SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3

Profesyonel futbolcularda statik ve dinamik germe egzersizlerinin esneklik, çeviklik ve anaerobik performans üzerindeki akut etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on flexibility, agility and anaerobic performance in professional football players

Cem KURT
İlkay FIRTIN
Pages
206–213
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, static and/or dynamic stretching exercises can be applied in addition to aerobic running to enhance flexibility

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we compared the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on flexibility, agility, fatigue index and anaerobic performance in professional football players.Patients and methods: Between August 2013 and September 2013, a total of 20 professional football players (mean age, 25.3±4.3 years; height, 1.83±0.03 m; body mass, 79.1±4.1 kg; football experience, 11.1±2.2 years) completed three different warm-up sessions at 24-hour intervals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After each session, the athletes were evaluated in terms of stand and reach flexibility, Illinois agility, and running-based anaerobic sprint tests, respectively.Results: Analysis of variance indicated that “aerobic running combined with static stretching” increased agility (p≤0.05) and decreased relative average power, and relative maximum power (p≤0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, static and/or dynamic stretching exercises can be applied in addition to aerobic running to enhance flexibility
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we compared the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on flexibility, agility, fatigue index and anaerobic performance in professional football players.Patients and methods: Between August 2013 and September 2013, a total of 20 professional football players (mean age, 25.3±4.3 years; height, 1.83±0.03 m; body mass, 79.1±4.1 kg; football experience, 11.1±2.2 years) completed three different warm-up sessions at 24-hour intervals. First, second and third warmup sessions were named as “aerobic running”, “aerobic running combined with static stretching” and “aerobic running combined with dynamic stretching”, respectively. After each session, the athletes were evaluated in terms of stand and reach flexibility, Illinois agility, and running-based anaerobic sprint tests, respectively.Results: Analysis of variance indicated that “aerobic running combined with static stretching” increased agility (p≤0.05) and decreased relative average power, and relative maximum power (p≤0.05). However, no significant effect of static stretching on minimum power was detected (p>0.05). The fatigue index score was greater following “aerobic running” and “aerobic running combined with dynamic stretching” than following “aerobic running combined with static stretching”. We observed that aerobic running combined with static or dynamic stretching increased the flexibility more effectively than aerobic running alone (p≤0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that football players could prevent possible decreases in anaerobic performance by removing static stretching exercises from warm-up routines used before training and/or competitions. On the other hand, static and/or dynamic stretching exercises can be applied in addition to aerobic running to enhance flexibility

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, profesyonel futbolcularda statik ve dinamik germe egzersizlerinin esneklik, çeviklik, yorgunluk indeksi ve anaerobik performans üzerindeki akut etkileri karşılaştırıldı.Hastalar ve yöntemler: Ağustos 2013 - Eylül 2013 tarihleri arasında, toplam 20 profesyonel futbolcu (ort. yaş 25.3±4.3 yıl; boy uzunluğu, 1.83±0.03 m; vücut kütlesi, 79.1±4.1 kg; futbol deneyimi, 11.1±2.2 yıl), 24 saatlik aralıklarla uygulanan üç farklı ısınma seansını tamamladı. Birinci, ikinci ve üçüncü seanslar sırasıyla "aerobik koşu", "aerobik koşu ile birlikte statik germe" ve "aerobik koşu ile birlikte dinamik germe" seansı olarak adlandırıldı. Her bir seansın sonunda sporcular sırasıyla durarak uzanma esneklik, Illinois çeviklik ve koşuya dayalı anaerobik sprint testleri açısından değerlendirildiBulgular: Varyans analizi, "aerobik koşu ile birlikte statik germe"nin çeviklik performansını artırdığını (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KURT, C., FIRTIN, İ. (2022). Profesyonel futbolcularda statik ve dinamik germe egzersizlerinin esneklik, çeviklik ve anaerobik performans üzerindeki akut etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3, 206–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/628648

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011;111:2633-51
  2. Franco BL, Signorelli GR, Trajano GS, Costa PB, de Oliveira CG. Acute effects of three different stretching protocols on the wingate test performance. J Sports Sci Med 2012;11:1-7
  3. Bradley PS, Olsen PD, Portas MD. The effect of static, ballistic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 2007;2:223-6
  4. McMillian DJ, Moore JH, Hatler BS, Taylor DC. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: the effect on power and agility performance. J Strength Cond Res 2006;20:492-9
  5. Murphy JR, Di Santo MC, Alkanani T, Behm DG. Aerobic activity before and following short-duration static stretching improves range of motion and performance vs. a traditional warm-up. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010;35:679-90
  6. Avela J, Finni T, Liikavainio T, Niemelä E, Komi PV. Neural and mechanical responses of the triceps surae muscle group after 1 h of repeated fast passive stretches. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004;96:2325-32
  7. Donti O, Tsolakis C, Bogdanis GC. Effects of baseline levels of flexibility and vertical jump ability on performance following different volumes of static stretching and potentiating exercises in elite gymnasts. J Sports Sci Med 2014;13:105-13
  8. Ogura Y, Miyahara Y, Naito H, Katamoto S, Aoki J. Duration of static stretching influences muscle force production in hamstring muscles. J Strength Cond Res 2007;21:788-92
  9. Chatzopoulos D, Galazoulas C, Patikas D, Kotzamanidis C. Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on balance, agility, reaction time and movement time. J Sports Sci Med 2014;13:403-9
  10. Holt LE, Pelham TW, Burke DG. Modifications to the Standard Sit-and-Reach Flexibility Protocol. J Athl Train 1999;34:43-7
  11. Göral K. Examination of agility performance of soccer players according to their playing position. The Sport Journal 2015;51. Available from: http://thesportjournal. org/article/examination-of-agility-performances-of-soccerplayers-according-to-their-playing-positions/ 12. Váczi M, Tollár J, Meszler B, Juhász I, Karsai I. Shortterm high intensity plyometric training program improves strength, power and agility in male soccer players. J Hum Kinet 2013;36:17-26
  12. Keir DA, Thériault F, Serresse O. Evaluation of the runningbased anaerobic sprint test as a measure of repeated sprint ability in collegiate-level soccer players. J St