Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Does transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment at first trimester predict preterm delivery and abortion?

İlk üçayda transvajinal ultrasonografi ile servikal değerlendirme erken doğum ve abortusu önceden belirleyebilir mi?

Pages
17–22
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of cervical length (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Our aim is to assess cut-off values of cervical lengths and dilatation of internal os as measured by transvaginal sonogram at 12th gestational weeks to predict second trimester abortion and preterm delivery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material-Method: This was a prospective study involving 59 pregnant women attending for antenatal care who underwent transvaginal scans at 12 weeks for evaluation of cervical length.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of cervical length (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Our aim is to assess cut-off values of cervical lengths and dilatation of internal os as measured by transvaginal sonogram at 12th gestational weeks to predict second trimester abortion and preterm delivery. Material-Method: This was a prospective study involving 59 pregnant women attending for antenatal care who underwent transvaginal scans at 12 weeks for evaluation of cervical length. The mean cervical lengths and dilatation of internal os were compared between groups which delivered at term, preterm or abortion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values also were calculated for preterm delivery and abortion. Results: Preterm delivery threat occurred in 16.9 % of the women. The mean cervical length of abortion group was 35.1 ± 7.9 mm while the cervical length of term group was 44.3 ± 5.5 mm at 12th week. There is statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of cervical length (p

Özet

Amacımız ikinci üçay düşük ve erken doğum tehdidini önceden belirleyebilmek için gebeliğin 12. haftasında transvajinal ultrasonografi ile ölçülen servikal uzunluğun ve internal os açıklığının sınır değerlerini bulmak. Gereç ve yöntemler Bu çalışmada antenatal bakım için başvuran 59 hastada prospektif olarak gebeliğin 12. haftasında servikal uzunluk ve internal os açıklığı ölçüldü. Ortalama servikal uzunluk ve internal os açıklıkları miad, erken doğum tehdidi ve düşük gelişen gebeliklerde karşılaştırıldı. Sensitivite, spesifisite, negatif ve pozitif belirleyicilik değerleri erken doğum tehdidi ve düşük ile karşılaşılan gebelikler için hesaplandı. Bulgular Erken doğum tehdidi çalışma grubundaki kadınların % 16.9 unda gelişti. Gebeliğin 12. haftasında ortalama servikal uzunluk düşük grubunda 35.1 ± 7.9 mm saptanırken, miadında doğum yapanlarda 44.3 ± 5.5 mm saptandı. İki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunurken erken doğum tehdidi saptananlarla miadında doğum yapanlar arasında istatistiksel fark saptanmadı. Onikinci haftada yapılan servikal uzunluk ölçümünde sınır değer 35 mm alınırsa sensitivite, spesifisite, pozitif ve negatif belirleyicilik değerleri sırasıyla % 40, 93, 57 ve 88 olarak saptandı. Sonuç Gebeliğin 12. Haftasında ki servikal uzunluk ölçümü erken doğum tehdidi ve abortusu önceden belirlemede güvenilir bir tarama yöntemi olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, A., DANE, B., TEMİZ, İ., DANE, C. (2022). Does transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment at first trimester predict preterm delivery and abortion?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 17–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/631664

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Makrydimas G. Threatened miscarriage: evaluation and management. BMJ 2004; 329: 152- 5
  2. Zorzoli A, Soliani A, Perra M, Caravelli E, Galimberti A, Nicolini U. Cervical changes throughout pregnancy as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 960-4
  3. Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Takahashi K, Tanaka T, Aoki K, Torii Y. A prospective clinical study for the prediction of preterm delivery in a low-risk population. J Matern Fetal Invest 1996; 6: 148- 51
  4. Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman KA, Weiner S, Bolognese R, Wapner RJ. Cervical ultrasonography compared to manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 723- 30
  5. Naim A, Haberman S, Burgess T, Navizedeh N, Minkoff H. Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 887- 9
  6. Andrews WW, Copper R, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Neely C, Dubard M. Second-trimester cervical ultrasound: associations with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 222- 6
  7. Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Tread-well MC. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length of ≤15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1458- 67
  8. Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O’Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 204- 10
  9. Berghella V, Talucci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 140- 4
  10. Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 859- 67
  11. Gramellini D, Fieni S, Molina E, Berretta R, Vadora E. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 227- 32
  12. Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 902- 7
  13. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567- 72
  14. Ermifl H, Has R, Kalelio¤lu ‹. Düflük riskli tek