Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Türk kadınının vajinal doğum hakkındaki görüşü nedir?

What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?

Pages
75–78
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results suggest the majority of women prefer to give birth vaginally and reported vaginal birth as the ideal choice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine Turkish women s opinion about vaginal birth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Süleymaniye Maternity Research and Training Hospital in İstanbul, Turkey, between February 2015 and April 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results suggest the majority of women prefer to give birth vaginally and reported vaginal birth as the ideal choice.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine Turkish women s opinion about vaginal birth. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Süleymaniye Maternity Research and Training Hospital in İstanbul, Turkey, between February 2015 and April 2015. The participants of this study were 100 primiparous pregnant women who had vaginal deliveries. The women were interviewed face-to-face after the birth. Data were collected through a socio-demographic and clinical questionnaire. Results: Ninety percent of the women reported vaginal birth as the ideal mode of delivery route; a minority of the women (10%) had decided on cesarean birth before having a vaginal birth. Anxiety of pain was the major factor that influenced choice of delivery type before giving birth. After vaginal birth, 84% of women were satisfied with vaginal birth and reported that they would prefer vaginal birth for their next pregnancy. However, 16% reported that they would prefer cesarean birth for their next pregnancy due to pain of labor, pain of episiotomy, anxiety, and prolonged duration of labor. Conclusion: The results suggest the majority of women prefer to give birth vaginally and reported vaginal birth as the ideal choice. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:75-8

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma Türk kadınının vajinal doğum hakkındaki görüşünü belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu prospektif kohort çalışma, Şubat 2015 ve Nisan 2015 arasında İstanbulda Süleymaniye Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde yürütüldü. Bu çalışmanın katılımcıları vajinal doğum yapan 100 primipar gebe idi. Bu 100 primipar gebeye, vajinal doğum sonrası yüz yüze anket yapıldı. Veriler sosyo-demografik ve klinik anketler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan gebelerin %90ı doğum öncesinde ideal doğum şekli olarak vajinal doğumu, gebelerin %10u ise sezaryen doğumu tercih etmişlerdir. Doğumdan önce doğum tercihini etkileyen en önemli faktör ağrı anksiyetesi idi. Vajinal doğum sonrası kadınların %84ü vajinal doğumdan memnun olduklarını ve bir sonraki gebelik için vajinal doğumu tercih edeceklerini bildirdi. Ancak, kadınların %16sı travay ağrısı, epizyotomi ağrısı, ağrı anksiyetesi, uzun travay üresi gibi nedenlerle bir sonraki gebelik için sezaryen doğumu tercih edeceklerini bildirmişlerdir. Sonuç: Sonuçlar; kadınların çoğunun doğum öncesinde doğum şekli olarak vajinal doğumu tercih ettiğini ve ideal doğum şekli olarak vajinal doğumu gördüklerini göstermektedir. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:75-8

🔖

Cite This Article

EKEN, M., ÖZEL, A., GÜNGÖR, E. S., İLHAN, G., ATMACA, F. V. F., TAVUKÇUOĞLU, Z., ÖZDEMİR, M. (2022). Türk kadınının vajinal doğum hakkındaki görüşü nedir?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 75–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/631442

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hacettepe Universitiy Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey Main Report 2008. Avaliable from: http:/www.hipshacettepe. edu.tr
  2. World Health Organization. The World Health Statistics report 2010. 2011. Avaliable from: http: //www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2010/ en/
  3. Hacettepe Universitiy Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey Main Report 2008. Avaliable from: http:/www.hipshacettepe. edu.tr/tnsa2013/data/TNSA-2013-anaRapor-tr.pdf
  4. No authors listed. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436-7
  5. O’ Boyle AL, O’ Boyle JD, Calhoun B, Davis GD. Pelvic organ support in pregnancy and postpartum. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16:69-72
  6. Delancey JO, Kane Low L, Miller JM, Patel DA, Tumbarello JA. Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:610-5
  7. Landon MB, Spongy CY, Thomas E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:12-20
  8. Visco AG, Viswanathan M, Lohr KN, Wechter ME, Gartlehner G, Wu JM, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal ad neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1517-29
  9. Gee H. Caesarean section should be available on request: For: the mother’s autonomy should be paramount. BJOG 2015;122:359
  10. Silver RM. AGAINTS: Caesarean delivery on maternal request is a bad idea. BJOG 2015;122:360
  11. Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesare an section and experience of childbirth. BJOG 2006;113:638-46
  12. Wiklund I, Edman G, Ryding EL, Andolf E. Expectations and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesare an section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:324-31
  13. Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Women’s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:807-13
  14. Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U. Fewwomenwishto be deliveredbycaesareansection. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:618-23
  15. Kringeland T, Daltveit AK, Møller A. What characterizes women in Norway who wish to have a cesarean section. Scand J Public Health 2009;37:364-71
  16. Karlström A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I. Behind the myth–few women prefer cesarean sec