SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Normal Türk kadın popülasyonunda kemik mineral yoğunluğu

Bone mineral density in a normal Turkish female population

Şansın TÜZÜN
Fikret TÜZÜN
Nedim SELİM
İlhan KARACAN
Pages
10–16
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In comparison with USA and Northern European data, BMD values in Turkish women were lower at lumbar spine, whereas their femoral BMDs were similar to USA values but lower than Europeans in the 5th and 7th decades.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the range of bone mineral density (BMD) in a normal Turkish female population and to compare them to USA and Northern European data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:BMD measurements were performed at four sites (antero-posterior spine, femur, ultradistal radius, total body) in 339 women aged 20-79 years using a Lunar DPX densitometer at 19 different centers from different areas of the country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In comparison with USA and Northern European data, BMD values in Turkish women were lower at lumbar spine, whereas their femoral BMDs were similar to USA values but lower than Europeans in the 5th and 7th decades.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the range of bone mineral density (BMD) in a normal Turkish female population and to compare them to USA and Northern European data. BMD measurements were performed at four sites (antero-posterior spine, femur, ultradistal radius, total body) in 339 women aged 20-79 years using a Lunar DPX densitometer at 19 different centers from different areas of the country. There was a linear correlation between BMD and both body weight and body mass index especially in postmenopausal stage. Spinal peak bone density (PBD) was reached in the 30-39 year age group whereas femoral PBD was reached in the 20-29 age group. The major fall in the BMD was observed after 50 years related to the menopause at all measurement sites. BMD showed a parabolic decline with aging. There was a cubic decreasing trend in BMD values at all sites related to the time since menopause. In comparison with USA and Northern European data, BMD values in Turkish women were lower at lumbar spine, whereas their femoral BMDs were similar to USA values but lower than Europeans in the 5th and 7th decades.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı normal Türk kadın popülasyonunda kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) aralığını saptamak ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) ve Kuzey Avrupa verileri ile karşılaştırmaktı. Ülkenin 19 farklı merkezinde Lunar DPX dansitometri cihazı ile 20-79 yaş arası 339 kadında KMY ölçümü yapıldı. Özellikle postmenopozal dönemde KMY ile vücut ağırlığı ve vücut kitle indeksi arasında doğrusal korelasyon saptandı. Spinal doruk kemik kütlesine (DKK) 30-39 yaş grubunda, fakat femoral DKK’ne 20-29 yaş grubunda ulaşılmaktaydı. Tüm ölçüm bölgelerinde, menopozla ilişkili olarak 50 yaşından sonra belirgin KMY kaybı saptandı. KMY yaşla parabolik azalma göstermekteydi. Menopoz süresi ile ilişkili olarak tüm bölgelerde KMY’unda kubik azalma olmaktaydı. ABD ve Kuzey Avrupa ülkeleri ile karşılaştırıldığında Türk kadınlarda lomber bölge KMY daha düşük bulundu, fakat femoral KMY 5. ve 7.dekadda Kuzey Avrupalılardan daha düşük, ABD’lilerle ise benzer düzeyde idi.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜZÜN, Ş., TÜZÜN, F., SELİM, N., KARACAN, İ. (2022). Normal Türk kadın popülasyonunda kemik mineral yoğunluğu. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 10–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/629292

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kanis JA. Osteoporosis. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1994
  2. Avioli LV, Kleerekoper M. Osteoporosis: the clinical problem. In: Genant HK, Guglielmi G, Jergas M, eds. Bone densitometry and osteoporosis. Berlin;Springer-Verlag,1998:1-15
  3. Dinç H, Sadikoğlu Y, Savci G, Demirci A et al. Bone mineral density measurement by quantitative computed tomography in a normal Turkish population. Eur J Radiol 1995;21(2):79-83
  4. Scientific Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. J Bone Miner Res 1989 (Supp1 2):1-8
  5. Petley GW, Cotton AM, Murrills AJ, Taylor PA et al. Reference ranges of bone mineral density for women in southern England: the impact of local data on the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1996;69(823):655-60
  6. Deleze M, Cons-Molina F, Villa F, Morales-Torres J et al. Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican Women. Osteoporosis Int 2000;11:562-9
  7. Heldan de Moura Castro C, Medeiros Pinherio M, Lucia Szejnfeld V. Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in Brazilian Caucasian Women: Normative data are similar to the manufacturer’s normal range. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:923-8
  8. Maalouf G, Salem S, Sandid M, Attallah P et al. Bone mineral density of the Lebanese reference population. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:756-64
  9. Faulkner KG, McClung MR. Quality of control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials. Osteoporosis Int 1995;5:218-27
  10. Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Barden H. DPX reference data Poster presentation at the 12th International Bone Density Workshop, May 18-22, 1997, Edinburg, Scotland 11. Mazess RB, Chesnut CH III, McClung M, Genant H. Enhanced precision with dual energy x-ray absorbtiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:14-7 12. Curiel MD, de la Pena JLC, Perez JH, Mullock BM, et al. Study of bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femoral neck in a Spanish population. Osteoporosis Int 1997; 7:59-64
  11. Yu W, Qin M, Xu L, van Kuijk C, et al. Normal changes in spinal bone mineral density in a Chinese population: Assesment by Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 1999;9:179-87
  12. Polatti F, Capuzzo E, Viazzo F, Colleoni R, et al. Bone mineral changes during and after lactation. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94(1):52-6
  13. Ghannam NN, Hammami MM, Bakheet SM, Khan BA. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudi females: relation to vitamin D status, pregnancy, and lactation. Calcif Tissue Int 1999;65(