via JSBT at this institution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The immediate clinical outcomes and procedural success of this study may encourage interventional cardiologiststo use this technique safely with reliable preservation of SBpatency.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Many interventional cardiologists are concernedabout the risk of side branch (SB) loss during main vessel(MV) stenting in complex bifurcation lesions. Therefore, noveltechniques are required to reduce the risk of SB occlusion.The jailed semi-inflated balloon technique (JSBT) is one ofthese techniques. This article is a description of clinical experience with SB patency assessment using the JSBT.Methods: A total of 64 patients with 82 distinct coronary bifurcation lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via JSBT at this institution. In the majority of patients,the SB balloon was inflated with a greater pressure (4.8±2.0atm) than in the standard JSBT. Procedural and immediateclinical outcomes were reviewed via baseline and post-procedural quantitative coronary angiography analysis.Results: The majority of the patients had acute coronarysyndrome (60.9%) and almost one-third of the patients wereMedina class 1.1.1. (32.8%). A jailed-balloon or wire was notentrapped during any PCI. SB ostial dissection was seen inonly 2 patients. The minimal lumen diameter was improved inthe MV and SB following PCI. There were no adverse cardiacevents during in-hospital stay or at 1-month follow-up.Conclusion: JSBT provides maximum SB protection withbifurcation lesions and requires less time than a complextechnique. There was no significant SB occlusion risk eventhough the SB balloon was inflated with a slightly higher pressure. The immediate clinical outcomes and procedural success of this study may encourage interventional cardiologiststo use this technique safely with reliable preservation of SBpatency.

Özet

Amaç: Birçok girişimsel kardiyolog kompleks bifurkasyon lezyonlarında ana damara stent yerleştirme sırasında yan dalın tıkanma riski nedeniyle kaygılıdırlar. Bu yüzden yan dalın tıkanma riskini azaltmak için yeni teknikler gereklidir. ‘Jailed semi-inflated balloon’ (JSB) tekniği bunun için geliştirilmiş tekniklerden biridir. Bu yazıda JSB tekniği ile yan dal açıklığını değerlendirdiğimiz klinik deneyimimizi açıklamaktayız. Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde toplam 82 koroner bifurkasyon lezyonu bulunan ve JSB tekniği ile perkütan koroner girişim (PKG) uygulanan 64 hasta alındı. Hastaların çoğunluğunda yan dal balonu JSB tekniğinden farklı olarak daha yüksek basınçla şişirildi (4.8±2.0 atm). İşlemsel ve erken klinik sonuçlar, başlangıç ve işlem sonrası kantitatif koroner anjiyografi analizi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların çoğunluğu akut koroner sendrom olup (%60.9) yaklaşık üçte biri Medina sınıf 1.1.1 idi (%32.8). Jailed balonu yada teli hiçbir PKG işlemi sırasında sıkışmadı. Yan dal ağzı diseksiyonu yalnızca iki hastada meydana geldi. PKG sonrası minimal lümen çapının ana dalda ve yan dalda düzeldiği görüldü. Hastanede yatış sırasında ve birinci ay kontrollerinde ise hiçbir ciddi kardiyak istenmeyen olay görülmedi. Sonuç: Jailed semi-inflated balloon tekniği bifurkasyon lezyonlarında maksimum yan dal koruması sağlamakla beraber aynı zamanda kompleks bir tekniğe göre daha kısa sürmektedir. Yan dal balonu daha fazla basınçla şişirilmesine rağmen anlamlı yan dal tıkanması görülmedi. Erken klinik sonuçlar ve işlemsel başarı, girişimsel kardiyologları yan dal akımını korumadaki güvenilirliği ile bu tekniği rahatlıkla kullanma konusunda cesaretlendirebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İpek, E., Demirelli, S., Ermiş, E., Gür, M., Çaylı, M., Uçar, H. (2022). Assessment of side branch patency using a jailed semi-inflated balloon technique with coronary bifurcation lesions. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 5, 340–348. https://ajindex.com/articles/632131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Baber U, Kini AS, Sharma SK. Stenting of complex lesions: an overview. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7:485–96. [CrossRef] 2. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimuseluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004;109:1244–9. [CrossRef] 3. Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease: What do we know, what should we do? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:218–26. 4. Stinis CT, Hu SP, Price MJ, Teirstein PS. Three-year outcome of drug-eluting stent implantation for coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:309–14. 5. Lee JM, Park KW, Koo BK, Kim HS. Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: a literature and technical review. Curr Cardiol Rep 2015;17:45. [CrossRef] 6. Katritsis DG, Siontis GC, Ioannidis JP. Double versus single stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:409–15. [CrossRef] 7. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010;121:1235–43. [CrossRef] 8. Lassen JF, Holm NR, Stankovic G, Lefèvre T, Chieffo A, Hildick-Smith D, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. EuroIntervention 2014;10:545–60. [CrossRef] 9. Vassilev D, Gil R. Clinical verification of a theory for predicting side branch stenosis after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2008;21:493–503. [CrossRef] 10. Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Park DW, Lee SW, et al. Preintervention angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors for side branch compromise after a single-stent crossover technique. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1787–93. [CrossRef] 11. Burzotta F, Trani C, Sianos G. Jailed balloon protection: a new technique to avoid acute side-branch occlusion during provisional stenting of bifurcated lesions. Bench test report and first clinical experience. EuroIntervention 2010;5:809– 13. [CrossRef] 12. Depta JP, Patel Y, Patel JS, Novak E, Yeung M, Zajarias A, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes with the use of a modified provisional jailed-balloon stenting technique for the treatment of nonleft main coronary bifurcation lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;82:E637–46. [Cro