Journals / Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Contribution to the knowledge of Scoliidae (Hymenoptera) fauna of Turkey

Pages
247–252
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Amongst those Megascolia maculata maculata (Drury, 1773) is the most common subspecies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it has been determined that totally 10 species belonging to Scoliidae occuring in the collection of LEMT (Lodos Entomological Museum, Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it has been determined that totally 10 species belonging to Scoliidae occuring in the collection of LEMT (Lodos Entomological Museum, Turkey).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Amongst those Megascolia maculata maculata (Drury, 1773) is the most common subspecies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it has been determined that totally 10 species belonging to Scoliidae occuring in the collection of LEMT (Lodos Entomological Museum, Turkey). Amongst those Megascolia maculata maculata (Drury, 1773) is the most common subspecies.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin farklı yerlerinden 1962-2004 yılları arasında toplanan ve LEMT (Lodos Entomoloji Müzesi) koleksiyonunda korunan Scoliidae (Hymenoptera) familyasından 10 tür ve alttür incelenmiş olup, bunlar arasında Megascolia maculata maculata (Drury, 1773) alttürünün en yaygın olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ANLAŞ, S., KARSAVURAN, Y., TEZCAN, S., PEHLİVAN, E. (2022). Contribution to the knowledge of Scoliidae (Hymenoptera) fauna of Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 247–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/628398

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Betrem, J. G., 1935. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Palâarktischen Arten des Genus Scolia. Tijdschr. Entom., 78: 1-78.
  2. Betrem, J. G., 1936. Scolia quadrlcincta F., 1775=Scolia sexmaculata (O. F. Müller, 1766) nee F., 1781. Tijdschr. Entom., 79: 77-79.
  3. Betrem, J. G., 1961. Bemerkungen über die Palâarktischen Scoliiden. Verh. XI. Int. Kongr. Ent. Wien, 1960 (1): 247-250.
  4. Bradley, J. C, 1950. The most primitive Scoliidae. Revista Espanola de Entomologia,427-438.
  5. Hamon, J., 1992. Une espece meconnue de Scoliiidae europeenne: Colpa klugii (Vander Linden, 1827) (Hymenoptera). L'Entomologiste, 48 (6): 313-316.
  6. Hamon, J., 1993. Observations sur Scolia (Scolia) galbula (Pallas, 1771), Scolia (Scolia) fallax Eversmann, 1849 et Scolia (Discolla) hirta (Schrank, 1781). Nouv. Rev. Ent. (N.S.), 10 (1): 87-96,
  7. Hamon, J., 1994. Note sur les Elis de la faune de France, au sens de Berland (1925) (Hymenoptera, Scoliidae). Nouv. Revue Ent., 1: 85-90.
  8. Hamon, J. & T. Osten, 1994. Le nom de la grande scolie europeenne a tete jaune est-il Scolia (Triscolla) flavifrons Fabricius, 1787, ou bien Megascolia(Regiscolia) maculata (Drury, 1773) (Hymenoptera, Scoliidae). Bull. Soc. linn. Bordeaux, 22 (1): 13-17.
  9. Madl, M., 1997.
  10. Über Vespiden, Pompiliden, Scoliiden und Tiphiiden der Türkei (Hymenoptera). Linzer biol. Beitr., 29 (2): 823-827.
  11. Osten, T. & H. Özbek, 1999. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Scoliiden-Fauna der Türkei (ohne Zypern) mit Anmerkungen zur Systematik und Taxonomie (Hymenoptera, Scoliidae). Entomofauna, 20 (28): 429-444.
  12. Osten, T., 2000. Die Scoliiden des Mittelmeer-Gebietes und angrenzender Regionen (Hymenoptera) Ein Bestimmungsschlüssel. Linzer biol. Beitr., 32 (2): 537-593.
  13. Osten, T., 2004. Zur Taxonomie von Scolia boeberi Klug, 1805, Scolia kasakhstanica (Steinberg, 1962) und Scolia anatoliae spec. nov. Entomol. Z., 114 (5): 204-208.
  14. Tkalcu, B., 1987. Ergebnisse der Tschechoslowakisch-Iranischen Entomologischen Expedition nach dem Iran 1970, 1973 und 1977 (Mit Angaben über einige Sammelresultate in Anatolien) Hymenoptera: Scolioidea, Scoliidae. Acta Ent. Mus. Nat. Pragae, 42: 287-291.