Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of evidence-based tests which were used to evaluate and diagnose process of urinary incontinence

Üriner inkontinansın tanı ve değerlendirme sürecinde uygulanan klinik testlerin kanıt temelli incelenmesi

Pages
153–163
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Adaptation of such a test so that it could be performed in primary care with a naturally filled bladder may prove clinically useful. • If a patient is to undergo an invasive urodynamic procedure, multichannel urodynamics is likely to give the most accurate result in a secondary care setting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this review we aimed to investigate the evidence-based clinical tests which were used to evaluate and diagnose the urinary incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Urinary incontinence can be diagnosed in two ways.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Adaptation of such a test so that it could be performed in primary care with a naturally filled bladder may prove clinically useful. • If a patient is to undergo an invasive urodynamic procedure, multichannel urodynamics is likely to give the most accurate result in a secondary care setting.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this review we aimed to investigate the evidence-based clinical tests which were used to evaluate and diagnose the urinary incontinence. Urinary incontinence can be diagnosed in two ways. Two types of diagnosis can be made: symptomatic diagnosis and condition specific diagnosis. In general, symptomatic diagnoses are made in primary care using clinical history-taking, urinary diaries, pad tests and validated symptom scales. Condition-specific diagnoses are made by using urodynamic techniques.• A large proportion of women with urinary stress incontinence can be correctly diagnosed in primary care from clinical history alone. • On the basis of diagnosis the diary appears to be the most cost-effective of the three primary care tests (diary, pad test and validated scales) used in addition to clinical history. • Ultrasound imaging may offer a valuable information about urinary incontinence • The clinical stress test is effective in the diagnosis of urinary stress incontinence. Adaptation of such a test so that it could be performed in primary care with a naturally filled bladder may prove clinically useful. • If a patient is to undergo an invasive urodynamic procedure, multichannel urodynamics is likely to give the most accurate result in a secondary care setting.

Özet

Bu makalede üriner inkontinans tanı ve değerlendirme sürecinde uygulanan klinik testlerin kanıt temelli incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. İnkontinansta tanı iki Şekilde konulabilmektedir. Birincisi semptomatik tanı koyma yöntemi, ikincisi duruma özel tanı koyma yöntemidir. Genelde semptomatik tanı hastanın anamnezi, üriner günlük, ped test ve geçerliliği yapılmış ölçeklerle konulmaktadır. Duruma özel tanı koymada ise ürodinamik teknikler kullanılmaktadır. • Stres inkontinanslı kadınların büyük bir bölümüne yalnızca klinik anamnez ile doğru tanı konulabilir. • Tanı koyarken klinik öyküye ilaveten kullanılan üç testin(günlük, ped test ve geçerliliği yapılmış ölçek) en maliyet etkin olanı günlüktür. • Ultrason görüntüleme ile üriner inkontinans değerlendirmesinde önemli bilgilere ulaşılabilir. • Stres inkontinansın tanılanmasında klinik stres test etkilidir. Bu tür bir test primer bakım verilen merkezlerde doğal olarak dolmuş bir mesane ile yapılabilir ve bu yöntemin klinik olarak geçerliliği kanıtlanmıştır. • Eğer hastaya invaziv ürodinamik girişimde bulunulacaksa sekonder bakım verilen merkezlerde multikanal ürodinamik testin uygulanması ile en doğru sonuçlar alınabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILKAYA, N. B., DEMİRGÖZ, M. B., YALÇIN, Ö., DERELİ, S. Y. (2022). Investigation of evidence-based tests which were used to evaluate and diagnose process of urinary incontinence. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 153–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/631586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akgül A, Çevik O. İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri SPSS'de İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları
  2. Baskı. Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti: Ankara; 2005
  3. Hijaz A, Daneshgari F. Office evaluation of urinary incontinence. In: Goldman HB, Vasavada SP, eds. Female Urology A Practical Clinical Guide. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press Inc; 2007. p.35- 9
  4. Walters MD. Evaluation of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse:history, physical examination, and office tests. In: Walters MD, Karram MM, eds. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. 3rd eds. Philadephia USA: Elsevier Inc; 2007. p. 65- 78
  5. Abrams P, Lowry SK, Wein AJ, Bump R, Denis L, Kalache A. Assessment and treatment of urinary incontinence. Lancet 2000; 355: 2153 -8
  6. JL Martin, KS Williams, KR Abrams,DA, et all. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10(6): 1- 132
  7. Lagro-Janssen AL, Debruyne FM, van Weel C. Value of the patient's case history in diagnosing urinary incontinence in general practice. Br J Urol 1991; 67(6): 569- 72
  8. Khan MS, Chaliha C, Leskova L, Khullar V. The relationship between urinary symptom questionnaires and urodynamic diagnoses: an analysis of two methods of questionnaire administration. BJOG 2004; 111(5): 468- 74
  9. Robinson D, Pearce KF, Preisser JS, Dugan E, Suggs PK, Cohen SJ. Relationship between patient reports of urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life measures. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 224- 8
  10. Bergman A, Bader K. Reliability of the patient’s history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990; 32: 255- 9
  11. Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, Carchidi LT, DeLancey JO. On the lack of correlation between self-report and urine loss measured with standing provocation test in older stressincontinent women. J Womens Health 1999; 8: 157- 62
  12. Elser DM, Fantl JA, McClish DK. Comparison of ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ measures of severity of urinary incontinence in women. Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 1995; 14: 311- 6
  13. Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 805- 12
  14. Romanzi LJ, Polaneczky M, Glazer HI. Simple test of pelvic muscle contraction during pelvic examination: correlation to surface electromyography. Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 603-12
  15. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McCli