Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Adnexal masses in pregnancy: Baskent University experience

Gebelikte görülen adneksiyal kistler: Başkent Üniversitesi deneyimi

Pages
113–117
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, if there is no sign of malignancy it can be conservatively managed during pregnancy and cesarean section.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Adnexal mass in pregnancy is a rare situation in daily clinical practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material methods: In this study,we retrospectively identified adnexal mass which was diagnosed during antenatal follow-up or cesarean section between 2000-2009 in Baflkent University Hospital,Department of obstetricsgynecology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, if there is no sign of malignancy it can be conservatively managed during pregnancy and cesarean section.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Adnexal mass in pregnancy is a rare situation in daily clinical practice. Also, there is no consensus about the management of the adnexal mass diagnosed during pregnancy. Material methods: In this study,we retrospectively identified adnexal mass which was diagnosed during antenatal follow-up or cesarean section between 2000-2009 in Baflkent University Hospital,Department of obstetricsgynecology. Labor-delivery unit database, hospital records and pathology reports were evaluated in order to retrive the age of patients, number of gravida and parity, initial symptoms, the gestational age and the diameter of cyst, antenatal complications, time of delivery birth weight, indication of cesarean delivery, the type of surgical intervention during cearean delivery and pathology of the cyst. Results: We identified 27 pregnancy complicated with adnexal masses among the 2150 delivery ( 1.25%). Among these,25 of 27 pregnants were asymptomatic (92,6%) while just 2 pregnant women came with the complaint of pain. In 2 of the patients (7,4%) the cyst was known before the pregnancy while in 6 pregnant women (22,4%) the cyst was diagnosed during antenatal care. Also, rest of the women (n=19, 70,4%) were diagnosed during cesarean. The 3 of the cysts (11,1%) was smaller than 6 cm while another 3 of the cysts (11,1%) was greater than 6 cm. Cesarean and cystectomy was performed in 23 of this women. On the other hand, 2 of them had cesarean and unilateral ooferectomy.Pathologic examinations reported as; 6(22,2%) dermoid cyst, 3 (11,1%) endometrioma, 4(14,8%) seros cystadenoma, 3(%11.1) Morgagni cyst, 4(%14.8) mucinous cyst, 3(%11.1) follicular cyst, 2(%7.4) siderophagic cyst, 1(%3.7) fibrom, 1 (%3.7) thecoma. Conclusion: Most of the adnexal masses diagnosed during antenatal period or cesarean section is benign. Therefore, if there is no sign of malignancy it can be conservatively managed during pregnancy and cesarean section.

Özet

Amaç: Antenatal takipleri sırasında ve/veya sezaryen sırasında saptanan adneksiyal kitlelerin takip ve tedavi sonuçlarının literatür bulgularıyla karşılaştırılmalı olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve yöntemler: Başkent Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği’nde 2000-2009 yılları arasında doğum yapan hastaların hastane kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelenip, bu hastaların yaşları, başvuru semptomu, kistin saptandığı gebelik haftası ve bu haftada kistin boyutu, kiste bağlı gebelik sırasında gelişen komplikasyonlar, kiste yapılan cerrahi girişimler, kistin histopatolojik değerlendirmesi sonuçları kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Takip edilen 2150 gebenin 27 tanesinde over kisti saptanmıştır (%1.25) Yirmibeş (%92.6) hastanın adneksiyel kisti asemptomatik olup, sadece 2(%7.4) hasta ağrı şikayeti ile başvurmuştur. İki (%7.4) hastadaki over kisti gebe kalmadan önce de bilinirken, 6(%22.4) hastada gebelik esnasında, 19(%70.4) hastada ise sezaryen sırasında kist saptanmıştır. Antenatal takiplerinde 3(%11.1) hastada kistin boyutu 6 cm’den küçük, 3 (%11.1) hastada kistin boyutu 6 cm’den büyük idi. Yirmi üç hastaya sezaryen ve kistektomi, 2 hastaya sezaryen ve unilateral ooferektomi, 1 hastaya 19 haftalık gebeliği sırasında laparotomi ile unilateral salpingooferektomi ve omentektomi, 1 hastaya 17 haftalık gebeliği sırasında laparoskopi ile kist eksizyonu yapıldı. Patoloji sonuçları 6 (%22,2) dermoid kist, 3(%11.1) endometrioma, 4(%14.8) seröz kistadenom, 3(%11.1) Morgagni kisti, 4(%14.8) musinöz kist, 3(%11.1) folikül kisti, 2(%7.4) siderofajik kist, 1(%3.7) fibroma,1(%3.7) tekoma ile uyumlu idi. Sonuç: Klinik muayene ve görüntüleme yöntemleri ile benign bir kitleden şüpheleniyorsa, hastada herhangi bir bulgu vermiyorsa kist doğuma kadar izlenebilir. USG daha pratik bir yaklaşım olduğundan gebe hastalara ilk obstetrik USG muayenesinden itibaren her iki adneks rutin olarak değerlendirilmelidir. Sezaryen sırasında tespit edilen tüm kistik yapılar şüphe varsa patolojiye gönderilip malignensi olasılığı ekarte edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞÇU, E., YANIK, F. F., ZEYNELOĞLU, H. B., DURSUN, P., ÇABUK, E., BİLDACİ, B., AYHAN, A. (2022). Adnexal masses in pregnancy: Baskent University experience. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 113–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/631615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Whitecar MAP, Turner S, Higby MK: Adnexial masses in pregnancy: A review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181(1): 19- 24
  2. Chiang G,Levine D.Imaging of adnexial masses during pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 805- 19
  3. Leiserowitz, Gary S. MD, Managing ovarian masses during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006 Jul; 61(7): 463- 70
  4. Gary Scott Leitsowitz: Surgical complications during pregnancy In Niswander KR, Evans AT(Eds) Manual Of Obstretics, 5th Ed. Boston, Little Brown and Company 1996; 239- 60
  5. Duic Z., Kukura V, Ciglar S, Podobnik M. Adnexial masses in pregnancy:a review of eight cases undergoing surgical managment. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002; 23: 133- 4
  6. Michel E. Rivlin. Surgery and truma in pregnancy. In: Rivlin ME, Martin RW, Wiser WL, Manual of clinical problems in obsterics and gynecology, 5 th ed. Philedelpihia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000; 126- 30
  7. Bromley B, Benacerraf B.Adnexial masses during pregnancy: Accuary of sonographic diagnosis and outcome. J Ultrasound Med. 1997 Jul; 16(7): 447- 52
  8. Nicholas A. Telischak et al. MRI of adnexial masses in pregnancy AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug; 191(2): 364- 70
  9. Condous G, Okaro E, Bourne T. The conservative managment of early pregnancy complications: a review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 420- 30
  10. Schemeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Adnexial masses in pregnancy: Surgey compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 1098- 103 11. Platek DN, Handerson CE, Goldberg GL,The management of a persistent adnexial mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1236- 40.