Strok Hastalarında Yaşam Kalitesi ve İlişkili Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi

Objective: This study aims to examine the overall and domain-specific quality of life in patients with stroke and to identify variables predicting quality of life after stroke.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to examine the overall and domain-specific quality of life in patients with stroke and to identify variables predicting quality of life after stroke.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 104 patients with sufficient cognitive functions having hemiplegia because of cerebrovascular accident and 108 controls were included in this study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Results: Patients had significantly lower scores in the quality of life subscores and total scores in comparison with the controls (p

🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the overall and domain-specific quality of life in patients with stroke and to identify variables predicting quality of life after stroke. Material and Methods: A total of 104 patients with sufficient cognitive functions having hemiplegia because of cerebrovascular accident and 108 controls were included in this study. Demographic and clinical features were recorded. The Barthel Index (BI) and Functional Ambulation Category scale were employed to assess the functional state of patients. Quality of life was evaluated by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey, whereas the emotional state of the patients was evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Functional status, motor impairment, and emotional state were determined as independent variables, and multiple regression analysis was used to predict quality of life. Results: Patients had significantly lower scores in the quality of life subscores and total scores in comparison with the controls (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı inmeli hastaların global ve spesifik alanlarda yaşam kalitesini değerlendirmek ve inme sonrası yaşam kalitesini etkileyen değişkenleri belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Serebrovasküler olaya bağlı hemiplejisi olan, kognitif fonksiyonları yeterli 104 hasta ve 108 sağlıklı kontrol çalışmaya alındı. Demografik ve klinik özellikler kaydedildi. Hastaların fonksiyonel durumlarını değerlendirmek için Barthel İndeksi (Bİ) ve Fonksiyonel Ambulasyon Sınıflaması kullanıldı. Yaşam kalitesi Kısa form 36 (SF-36) sağlık değerlendirme anketi ile, emosyonel durumları Hastane Anksiyete ve Depresyon Ölçeği (HADÖ) ile değerlendirildi. Fonksiyonel durum, motor bozukluk ve emosyonel durum bağımsız değişkenler olarak belirlendi ve yaşam kalitesini tahmin etmek için kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların total ve subtotal SF-36 skorları kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı düşüktü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAYAN, M., NAS, K., OKTAYOĞLU, P., VAROL, S., EM, S., KARAKOÇ, M., AKDENİZ, D., BOZKURT, M. (2022). Strok Hastalarında Yaşam Kalitesi ve İlişkili Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 148–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/628756

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

Garrison SJ, Rolak LA. Rehabilitation of the stroke patient. In: DeLisa JA, ed. Rehabilitation medicine: Principles and practice. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co, 1993. p.801-24
King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1996;27:1467-72. [CrossRef] 3. Kim P, Warren S, Madill H, Hadley M. Quality of life of stroke survivors. Qual Life Res 1999;8:293-301. [CrossRef] 4. Laurent K, De Sèze MP, Delleci C, Koleck M, Dehail P, Orgogozo JM, et al. Assessment of quality of life in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2011:54;376-90. [CrossRef] 5. Ware JE Jr. Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:43-51. [CrossRef] 6. van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limburg M, van den Bos GA. Clinical meaning of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 and the Sickness Impact Profile-136. Stroke 2000;31:2610-5. [CrossRef] 7. Ones K, Yilmaz E, Cetinkaya B, Caglar N. Quality of life for patients poststroke and the factors affecting it. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;14:261-6. [CrossRef] 8. Muro MJ, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Almazán J, Holmqvist LW. Stroke patients in south Madrid: function and motor recovery, resource utilization, and family support. Stroke 2000;31:1352-9. [CrossRef] 9. Hochstenbach JB, Anderson PG, van Limbeek J, Mulder TT. Is there a relation between neuropsychologic variables and quality of life after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1360-6. [CrossRef] 10. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez J, Varela de Seijas E. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke.Stroke 2000;31:2995-3000. [CrossRef] 11. Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Kotila M, Waltimo O. Quality of life 4 years after stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1101-7. [CrossRef] 12. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035-42. [CrossRef] 13. Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke: Results from the Auckland stroke study, 1991-1992. Stroke 2000;31:440-7. [CrossRef] 14. Murtezani A, Hundozi H, Gashi S, Osmani T, Krasniqi V, Rama B. Factors associated with reintegration to normal living after stroke. Med Arh 2009;63:216-9
Hackett ML, Anderson CS, House AO, Xia J. Interventions for treating depression after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;8:CD003437. [CrossRef] 16. Clarke PJ, Lawre