SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2020 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Prevalence of inappropriate sinus tachycardia and the comparison of the heart rate variability characteristics with propensity score-matched controls

Uygunsuz sinüs taşikardisinin prevalansı ve propensite skor eşleşmeli kontrol grubu ile kalp hızı değişkenliğinin karşılaştırılması

Evrim ŞİMŞEK
Levent Hürkan CAN
Burcu YAĞMUR
Hatice S. KEMAL
İnan MUTLU
Benay ÖZBAY
Ecem GÜRSES
Pages
96–102
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The IST patients were younger (39.6±17.4 vs. 50.2±17.2years; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a syndrome characterized by an elevated resting heart rate withdistressing symptoms and no secondary cause of sinustachycardia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted to evaluate both theprevalence of IST among symptomatic patients and heartrate variability (HRV) characteristics.Methods: The records of all consecutive symptomatic patients who had undergone 24-hour Holter monitoring between September 2015 and November 2016 at a singlecenter were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The IST patients were younger (39.6±17.4 vs. 50.2±17.2years; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a syndrome characterized by an elevated resting heart rate withdistressing symptoms and no secondary cause of sinustachycardia. This study was conducted to evaluate both theprevalence of IST among symptomatic patients and heartrate variability (HRV) characteristics.Methods: The records of all consecutive symptomatic patients who had undergone 24-hour Holter monitoring between September 2015 and November 2016 at a singlecenter were retrospectively evaluated. IST was defined asa 24-hour mean heart rate (HR) of ≥90 beats/minute anda resting HR of ≥100 beats/minute in the absence of anysecondary cause of sinus tachycardia. All of the study datarelated to clinical characteristics, symptoms, concomitantdiseases, and Holter electrocardiogram parameters wereobtained from the electronic hospital records. A propensityage- and sex-matched control group was selected from anon-IST patient cohort.Results: A total of 1865 consecutive patients were evaluatedand 32% were excluded due to an inadequate Holter recording period or insufficient quality, atrial fibrillation episodes, atrioventricular block, or >1% atrial or ventricular extrasystoles.Among 1265 patients with sinus rhythm, 4.98% (n=63) hadIST. The IST patients were younger (39.6±17.4 vs. 50.2±17.2years; p

Özet

Amaç: Uygunsuz sinüs taşikardisi (UST) herhangi bir ikincil neden olmadan artmış istirahat kalp hızı ve rahatsız edici semptomlarla karakterize bir sendromdur. Daha önce çok değerlendirilmemiş özellikle semptomatik hastalarda UST prevalansını ve bu hastalardaki kalp hızı değişkenliğini (HRV) değerlendirmek için mevcut çalışma tasarlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Eylül 2015 ile Kasım 2016 tarihleri arasında tek bir merkezde 24 saat Holter elektrokardiyografi (EKG) tetkiki yapılan hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. UST, ikincil bir neden olmadan 24 saatlik ortalama KH ≥90 vuru/ dk. ve istirahat KH ≥100 vuru/dk. olması olarak tanımlandı. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet gibi bazal karakteristik özellikleri, eşlik eden hastalıkları ve Holter EKG dataları elektronik hasta kayıt dosyalarından alındı. HRV analizi için UST olmayan hasta kohortundan yaş ve cinsiyete göre propensite skor eşleşmeli kontrol grubu oluşturuldu. Bulgular: Toplam 1865 ardışık hasta değerlendirildi ve hastaların %32’si yetersiz kayıt süresi veya kalitesi, atriyal fibrilasyon atakları, atriyoventriküler blok ve >%1 atriyal veya ventriküler ekstra sistoller nedeniyle dışlandı. Sinüs ritmi olan 1265 hastanın %4.98’inde (63) UST saptandı. UST hastaları daha gençti (39.6±17.4’e karşı 50.2±17.2, p

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, E., CAN, L. H., YAĞMUR, B., KEMAL, H. S., MUTLU, İ., ÖZBAY, B., GÜRSES, E. (2022). Prevalence of inappropriate sinus tachycardia and the comparison of the heart rate variability characteristics with propensity score-matched controls. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 96–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/631993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Winum PF, Cayla G, Rubini M, Beck L, Messner-Pellenc P. A case of cardiomyopathy induced by inappropriate sinus tachycardia and cured by ivabradine. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:942–4
  2. Sağ S, Çoşkun H, Baran İ, Güllülü S, Aydınlar A. Inappropriate sinus tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy during pregnancy and successful treatment with ivabradine. Anatol J Cardiol 2016;16:212–3
  3. Sheldon RS, Grubb BP 2nd, Olshansky B, Shen WK, Calkins H, Brignole M, et al. 2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm 2015;12:e41–63
  4. Rubenstein JC, Freher M, Kadish A, Goldberger JJ. Diurnal heart rate patterns in inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33:911–9
  5. Pellegrini CN, Scheinman MM. Epidemiology and definition of inappropriate sinus tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2016;46:29–32
  6. Still AM, Raatikainen P, Ylitalo A, Kauma H, Ikäheimo M, Antero Kesäniemi Y, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and natural course of inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Europace 2005;7:104–12
  7. Olshansky B, Sullivan RM. Inappropriate sinus tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:793–801
  8. Peyrol M, Lévy S. Clinical presentation of inappropriate sinus tachycardia and differential diagnosis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2016;46:33–41
  9. Lopera G, Castellanos A, Moleiro F, Huikuri HV, Myerburg RJ. inappropriate sinus tachycardia in elderly females. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2003;8:139–43
  10. Castellanos A, Moleiro F, Chakko S, Acosta H, Huikuri H, Mitrani RD, et al. Heart rate variability in inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:531–4. 11. [No authors listed]. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 1996;93:1043–65
  11. Leon H, Guzman JC, Kuusela T, Dillenburg R, Kamath M, Morillo CA. Impaired baroreflex gain in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:64–8
  12. Sharashova E, Wilsgaard T, Mathiesen EB, Løchen ML, Njølstad I, Brenn T. Resting heart rate predicts incident myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, ischaemic stroke and death in the general population: the Tromso Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:902–9
  13. Pfister R, Michels G, Shar