Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3

Turkish translation and adaptation of foot function ındex in patients with plantar fasciitis

Ayak fonksiyon indeksi'nin plantar fasiitli hastalarda Türkçe'ye çeviri ve adaptasyonu

Pages
212–222
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Eventually, the fnal version of the index was preparedaccording to the target population to perform reliability and validity.Conclusion: It was considered that the successfully translated andadapted Turkish version of the Foot Function Index provides anassessment for pain, disability, and activity limitation for foot diseasesand encourages further research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to translate the Foot Function Indexinto Turkish and perform its cross-cultural adaptation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A pilot test was carried out with 20 patientswho had plantar fasciitis.Results: The cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to therequired steps, and after the harmonization step, the consensus versionof the index was applied to the pilot group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Eventually, the fnal version of the index was preparedaccording to the target population to perform reliability and validity.Conclusion: It was considered that the successfully translated andadapted Turkish version of the Foot Function Index provides anassessment for pain, disability, and activity limitation for foot diseasesand encourages further research.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to translate the Foot Function Indexinto Turkish and perform its cross-cultural adaptation. Material and Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation of the FootFunction Index was performed according to the recommendations of theInternational Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research(ISPOR) guideline, which consists of translation, back translation,harmonization, pilot testing, review of results, corrections, and fnalreport steps, respectively. A pilot test was carried out with 20 patientswho had plantar fasciitis.Results: The cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to therequired steps, and after the harmonization step, the consensus versionof the index was applied to the pilot group. Generally, the translation wasclear and understandable for patients with plantar fasciitis. We modifedand added minor explanations in the information part and for questions7, 8, and 9 for pain, 3 and 8 for disability, and 2, 4, and 5 for activitylimitation to make the Foot Function Index appropriate for use in Turkish- speaking patients. Eventually, the fnal version of the index was preparedaccording to the target population to perform reliability and validity.Conclusion: It was considered that the successfully translated andadapted Turkish version of the Foot Function Index provides anassessment for pain, disability, and activity limitation for foot diseasesand encourages further research.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Foot Function Indexin (Ayak Fonksiyonİndeksi) Türkçe çeviri ve adaptasyonunu gerçekleştirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ayak fonksiyon indeksinin kültürel adaptasyonu,ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and OutcomesResearch) kılavuzuna uygun olarak çeviri, geri çeviri, harmonizasyon,deneme uygulaması, gözden geçirme, düzeltme ve sorgulama formununson halinin hazırlanması basamakları takip edilerek uygulandı. Plantarfasiitli 20 hasta ile deneme uygulaması yapıldı.Bulgular: Kültürel adaptasyon için sırasıyla gerekli basamaklar takipedilerek harmonizasyon basamağından sonra deneme uygulaması içinüzerinde uyum sağlanan taslak, pilot gruba uygulandı. Genel olaraktaslak plantar fasiitli hastalar tarafından açık ve anlaşılır bulundu. Ayakfonksiyon indeksinin Türkçe konuşan hastalara uygun hale getirilmesi içinağrının değerlendirildiği 7, 8 ve 9. sorular, yetersizliğin değerlendirildiği 3 ve 8. sorular ile aktivite kısıtlılığının değerlendirildiği 2, 4 ve 5.sorulardaki bazı terimler için değişikliklere ve açıklamalara ihtiyaçduyulmuştur. İndeksin son hali hedef popülasyona uygun olarak geçerlilikve güvenilirliğinin yapılması için hazırlandı.Sonuç: Ayak fonksiyon indeksinin Türkçe adaptasyonu başarıylagerçekleştirildi. Bu Türkçe versiyonun ayak hastalığı ile ilgili problemlerdeağrı, yetersizlik ve aktivite kısıtlılığının değerlendirilmesine olanaksağlayarak yapılacak çalışmalarda kullanılabileceği sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALIMAN, A., ŞEN, E. İ., BUDIMAN-MAK, E., ESKİYURT, N. (2022). Turkish translation and adaptation of foot function ındex in patients with plantar fasciitis. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3, 212–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/628802

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Menz HB, Jordan KP, Roddy E, Croft PR. Characteristics of primary care consultations for musculoskeletal foot and ankle problems in the UK. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1391-8
  2. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, Stuck RM. A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised. J Foot Ankle Res 2013;6:5
  3. Keenan AM, Tennant A, Fear J, Emery P, Conaghan PG. Impact of multiple joint problems on daily living tasks in people in the com- munity over age ffty-fve. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:757-64
  4. Hill CL, Gill T, Menz HB, Taylor AW. Prevalence and correlates of foot pain in a population-based study: the North West Adelaide Health Study. J Foot Ankle Res 2008;1:2
  5. Sayre EC, Li LC, Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Bar S, Cibere J. The effect of disease site (knee, hip, hand, foot, lower back or neck) on employ- ment reduction due to osteoarthritis. PLoS One 2010;5:10470
  6. Dall TM, Gallo P, Koenig L, Gu Q, Ruiz D. Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2013;11:5
  7. Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. Foot and ankle characteristics associ- ated with impaired balance and functional ability in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005;60:1546-52
  8. Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:866-70
  9. Barr EL, Browning C, Lord SR, Menz HB, Kendig H. Foot and leg problems are important determinants of functional status in com- munity dwelling older people. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:917-23
  10. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:561-70
  11. Agel J, Beskin JL, Brage M, Guyton GP, Kadel NJ, Saltzman CL, et al. Reliability of the Foot Function Index: a report of the AOFAS Outco- mes Committee. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:962-7
  12. Kuyvenhoven MM, Gorter KJ, Zuithoff P, Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Post MW. The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI- 5pt): a clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1023-8
  13. Landorf KB, Keenan AM. An evaluation of two foot-specifc, he- alth-related quality-of-life measuring instruments. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:538-46
  14. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37:72-84
  15. Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasc