Journals / BİLTÜRK Ekonomi ve İlişkili Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4

Comparative Analysis of The Relationships among Economic Growth, Globalization and R & D: The Case of Turkey & South Korea

Pages
271–296
Publication Date
2019-10-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the ARDL method, the models created using the annual data for the period 1991-2016 for each 2 (two) countries were cointegrated between the variables in the long run, ie the linear compositions converged to the equilibrium point.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The reason for selecting the scope of the study Turkey and South Korea; the development efforts of these countries of basic macro-economic indicators, from the outset despite being close to each other in terms of development in recent years, South Korea is the clear future of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results obtained from the ARDL method, the models created using the annual data for the period 1991-2016 for each 2 (two) countries were cointegrated between the variables in the long run, ie the linear compositions converged to the equilibrium point.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of a deviation from the equilibrium occur in the future can be said South Korea could improve faster than in Turkey.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Güney Kore · ARDL · AR&GE

Abstract

The reason for selecting the scope of the study Turkey and South Korea; the development efforts of these countries of basic macro-economic indicators, from the outset despite being close to each other in terms of development in recent years, South Korea is the clear future of Turkey. In this study, it is aimed to determine and compare the effect of research and investment investments and globalization index and the relationship between real GDP per capita and these variables by ARDL approach. According to the results obtained from the ARDL method, the models created using the annual data for the period 1991-2016 for each 2 (two) countries were cointegrated between the variables in the long run, ie the linear compositions converged to the equilibrium point. All coefficients are statistically the created models for the prediction of long-term coefficients South Korea is pointless to more significantly in Turkey. For South Korea, it can be said that there is a positive relationship between real GDP per capita, research and development investments and globalization index. 1% increase in research and development investments and globalization index will lead to a 0.27% and 1.53% increase in real GDP per capita in the long run, respectively. The fact that the coefficients of error correction models are negative and the probability value is less than 0.05 indicates that the error correction coefficients are significant. According to the results of a deviation from the equilibrium occur in the future can be said South Korea could improve faster than in Turkey.

Özet

The reason for selecting the scope of the study Turkey and South Korea; the development efforts of these countries of basic macro-economic indicators, from the outset despite being close to each other in terms of development in recent years, South Korea is the clear future of Turkey. In this study, it is aimed to determine and compare the effect of research and investment investments and globalization index and the relationship between real GDP per capita and these variables by ARDL approach. According to the results obtained from the ARDL method, the models created using the annual data for the period 1991-2016 for each 2 (two) countries were cointegrated between the variables in the long run, ie the linear compositions converged to the equilibrium point. All coefficients are statistically the created models for the prediction of long-term coefficients South Korea is pointless to more significantly in Turkey. For South Korea, it can be said that there is a positive relationship between real GDP per capita, research and development investments and globalization index. 1% increase in research and development investments and globalization index will lead to a 0.27% and 1.53% increase in real GDP per capita in the long run, respectively. The fact that the coefficients of error correction models are negative and the probability value is less than 0.05 indicates that the error correction coefficients are significant. According to the results of a deviation from the equilibrium occur in the future can be said South Korea could improve faster than in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELİK, Ö., GÖKSU, S. (2019). Comparative Analysis of The Relationships among Economic Growth, Globalization and R & D: The Case of Turkey & South Korea. BİLTÜRK Ekonomi ve İlişkili Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4, 271–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/6294

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acaravcı, A. Akalin, G. ve Erdoğan, S. (2019). Araştırma Geliştirme Harcamalarının Türkiye İhracatına Etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 37(1). s. 1-16.
  2. Akbey, F. (2014). Ar&Ge, İnovasyon ve Kalkınma İlişkisine Yönelik Bir Literatür Taraması: Kuramsal Özet Maliye Dergisi Sayı 166. Akın, B. (2001). Yeni Ekonomi. (1. Basım). Çizgi Kitapevi Yayınları, Konya. Altın.O & Kaya, A. A. (2009). Türkiye’de Ar&Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensel İlişkinin Analizi. Ege Academic Review. 9 (1) 2009: 251-259
  3. Bayraktutan, Y. Arslan İ. ve Alancıoğlu E. (2018). Orta Gelir Tuzağını Aşmada Araştırma-Geliştirme: Türkiye Ve Güney Kore Karşılaştırması. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR). 5. 1232-1240. 10.26450/jshsr.473. Bozkurt, C. (2015). R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth Relationship in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 188-198
  4. Choi, C.&Hoon Yi, M. (2018)
  5. The Internet, R&D expenditure and economic growth, Applied Economics Letters, 25:4, 264-267, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1316819 Demir, İ. C.&Balkı, A. (2019).Türkiye’de Wagner Kanunu’nun Sınanması: 1960 – 2016
  6. Dönemi Analizi. Vergi Raporu, Mart 2019, Sayı: 234, s.20-21
  7. Dickey, D.A.&Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Econometrica, 49, pp.1057-1072, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912517?origin=crossref&seq-=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  8. Doruk, Ö. T. & Söylemezoğlu, E. (2014), Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Ar-Ge’ye Dayalı Büyümenin Varlığının Sınanması. 1. Ulusal Üretim Ekonomisi Kongresi, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2541083.
  9. Duman, K & Aydın, K. (2018). Türkiye’de Ar&Ge Harcamaları ile Gsyih İlişkisi. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 2018; 4(1): 49-66
  10. Engle, R.F.&Granger C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55, pp. 251-276, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913236?origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  11. Freimane, R. & Balina, S. (2016). Research and De¬velopment Expenditures and Economic Growth in the EU: A Panel Data Analysis, Economics and Business, 29 (1), 5 - 11. Gittleman, M.&Wolff, E. (1995), R&D Activity and Cross-Country Growth Comparisons, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, issue 1, p. 189-207, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:189-207.
  12. Johansen, S.&Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and In