SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Critical appraisal of trial reports

Araştırma makalelerinin kritik analizi

Bülent URMAN
Barış ATA
Pages
83–88
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Methodological issues in critical appraisal of published research articles are summarized in this review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An increasing number of research articles are being published every day due to rapid developments in technology and communication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Unfortunately, most of these published articles are far from reaching the highest methodological quality, even in most prestigious international peer reviewed journals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Methodological issues in critical appraisal of published research articles are summarized in this review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An increasing number of research articles are being published every day due to rapid developments in technology and communication. Unfortunately, most of these published articles are far from reaching the highest methodological quality, even in most prestigious international peer reviewed journals. Considering the limited time devoted to methodological training during medical education on top of these facts, sifting the correct and relevant evidence from the pile of published material is a difficult task for the clinician who is expected to practice in the light of evidence based medicine. Methodological issues in critical appraisal of published research articles are summarized in this review.

Özet

Teknoloji ve iletişimdeki ilerlemeler sonucunda giderek artan hız ve sayıda araştırma makalesi yayınlanmaktadır. Maalesef en yüksek standartları korumaya çalışan uluslararası hakemli dergiler de dahil olmak üzere yayınlanan araştırmaların çoğunun metodolojik kalitesi yüksek değildir. Ülkemizdeki tıp eğitimi sürecinde metodolojiye ayrılan zamanın azlığı da bu faktörlere eklendiğinde uygulamalarını kanıta dayalı tıp prensipleri ışığında yönlendirmek durumunda olan doktorların karar verme sürecinde kendilerine yardımcı olacak gerçek ve uygun kanıtları bulup değerlendirmesi zorlaşmaktadır. Bu makalede yayınlanmış araştırma makalelerinin kritik analizinde göz önüne alınması gereken metodolojik kavramlar özetlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

URMAN, B., ATA, B. (2022). Critical appraisal of trial reports. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 83–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/631717

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Altman, D.G., The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ, 1994; 308(6924): p. 283- 4
  2. Arce, J.C., A. NyboeAndersen, and J. Collins,Resolvingmethodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review. HumReprod, 2005; 20(7): p. 1757- 71
  3. Min, J. K., S. A. Breheny, V. MacLachlan, and D. L. Healy, What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod, 2004; 19(1): p. 3- 7
  4. Moher, D., K.F. Schulz, and D.G. Altman, The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 2001; 357(9263): p. 1191- 4
  5. Daya, S., The Placebo Effect. Evidence Based Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000; 2(1): p. 1
  6. McCarney, R., J.Warner, S. Iliffe, R. van Haselen,M. Griffin, and P. Fisher, The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007; 7: p. 30.