SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osteoporoz Dünyasından / 2007 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Bone mineral density of stroke patients and it’s clinical relevance

İnmeli hastaların kemik mineral yoğunlukları ve klinikleri arasındaki ilişkiler

Nur KESİKTAŞ
Ayşe KARAN
Ayşe YALIMAN
Nurten ESKİYURT
Pages
49–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bigger sample sized, prospective studies must designed for observation of depression effect on osteoporosis in stroke. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:49-55)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study were to compare paretic and non- paretic side’s bone mineral density (BMD) and to investigate whether demographic, clinical and some laboaratory findings were correlated with bone mineral loss or not in stroke patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: 46 unilateral stroke patients mean aged 61.8±5.8 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bigger sample sized, prospective studies must designed for observation of depression effect on osteoporosis in stroke. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:49-55)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kemik yoğunluğu · İnme · Demografi

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study were to compare paretic and non- paretic side&#8217;s bone mineral density (BMD) and to investigate whether demographic, clinical and some laboaratory findings were correlated with bone mineral loss or not in stroke patients. Patients and Methods: 46 unilateral stroke patients mean aged 61.8±5.8 were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were evaluated. Brunnstrom motor recovery scale, Turkish version of the FIM, Ashworth scale, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used for assessments. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry&#8217;s Biochemical&#8217;s data were collected. Statistics were analyzed using SPSS version 10.0. Results: The BMDs of the paretic side were statistically significant lower than the non-paretic side at femoral neck BMD/T scores and distal radius T scores (p<0.05). BMDs and T scores of left sided stroke patients were statistically significant lower than non-paretic side at distal radius and femur, but BMD and T scores of right sided stroke patients were not statistically significant different than their non-paretic side BMD of women were statistically significant lower from than men&#8217;s BMD, (p<0.05) There were a correlation BDI and mobilization, r=-0,379 (p<0.05). Lower functional independence measurements score were found a relationship with osteoporosis. Conclussion: Low FIM scores can predict low BMD. Early walking and mobility must be targeted in stroke rehabilitation. Bigger sample sized, prospective studies must designed for observation of depression effect on osteoporosis in stroke. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:49-55)

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amacımız, inmeli hastalarda paretik ve nonparetik tarafların kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) değerlerini karşılaştırmak, kemik mineral kaybı varlığı ile demografik, klinik özellikler ve bazı laboratuar bulguları arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmektir. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Yaş ortalaması 61.8±5.8 yıl olan 46 tek taraflı inmeli hasta çalışmaya alındı. Klinik ve demografik özellikler değerlendirildi. Brunnstrom evrelemesi, fonksiyonel bağımsızlık ölçümünün Türkçe versiyonu (FBÖ), Ashworth skalası, Beck Depresyon Ölçeği (BDÖ) değerlendirmelerde kullanıldı. Dual-enerji X-ray absorpsiometri ile KMY biokimyasal veriler toplandı. İstatistikler SPSS versiyon 10.0 ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Paretik tarafın femur boynu KMY/T skorları ve distal radius T skoru paretik olmayan taraftan istatistiksel anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p<0.05). Sol hemiplejiklerin femur total ve distal radius KMY/T skorları paretik olmayan taraflarından daha düşüktü, fakat sağ hemiplejiklerde paretik olmayan tarafla anlamlı fark yoktu. Kadınların KMY’leri erkeklerin KMY’lerinden istatistiksel anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p<0.05). BDÖ ve mobilite arasında anlamlı korelasyon mevcuttu, r=-0,379 (p<0.05). Düşük FBÖ puanları ile osteoporoz varlığı arasında bir ilişki saptandı. Sonuç: Düşük FBÖ puanları düşük KMY’nin göstergesi olabilir. Erken yürüme ve mobilite inme rehabilitasyonunda hedef alınmalıdır. İnmeli hastalarda depresyonun osteoporoza etkisini gözlemlemek için daha büyük ölçekli, prospektif çalışmalar dizayn edilmelidir. (Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2007;13:49-55)

🔖

Cite This Article

KESİKTAŞ, N., KARAN, A., YALIMAN, A., ESKİYURT, N. (2007). Bone mineral density of stroke patients and it’s clinical relevance. Osteoporoz Dünyasından, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/286069

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. 1 Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet 1992
  2. 342–4. 2 Hatano S. Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ 1976
  3. 3 Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M et al. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981-86, I: methodology, demography and incident cases of first-ever stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988
  4. 4 Jorgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK. Bone mineral density in acute stroke patients: low bone mineral density may predict first stroke in women. Stroke 2001
  5. 5 Poole KES, Reeve J, Warburton EA. Falls, fractures, and osteoporosis after stroketime to think about protection?. Stroke 2002
  6. 6 Ramnemark A, Nilsson M, Borssén B et al. Stroke, a major and increasing risk factor for femoral neck fracture. Stroke 2000
  7. 7 Kanis J, Oden A, Johnell O. Acute and long-term increase in fracture risk after hospitalization for stroke. Stroke 2001
  8. 8 Jorgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK. Higher incidence of falls in long-term stroke survivors than in population controls. Depressive symptoms predict falls after stroke. Stroke 2002
  9. 9 Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Borsse´n B et al. Fractures after stroke. Osteoporos Int 1998
  10. 10 Jorgensen L, Jacobsen BK, Wilsgaard T et al. Walking after stroke: does it matter? Changes in bone mineral density within the first 12 months after stroke. A longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 2000
  11. 11 Sato Y, Kuno H, Kaji M et al. Increased bone resorption during the first year after stroke. Stroke 1998
  12. 12 Prince RL, Price RI, Ho S. Forearm bone loss in hemiplegia: a model for the study of immobilization osteoporosis. J Bone MinerRes 1988
  13. 13 Sato Y, Maruoka H, Oizumi K et al. Vitamin D deficiency and osteopenia in the hemiplegic limbs of stroke patients. Stroke 1996
  14. 14 Finestone HM, Greene Finestone LS, Wilson ES et al. Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: prevalence and predictors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995
  15. 15 del Puente A, PapponeN, Mandes MG et al. Determinants of bone mineral density in immobilization: a study on hemiplegic patients. Osteoporos Int. 1996
  16. 16 Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Lorentzon R et al. Hemiosteoporosis after severe stroke, independent of changes in body composition and weight. Stroke 1999
  17. 17 Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Lorentzon R