Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 4

Effectiveness of the kinesiotaping in the patellofemoral pain syndrome

Pages
299–306
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A statistically significant improvement was observed in all groups in terms of the mean VAS and KPS scores before the treatment, at week 6, and at week 12 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of kinesiotaping implementation on pain and functional status in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).Patients and methods: Between January 2014 and July 2014, this prospective, single-center, randomized-controlled study included a total of 75 knees from 43 patients (20 males, 23 females; mean age 33.8±7.9 years; range, 20 to 50 years).
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients were divided into three treatment groups: Group 1 (25 knees) were treated with kinesiotaping and exercise, Group 2 (25 knees) were treated with sham taping + and exercise, and Group 3 (25 knees) were treated with exercise alone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A statistically significant improvement was observed in all groups in terms of the mean VAS and KPS scores before the treatment, at week 6, and at week 12 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of kinesiotaping implementation on pain and functional status in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).Patients and methods: Between January 2014 and July 2014, this prospective, single-center, randomized-controlled study included a total of 75 knees from 43 patients (20 males, 23 females; mean age 33.8±7.9 years; range, 20 to 50 years). All patients were divided into three treatment groups: Group 1 (25 knees) were treated with kinesiotaping and exercise, Group 2 (25 knees) were treated with sham taping + and exercise, and Group 3 (25 knees) were treated with exercise alone. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain severity. The Kujala Patellofemoral Scale (KPS) was used to determine the effect of the knee pain on the patients' daily living activities. All three groups were given the same exercise program during six weeks. Kinesiotaping was applied twice a week, 12 times in total during the treatment period of six weeks. The VAS and KPS assessments for all patients were made at baseline, then at the end of the treatment (week 6) and at week 12 the end of the 12th week.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups in terms of age, sex, height, weight, and Body Mass Index (p>0.05, for all). A statistically significant improvement was observed in all groups in terms of the mean VAS and KPS scores before the treatment, at week 6, and at week 12 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKUYSAL, Ç., ÖZDOLAP, Ş., SARIKAYA, S., GÜNAY, E. (2022). Effectiveness of the kinesiotaping in the patellofemoral pain syndrome. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 4, 299–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/628630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Insall J. Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. In: Insall J, editor. Surgery of the knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1993. p. 241-385
  2. Fulkerson JA, Buuck AA. Patellofemoral joint anatomy. In: Fulkerson JA, editor. Disorders of the patellofemoral joint. Baskı yeri: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 1-24
  3. Callaghan MJ, Selfe J. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;4:CD006717
  4. LaBella C. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: evaluation and treatment. Prim Care 2004;31:977-1003
  5. Donell ST, Joseph G, Hing CB, Marshall TJ. Modified Dejour trochleoplasty for severe dysplasia: operative technique and early clinical results. Knee 2006;13:266-73
  6. Gerbino PG, Griffin ED, d'Hemecourt PA. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: evaluation of location and intensity of pain. Clin J Pain 2006;22:154-9
  7. Earl JE, Vetter CS. Patellofemoral pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2007;18:439-58
  8. Bolgla LA, Boling MC. An update for the conservative management of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2010. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2011;6:112-25. 9. van der Heijden RA, Lankhorst NE, van Linschoten R, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;1:CD010387
  9. Celiker R, Guven Z, Aydoğ T, Bagis S, Atalay A, Caglar Yagci, et al. The kinesiologic taping technique and its applications. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2011;57:225-35
  10. Chen CY, Lou MY. Effects of the application of Kinesio-tape and traditional tape on motor perception. Br J Sports Med 2008;42:513-40
  11. Firth BL, Dingley P, Davies ER, Lewis JS, Alexander CM. The effect of kinesiotape on function, pain, and motoneuronal excitability in healthy people and people with Achilles tendinopathy. Clin J Sport Med 2010;20:416-21
  12. Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesio(TM) taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med 2004;3:1-7
  13. Karadag-Saygi E, Cubukcu-Aydoseli K, Kablan N, Ofluoglu D. The role of kinesiotaping combined with botulinum toxin to reduce plantar flexors spasticity after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17:318-22
  14. Kase KR, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical therapeutic application of the kinesiotaping method. Tokyo: Ken Ikai Co Ltd; 2003
  15. Christou EA. Patellar taping increases vastus medialis oblique activity in the presence of patellofemoral pain. J Elec