Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2019 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of secondary prevention in coronary heart disease patients living in rural and urban areas

Kırsal ve kentli hastalarda koroner kalp hastalığı sonrası ikincil korunmanın karşılaştırılması

Pages
128–136
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The rate of quittingwas significantly higher in the urban group (20.5% vs. 11.2%;p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to assessdifferences between urban and rural patients with coronaryheart disease (CHD) with respect to secondary prevention.Methods: This cross-sectional study included all consecutivepatients diagnosed with CHD at 2 cardiology clinics betweenJanuary 2016 and January 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into 2 groups accordingto residence based on their statements: urban (n=1752)and rural (n=456).Results: The median age of the patients was 64 years (interquartilerange: 12 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The rate of quittingwas significantly higher in the urban group (20.5% vs. 11.2%;p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assessdifferences between urban and rural patients with coronaryheart disease (CHD) with respect to secondary prevention.Methods: This cross-sectional study included all consecutivepatients diagnosed with CHD at 2 cardiology clinics betweenJanuary 2016 and January 2017. The demographic characteristicsand laboratory parameters were recorded at routinecontrol visits. The patients were divided into 2 groups accordingto residence based on their statements: urban (n=1752)and rural (n=456).Results: The median age of the patients was 64 years (interquartilerange: 12 years). A mean of 4.1±2.1 years had passedafter the first (index) coronary event. It was determined that22.2% of the patients continued to smoke. The rate of quittingwas significantly higher in the urban group (20.5% vs. 11.2%;p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda kırsalda ve kentte yaşayan koroner kalp hastalarında (KKH) ikincil korunmanın karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Kesitsel çalışmamıza iki farklı kardiyoloji kliniğinde Ocak 2016 ve Ocak 2017 tarihleri arasında başvuran KKH tanılı ardışık tüm hastalar dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, tıbbi öyküleri ve son üç ayda bakılan laboratuvar değerleri kayıt edildi. Hastaların beyanlarından yerleşim yerlerine göre; kırsal (n=456) ve kentsel (n=1752) hastalar olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların medyan yaşı 64 (çeyrekler arası, 12) yıl olup kırsal ve kentsel hastalar arasında fark izlenmedi. İlk koroner hadiseden ortalama 4.1±2.1 yıl geçmiş idi. Hastaların %22.2’sinin hala sigara içtiği ve sigara bırakma oranının kentsel hastalarda belirgin daha yüksek olduğu saptandı (%20.5 ve %11.2; p

🔖

Cite This Article

Kuzu, Z., SARAÇOĞLU, E., Yıldırım, A., Çekici, Y., Kayıkçıoğlu, M., KILIÇ, S., Kılıç, D. D. (2022). Comparison of secondary prevention in coronary heart disease patients living in rural and urban areas. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 128–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/632100

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Özkan AA. Acute coronary syndromes: epidemiology. Turk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2013;41:1–3
  2. Onat A, Yüksel M, Köroğlu B, Gümrükçüoğlu HA, Aydın M, Çakmak HA, et al. [Turkish Adult Risk Factor Study survey 2012: overall and coronary mortality and trends in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2013;41:373–8
  3. Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA. Metaanalysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:659–72
  4. McAlister FA, Lawson FM, Teo KK, Armstrong PW. Randomised trials of secondary prevention programmes in coronary heart disease: systematic review. BMJ 2001;323:957–62
  5. EUROASPIRE. A European Society of Cardiology survey of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: principal results. EUROASPIRE Study Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1569–82
  6. EUROASPIRE II Study Group. Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries; principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J 2001;22:554–72
  7. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Pyörälä K, Keil U; EUROASPIRE Study Group. EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 Europeancountries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009;16:121–37
  8. Tokgözoğlu L, Kaya EB, Erol C, Ergene O; EUROASPIRE III Turkey Study Group. [EUROASPIRE III: a comparison between Turkey and Europe]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2010;38:164–72
  9. Tokgözoğlu L, Kayıkçıoğlu M, Altay S, Aydoğdu S, Barçın C, Bostan C, et al. [EUROASPIRE-IV: European Society of Cardiology study of lifestyle, risk factors, and treatment approaches in patients with coronary arterydisease: Data from Turkey]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2017;45:134–44
  10. Cakir Ç, Ates H, Kiliçaslan B, Nazli C, Ergene O. Predictors of premature clopidogrel discontinuation within 30 days of successful coronary artery stenting. Int J Cardiovasc Acad 2018;4:1–5
  11. Krishna S, Gillespie KN, McBride TM. Diabetes burden and access to preventive care in the rural United States. The Journal of Rural Health 2010;26:3–11
  12. Vanasse A, Courteau J, Cohen A, Orzanco M, Drouin C. Rural- urban disparities in the management and health issues of chronic diseases in Quebec (Canada) in the early 2000s. Rural Remote Health 2010;10:1548
  13. Probst JC, Bellinger JD, Wals