Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1

Spina bifda and rehabilitation

Spina bifda ve rehabilitasyonu

Pages
65–69
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, a rehabilitation program,starting at infancy and continuing during the lifetime, should be familycentered and should be conducted with a multidisciplinary team.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spina bifda (SB) is the incomplete closure of the posterior elements ofthe vertebrae due to a developmental disorder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among the causes ofchildhood disability, SB is the second most common cause after cerebralpalsy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, a rehabilitation program,starting at infancy and continuing during the lifetime, should be familycentered and should be conducted with a multidisciplinary team.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Spina bifda (SB) is the incomplete closure of the posterior elements ofthe vertebrae due to a developmental disorder. Among the causes ofchildhood disability, SB is the second most common cause after cerebralpalsy. Generally, secondary motor neuron fndings are seen below thelesion.The ambulation grade and the orthoses used by patients varyaccording to the level of the lesion. SB patients experience variouscomplications throughout their lives. The purpose of SB rehabilitationis to prevent these complications and to keep the patient s functionalstatus at the best possible level. Therefore, a rehabilitation program,starting at infancy and continuing during the lifetime, should be familycentered and should be conducted with a multidisciplinary team.

Özet

Spina bifda (SB), gelişimsel bozukluk nedeniyle vertebra arkaelemanlarının tam olarak kapanmamasıdır. Çocukluk çağı engelliliknedenleri arasında serebral palsiden sonra ikinci sıklıktadır. Genelliklelezyon altında ikinci motor nöron bulguları görülür; ambulasyon düzeyive hastaların kullandığı ortezler lezyon seviyesine göre değişir. SBlihastalar hayatları boyunca çeşitli komplikasyonlarla karşı karşıyadır. SBrehabilitasyonunda amaç, bu komplikasyonları önlemek ve hastanınfonksiyonel durumunu mümkün olan en iyi seviyede tutmaktır.Bu nedenle bebeklik döneminden başlayan ve ömür boyu sürenrehabilitasyon programı aile merkezli olmalı ve multidisipliner bir ekiplebirlikte yürütülmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZARAS, N. (2022). Spina bifda and rehabilitation. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 1, 65–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/628716

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Pico EL, Wilson PE, Haas R. Spina bifida. In: Alexander MA, Mat- thews DJ, editors. Pediatric rehabilitation. 4th ed. New York, USA: Demos Medical Publishing;2010.p. 199-230
  2. Rossi A, Biancheri R, Cama A, Piatelli G, Ravegnani M, Tortori-Do- nati P. Imaging in spine and spinal cord malformations. Eur J Radiol 2004;50:177-200. [CrossRef] 3. Copp AJ, Greene ND. Neural tube defects--disorders of neurulation and related embryonic processes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2013; 2:213-27. [CrossRef] 4. Gupta P, Kumar A, Kumar A, Goel S. Congenital spinal cord anomalies: a pictorial review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2013;42:57-66. [CrossRef] 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Racial/ethnic differences in the birth prevalence of spina bifida - United States, 1995-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;57:1409-13
  3. Au KS, Ashley-Koch A, Northrup H. Epidemiologic and genetic as- pects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2010;16:6-15. [CrossRef] 7. Onrat ST, Seyman H, Konuk M. Incidence of neural tube defects in Afyon- karahisar, Western Turkey. Genet Mol Res 2009;8:154-61. [CrossRef] 8. Fisk Green R, Byrne J, Crider KS, Gallagher M, Koontz D, Berry RJ. Folate-related gene variants in Irish families affected by neural tube defects. Front Genet 2013;4:223. [CrossRef] 9. Lembet A, Uğurlu EN, Toprak T, Bastu E. Rare case of spina bifida in both twins with possible genetic basis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011;37:1755-8. [CrossRef] 10. Osterhues A, Ali NS, Michels KB. The role of folic acid fortification in neural tube defects: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2013;53:1180-90. [CrossRef] 11. Trudell AS, Odibo AO. Diagnosis of spina bifida on ultrasound: Always termi - nation? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014;28:367-77. [CrossRef] 12. Buyukkurt S, Binokay F, Seydaoglu G, Gulec UK, Ozgunen FT, Evruke C, et al. Prenatal determination of the upper lesion level of spina bifida with three-dimensional ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33:36-40. [CrossRef] 13. Aygün C, Kurucu S, Cakmak Çelik F, Dağçınar A, Tanyeri B, Küçüködük S. Experience of a tertiary care center on 100 newborns with neural tube defects. Turk J Pediatr 2013;55:359-64
  4. Ben-Sira L, Garel C, Malinger G, Constantini S. Prenatal diagnosis of spinal dysraphism. Childs Nerv Syst 2013;29:1541-52. [CrossRef] 15. Danzer E, Johnson MP. Fetal surgery for neural tube defects. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;19:2-8. [CrossRef] 16. American College of Obstetricians