Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2022 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Prognostic Impact of Nutritional Indices in Candidates for Heart Transplantation

Pages
92–100
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although both the CONUT score and the PNI score were associated with prognosis in candidates for HT, the CONUT score was superior to the PNI score in predicting mortality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: No study has thus far evaluated the association of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with prognosis in candidates listed for heart transplantation (HT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 195 candidates for HT were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although both the CONUT score and the PNI score were associated with prognosis in candidates for HT, the CONUT score was superior to the PNI score in predicting mortality.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: No study has thus far evaluated the association of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with prognosis in candidates listed for heart transplantation (HT). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of these nutritional indices on prognosis in these candidates. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 195 candidates for HT were included. Over a median follow-up period of 503.5 days, the patients were grouped as survivors (n=121) and non-survivors (n = 74). Malnutrition was defined as CONUT score ≥2 (CONUT-defined malnutrition) and PNI ≤38 (PNI-defined malnutrition). Results: The CONUT-defined malnutrition was observed in 19.8% and 39.2% of the survivors and non-survivors (P = .003), and the PNI-defined malnutrition was observed in 7.4% and 16.2% of the survivors and non-survivors (P = .032). The univariate analysis revealed that the CONUT score from 0 to 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–1.79, P =.004) and PNI from 45.5 to 54.5 (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64–0.95, P = .001), the CONUT-defined malnutrition (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.55–3.97, P < .001) and the PNI-defined malnutrition (HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.01–3.86, P = .04) were associated with mortality. In the multivariate adjusted models, the CONUT-defined malnutrition was an independent predictor of mortality, whereas the PNI-defined malnutrition was not a predictor of mortality (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.12–3.27, P = .001 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.80–3.40, P = .18). The log-rank test revealed that the CONUT-defined malnutrition and the PNI-defined malnutrition were associated with decrease in survival rate. Conclusion: Although both the CONUT score and the PNI score were associated with prognosis in candidates for HT, the CONUT score was superior to the PNI score in predicting mortality.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAM, Z., EFE, S. Ç., KARAGÖZ, A., ACAR, R. D., GÜVENDİ, B., KAYMAZ, C., AKBAL, Ö. Y., YILMAZ, F., DOĞAN, C., UYSAL, S., ÖZDEMİR, N., TOKGÖZ, H. C., KIRALİ, M. K. (2022). Prognostic Impact of Nutritional Indices in Candidates for Heart Transplantation. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 92–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/631804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Maggioni AP, Dahlström U, Filippatos G, et al. EURObservational Research Programme: regional differences and 1-year follow-up results of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot). Eur J Heart Fail. 2013
  2. 15(7):808-817. [Crossref] 2. Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2007
  3. 93(9):1137-1146. [Crossref] 3. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016
  4. 18(8):891-975. [Crossref] 4. Sherlock S. The liver in heart failure
  5. relation of anatomical, functional, and circulatory changes. Br Heart J. 1951
  6. 13(3):273-293. [Crossref] 5. Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argilés J, et al. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) “cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases” and “nutrition in geriatrics”. Clin Nutr. 2010
  7. 29(2):154- 159. [Crossref] 6. Buzby GP, Mullen JL, Matthews DC, Hobbs CL, Rosato EF. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg. 1980
  8. 139(1):160-7. [Crossref] 7. Alataş ÖD, Biteker M, Yildirim B, Acar E, Gökçek K. Comparison of objective nutritional indexes for the prediction of in-hospital mortality among elderly patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020
  9. 27(5):362-367. [Crossref] 8. Sze S, Pellicori P, Kazmi S, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of malnutrition using 3 scoring systems among outpatients with heart failure: a comparison with body mass index. JACC Heart Fail. 2018
  10. 6(6):476-486. [Crossref] 9. Yoo SH, Kook HY, Hong YJ, Kim JH, Ahn Y, Jeong MH. Influence of undernutrition at admission on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2017
  11. 69(3):555-560. [Crossref] 10. Basta G, Chatzianagnostou K, Paradossi U, et al. The prognostic impact of objective nutritional indices in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol. 2016
  12. [Crossref] 11. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Article in Japanese. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984
  13. 85(9):1001-5. 12. Efe SC, Kar