Umbilical cord prolapse: Risk factors and perinatal outcomes

Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: To determine obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by umbilical cord prolapse.

📊

Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS-METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine of the Bakirkoy Women and Children’s Teaching Hospital between 2000 and 2007.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Multiparity wase more common in patients with umbilical cord prolapse (%70–%45.5 P

🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey

📍Scope:2000 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine obstetric risk factors and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by umbilical cord prolapse. MATERIALS-METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine of the Bakirkoy Women and Children’s Teaching Hospital between 2000 and 2007. Birth records of 110 cases with umbilical cord prolapse and 600 randomly selected controls were reviewed retrospectively.RESULTS: Prolapse of the umbilical cord complicated 0.4% (ns456) of all deliveries included in the study. Multiparity wase more common in patients with umbilical cord prolapse (%70–%45.5 P

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı umbilikal kord prolapsusu ile komplike olmuş gebeliklere ait risk faktörlerinin ve perinatal sonuçların değerlendirilmedir. METHOD: Bu çalışma 2000 ile 2007 yıllarında İstanbul Bakırköy Kadın ve Çocuk Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde retrospektif olarak yapıldı. Umbilikal kord prolapsusu olan 110 olgu ve rastgele seçilen 600 olgunun doğum raporları incelendi. SONUÇLAR: Çalışma süresi içinde kordon prolapsusu ile komplike olmuş doğumlar tüm doğumların oluşturuyordu. Umbilikal kord prolapsusu olan olgularda multiparitenin daha fazla olduğu bulundu (%70–%45.5 P

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, G., GÜNGÖRDÜK, K., TEKİRDAĞ, A. İ., ARK, H. C., OLGAÇ, Y. (2022). Umbilical cord prolapse: Risk factors and perinatal outcomes. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 94–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/631592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. 2006; 61(4): 269- 77
Dilbaz B, Ozturkoglu E, Dilbaz S, OzturkN, Sivaslioglu AA, Haberal A. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse. 2006; 274(2): 104- 7
Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M. Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. 2004 84(2): 127- 32
Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K. Umbilical cord prolapse, a contemporary look. J Reprod Med. 1990; 35: 690- 2
Khan RS, Nanı T, Nizami F. Umbilical cord prolapse--a review of diagnosis to delivery interval on perinatal and maternal outcome. 2007; 57(10): 487- 91
Qureshi NS, Taylor DJ, Tomlinson AJ.Umbilical cord prolapse. 2004; 86(1): 29- 30
Uygur D. Ki S, Tuncer R, Ozcan FS, Erkaya S. Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse. 2002; 78(2): 127- 30
CruikshankDP.Malpresentations and umbilical cord complications. In: Danforth DN, Scott JR, DiSaia PJ, Hammond CB, Spellacy WN, editors. 8th ed. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1999. p. 433- 4
Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM. Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16: 479- 84
Roberts WE, Martin RW, Roach HH, Perry KG, Martin JN, Morrison JC. Are obstetric interventions such as cervical ripening, induction of labor, amnioinfusion, or amniotomy associated with umbilical cord prolapse. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176: 1181– 5
Yla Outinen A, Heinonen PK, Tuimala R. Predisposing and risk factors of umbilical cord prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985; 64: 567- 70.