Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2020 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

The effect of the age on outcomes at a cardiac rehabilitation center in Turkey

Türkiye’de bir kardiyak rehabilitasyon merkezinin hastalarında yaşın sonuçlar üzerine etkisi

Pages
270–277
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of the present study revealed that patients in a Turkish population aged 65 and over benefited from CR as much as younger patients did in terms of physical parameters, echocardiography measurements, lipid prof iles, and psychological parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a 12-week phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in Turkish patients aged between ≤65 years and >65 years using psychical parameters, echocardiography measurements, lipid profiles, and psychological parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 68 patients who completed a phase II CR program were enrolled in this retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of the present study revealed that patients in a Turkish population aged 65 and over benefited from CR as much as younger patients did in terms of physical parameters, echocardiography measurements, lipid prof iles, and psychological parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a 12-week phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in Turkish patients aged between ≤65 years and >65 years using psychical parameters, echocardiography measurements, lipid profiles, and psychological parameters. Methods: A total of 68 patients who completed a phase II CR program were enrolled in this retrospective study. The echocardiography measurements, as well as assessment of physical parameters, psychological state, and serum lipid level of the patients were evaluated before the entry into the program and just after the completion. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those aged 65 years and under and those over the age of 65, and the effects of the CR program were compared. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the average heart rate (HR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) I-II scores of young patients before and after cardiac rehabilitation. The LVEF, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), BDI, STAI-I, and STAI-II parameters of older patients were statistically significant. In the comparison between those who were 65 years and under and those over the age of 65, the change in the mean HR (+11.24±12.62 bpm vs. +3.96±12.50 bpm; p=0.039), LVEF (+21.31±21.37% vs. +9.55±13.50%; p=0.035) and STAI I scores (-11.33±11.51 points vs. -23.25±14.08 points; p=0.025) were significantly different. Conclusion: The results of the present study revealed that patients in a Turkish population aged 65 and over benefited from CR as much as younger patients did in terms of physical parameters, echocardiography measurements, lipid prof iles, and psychological parameters.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı ≤65 yaş ve >65 yaş arasındaki Türk hastalarda fizyolojik parametreler, ekokardiyografi ölçümleri, lipit profilleri ve psikolojik parametreler açısından 12 haftalık faz II kalp rehabilitasyonunun (KR) etkinliğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Bu geriye dönük çalışmaya, faz II kalp rehabilitasyon programlarını tamamlamış 68 hasta alındı. Hastaların ekokardiyografi ölçümü, fiziksel parametreleri, psikolojik durumları ve serum lipit düzeyleri programa girmeden önce ve program tamamlandıktan hemen sonra değerlendirildi. Hastalar 65 yaş ve altı ve 65 yaş üstü olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı ve KR programının etkisi karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: KR öncesi ve sonrası 65 yaş ve altı hastaların ortalama kalp hızı (KH), seans sırasında egzersiz seviyesi, sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonu (SVEF), Beck Depresyon Envanteri (BDE), Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri (STAI) I-II, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık gösterdi. Altmış beş yaş üstü hastaların ortalama seans sırasında egzersiz seviyesi, SVEF, yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein (HDL), BDE, STAI-I ve STAI-II parametreleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı. Altmış beş yaş ve altı ve 65 yaş üstü hasta gruplarının yüzde değişimleri karşılaştırıldığında, ortalama KH (+11.24±12.62 ve +3.96±12.50; p=0.039), SVEF (+21.31±21.37 vs +9.55±13.50; p=0.035) ve STAI I (-11.33±11.51 ve -23.25±1 4.08; p=0.025) parametreleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı. Sonuç: Bu çalışma Türk toplumunda yaşlı hastaların KR’den genç hastalar kadar fiziksel parametreler, ekokardiyografi ölçümleri, lipid profili ve psikolojik parametreler açısından yarar sağladığını ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAYIROĞLU, M., UZUN, M., ORHAN, A. L., GÜNDOĞMUŞ, P. D., ÖLÇÜ, E. B., GÜNDOĞMUŞ, İ. (2022). The effect of the age on outcomes at a cardiac rehabilitation center in Turkey. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 270–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/631915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercisebased cardiac rehabilitation post–myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J 2011;162:571–84
  2. Swift DL, Lavie CJ, Johannsen NM, Arena R, Earnest CP, O’Keefe JH, et al. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and exercise training in primary and secondary coronary prevention. Circ J 2013;77:281–92
  3. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 2004;116:682–92
  4. Ades PA, Huang D, Weaver SO. Cardiac rehabilitation participation predicts lower rehospitalization costs. Am Heart J 1992;123:916–21
  5. Goel K, Lennon RJ, Tilbury RT, Squires RW, Thomas RJ. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in the community. Circulation 2011;123:2344–52
  6. Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA. Metaanalysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:659–72
  7. Sarrafzadegan N, Rabiei K, Kabir A, Asgary S, Tavassoli A, Khosravi A, et al. Changes in lipid profile of patients referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008;15:467–72
  8. Taylor RS, Unal B, Critchley JA, Capewell S. Mortality reductions in patients receiving exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: how much can be attributed to cardiovascular risk factor improvements? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006;13:369–74
  9. Kalkan K, Hamur H, Yildirim E, Ipek E, Ermis E, Ozturk M, et al. The Comparison of Angiographic Scoring Systems With the Predictors of Atherosclerosis. Angiology 2018;69:158–63
  10. Acar RD, Bulut M, Ergün S, Yesin M, Akçakoyun M. Evaluation of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation on left atrial and left ventricular function and its relationship with changes in arterial stiffness in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiography 2015;32:443–7
  11. Pasquali SK, Alexander KP, Peterson ED. Cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly. Am Heart J 2001;142:748–55
  12. Grace SL, Shanmugasegaram S, Gravely-Witte S, Brual J, Suskin N, Stewart DE. Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: does age make a difference? J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2009;29:183–7
  13. Kligfield P, McCormick A, Chai A, Jacobson A, Feuerstadt P, Hao SC. Effect of age a