SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Accessory navicular bone mimicking navicular fracture after ankle sprain

Ayak bileği burkulması sonrası naviküler kırığı taklit eden aksesuar naviküler kemik

Ülkü AKARIRMAK
Muharrem ÇİDEM
Kerem GÜN
Murat ULUDAĞ
Pages
172–174
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2011;57:172-4.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An accessory navicular bone (ANB) is present in 10-30% of normal feet.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most symptomatic ANBs are of type 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2011;57:172-4.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An accessory navicular bone (ANB) is present in 10-30% of normal feet. A morphological classification of ANB on the basis of the radiographic appearance distinguishes three types. Most symptomatic ANBs are of type 2. Although the diagnosis and treatment of sprained ankle are generally straightforward, together with an ANB, it might be misdiagnosed as afracture. We present a 20-year-old male with type 2 ANB who wasmisdiagnosed as navicular fracture following sprained ankle. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2011;57:172-4.

Özet

Aksesuar naviküler kemik (ANK) normal ayakta %10-30 oranında görülür. Radyografik görünüme göre ANK’nin morfolojik sınıflaması 3’e ayrılır. En semptomatik ANK Tip 2’dir. Ayak bileği burkulmasının tanı ve tedavisi genellikle basit olmasına rağmen ANK ile birlikte bulunduğunda kırık tanı sı alabilir. Biz de ayak bileği burkulmasına bağlı ağrı ve şişlik sonrası navi küler kırık olarak değerlendirilerek alçıda kalan ve eklem hareketlerinde kısıtlılık gelişen Tip 2 ANK’li 20 yaşında bir erkek hastayı sunuyoruz. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 2011;57:172-4.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKARIRMAK, Ü., ÇİDEM, M., GÜN, K., ULUDAĞ, M. (2022). Accessory navicular bone mimicking navicular fracture after ankle sprain. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 172–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/628987

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Requejo SM, Kulig K, Thordarson DB. Management of foot pain associated with accessory bones of the foot: two clinical case reports. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000;30:580-91
  2. Issever AS, Minden K, Eshed I, Hermann KGA. Accessory navicular bone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle. Clin Rheumatol 2007;26:2143-4
  3. Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M, Arican RY, Ozdemir H, Bircan, et al. Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 2009;31:19-24
  4. Kiter E, Erduran M, Gunal I. Inheritance of the accessory navicular bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120:582-3
  5. Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker FM, van de Perre S, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. Accessory navicular bone: not such a normal variant. JBR-BTR 2004;87:250-2
  6. Chen YJ, Hsu RW, Liang SC. Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1791-8
  7. Walia KS, Muser DE, Raza SS, Griech T, Khan YN. A management of early CRPS caused by ankle sprain: a case report. Pain Practice 2004;4:303-6
  8. Romanowski CA, Barrington NA. The accessory navicular- an important cause of medial foot pain. Clin Radiol 1992;46:261-4
  9. Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA. The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle 1989;10:164-9.