Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

Meme kanserli hastalarda level 3 aksiller lenf nodu diseksiyonu sonrası lenfödem prevalansı ve risk faktörlerinin araştırıldığı kesitsel çalışma

A cross-sectional study examining the risk factors associated with lymphedema and its prevalence in breast cancer patients after level 3 axillary lymph node dissection

Pages
36–44
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, chemotherapy, breast orchest wall radiotherapy, and axillary radiotherapy also played a role.In the multivariate model, BMI (OR=5.491; 95% CI: 1.382-21.82),metastatic LNs (OR=0.314; 95% CI: 0.118-0.839), axillary radiotherapy(OR=15.34; 95% CI: 5.526-42.581), chemotherapy (OR=5.325; 95%CI: 1.48-19.153), and age (OR=1.044; 95% CI: 1.007-1.083) weresignifcantly associated with an increased risk of lymphedema.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was a higherlymphedema prevalence ratio of 41.5% in breast cancer patients whounderwent level 3 ALND and found that the risk factors for lymphedemadevelopment were axillary radiotherapy, chemotherapy, number ofmetastatic LNs, age, and BMI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the prevalance of lymphedema after breastcancer treatment with level 3 axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)and to evaluate the risk factors which underlie this condition.Material and Methods: A total of 190 women >18-years-old whounderwent breast cancer treatment with level 3 ALND >6 monthsago were included in this cross-sectional study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sociodemographicand clinical characteristics of all of the patients were recorded, and allpatients were evaluated for lymphedema of the upper extremity by acircumferential measurement method.Results: On examination, 79 (41.5%) women had lymphedemawith a mean development time of 12.7±26.62 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, chemotherapy, breast orchest wall radiotherapy, and axillary radiotherapy also played a role.In the multivariate model, BMI (OR=5.491; 95% CI: 1.382-21.82),metastatic LNs (OR=0.314; 95% CI: 0.118-0.839), axillary radiotherapy(OR=15.34; 95% CI: 5.526-42.581), chemotherapy (OR=5.325; 95%CI: 1.48-19.153), and age (OR=1.044; 95% CI: 1.007-1.083) weresignifcantly associated with an increased risk of lymphedema.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was a higherlymphedema prevalence ratio of 41.5% in breast cancer patients whounderwent level 3 ALND and found that the risk factors for lymphedemadevelopment were axillary radiotherapy, chemotherapy, number ofmetastatic LNs, age, and BMI.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalance of lymphedema after breastcancer treatment with level 3 axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)and to evaluate the risk factors which underlie this condition.Material and Methods: A total of 190 women >18-years-old whounderwent breast cancer treatment with level 3 ALND >6 monthsago were included in this cross-sectional study. The sociodemographicand clinical characteristics of all of the patients were recorded, and allpatients were evaluated for lymphedema of the upper extremity by acircumferential measurement method.Results: On examination, 79 (41.5%) women had lymphedemawith a mean development time of 12.7±26.62 months. Afterunivariate analysis, the patients age, body mass index (BMI), andnumber of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) were found to increase thedevelopment of lymphedema. In addition, chemotherapy, breast orchest wall radiotherapy, and axillary radiotherapy also played a role.In the multivariate model, BMI (OR=5.491; 95% CI: 1.382-21.82),metastatic LNs (OR=0.314; 95% CI: 0.118-0.839), axillary radiotherapy(OR=15.34; 95% CI: 5.526-42.581), chemotherapy (OR=5.325; 95%CI: 1.48-19.153), and age (OR=1.044; 95% CI: 1.007-1.083) weresignifcantly associated with an increased risk of lymphedema.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was a higherlymphedema prevalence ratio of 41.5% in breast cancer patients whounderwent level 3 ALND and found that the risk factors for lymphedemadevelopment were axillary radiotherapy, chemotherapy, number ofmetastatic LNs, age, and BMI.

Özet

Amaç: Meme kanseri tedavisinde, level 3 aksiller lenf nodu diseksiyonu(ALND) yapılan hastalarda lenfödem prevalansını belirlemek ve budurumun altında yatan nedenleri değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Meme kanseri tedavisi sonrası en az 6 aysüre geçmiş, level 3 ALND yapılmış, 18 yaş üstü, 190 kadın hastaçalışmaya dahil edildi. Çalışma kesitsel olarak gerçekleştirildi. Hastalarınsosyodemografk ve klinik özellikleri kayıt edildi, tüm hastalarçevresel ölçüm yöntemiyle üst esktremite lenfödem varlığı açısındandeğerlendirildi. Bulgular: Değerlendirmede 79 (%41,5) hastada lenfödem tespit edildive ortalama lenfödem gelişme süresi 12,7±26,62 ay olarak saptandı. Tekdeğişkenli analiz sonucunda yaş, beden kitle indeksi (BKİ), metastatikenf nodu (LN) sayısının lenfödemin gelişimini arttırdığı, bunun yanındakemoterapi, meme veya göğüs bölgesine radyoterapi ve aksillerradyoterapinin de etkili olduğu bulundu. Çok değişkenli modeldeyse,BKİ (OR=5,491; %95 CI: 1,382-21,82), metastatik LN sayısı (OR=0,314;%95 CI: 0,118-0,839), aksiller radyoterapi (OR=15,34; %95 CI:5,526-42,581), kemoterapi (OR=5,325; %95 CI: 1,48-19,153), ve yaş(OR=1,044; %95 CI: 1,007-1,083) ile lenfödem riski arasında anlamlılişki gösterildi.Sonuç: Bu çalışma level 3 ALND yapılan meme kanseri hastalarındaenfödem prevalans oranının %41,5 gibi yüksek bir oranda olduğunugöstermiş ve aksiller radyoterapi, BKİ, metastatik LN sayısı, yaş vekemoterapinin lenfödem gelişiminde etkili risk faktörleri olduğunubulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSEOĞLU, B. F., KİBAR, S., ÜNSAL, S. D., DALYAN, M. A. (2022). Meme kanserli hastalarda level 3 aksiller lenf nodu diseksiyonu sonrası lenfödem prevalansı ve risk faktörlerinin araştırıldığı kesitsel çalışma. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 36–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/628752

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Hinrichs CS, Watroba NL, Rezaishiraz H, Giese W, Hurd T, Fassl KA, et al. Lymhedema secondary to postmastectomy radiation: incidence and risk factors. Ann Surg Oncol 2004
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Park JH, Lee WH, Chung HS. Incidence and risk factors of breast cancer lymphoedema. J Clin Nurs 2008
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Hayes SC, Johansson K, Stout NL, Prosnitz R, Armer JM, Gabram S, et al. Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveil- lance model of care. Cancer 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Harris SR, Hugi MR, Olivotto IA, Levine M. Steering committee for clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast can- cer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: II. Lymphedema. CMAJ 2001
  5. Kwan W, Jackson J, Weir LM, Dingee C, McGregor G, Olivotto IA. Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: pre- valence and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2002
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Newman B. Lymphedema following breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Bar Ad V, Dutta PR, Solin LJ, Hwang WT, Tan KS, Both S, et al. Time- course of arm lymphedema and potential risk factors for progres- sion of lymphedema after breast conservation treatment for early stage breast cancer. Breast J 2012
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Bennett Britton TM, Purushotham AD. Understanding Breast Can- cer-Related Lymphoedema. Surgeon 2009
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone PA. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2009
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Warren LE, Miller CL, Horick N, Skolny MN, Jammallo LS, Sadek BT, et al. The impact of radiation therapy on the risk of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Fey JV, Cody HS 3rd, Borgen PI, Van Zee KJ. Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive senti- nel node? A validated normogram for risk estimation. J Clin Oncol 2007
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Bevilacqua JL, Kattan MW, Changhong Y, Koifman S, Mattos IE, Ko- ifman RJ, et al. Nomograms for predicting the risk of arm lymphe- dema after axillary dissection in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012
  13. [CrossRef] 13. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence