2 of the Law 4857 substances with principal employer and the subcontractorrelationship within the scope of the workers labor rights of both employers togetherto be responsible for these responsibilities, the nature with the principal employerand the subconractor of this responsibility welded inside the interactions allocationis required.For determing the responsibility the kind of encumbrance, joint liability withthe provisions of the Code of Obligations regulates, judicial decisions, agreementbetween the parties shows us the way.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:2 of the Law 4857 substances with principal employer and the subcontractorrelationship within the scope of the workers labor rights of both employers togetherto be responsible for these responsibilities, the nature with the principal employerand the subconractor of this responsibility welded inside the interactions allocationis required.For determing the responsibility the kind of encumbrance, joint liability withthe provisions of the Code of Obligations regulates, judicial decisions, agreementbetween the parties shows us the way.
📊
Key Findings & Data:2 of the Law 4857 substances with principal employer and the subcontractorrelationship within the scope of the workers labor rights of both employers togetherto be responsible for these responsibilities, the nature with the principal employerand the subconractor of this responsibility welded inside the interactions allocationis required.For determing the responsibility the kind of encumbrance, joint liability withthe provisions of the Code of Obligations regulates, judicial decisions, agreementbetween the parties shows us the way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:2 of the Law 4857 substances with principal employer and the subcontractorrelationship within the scope of the workers labor rights of both employers togetherto be responsible for these responsibilities, the nature with the principal employerand the subconractor of this responsibility welded inside the interactions allocationis required.For determing the responsibility the kind of encumbrance, joint liability withthe provisions of the Code of Obligations regulates, judicial decisions, agreementbetween the parties shows us the way.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
2 of the Law 4857 substances with principal employer and the subcontractorrelationship within the scope of the workers labor rights of both employers togetherto be responsible for these responsibilities, the nature with the principal employerand the subconractor of this responsibility welded inside the interactions allocationis required.For determing the responsibility the kind of encumbrance, joint liability withthe provisions of the Code of Obligations regulates, judicial decisions, agreementbetween the parties shows us the way.
Özet
4857 sayılı İş Kanununun 2. maddesi ile asıl işveren- alt işveren ilişkisi kapsamındaçalışan işçilerin işçilik haklarından her iki işverenin birlikte sorumlu tutulması, busorumluluğun mahiyetiyle birlikte asıl işveren ile alt işveren arasındaki birliktesorumluluktan kaynaklı iç ilişkinin irdelenmesini de gerekli kılmaktadır. Söz konusu iç ilişkinin belirlenmesinde birlikte sorumlu olunan işçilik alacağınınnevi, müteselsil sorumluluğu düzenleyen Borçlar Kanunu hükümleri ile yargı içtihatlarıve taraflar arasındaki sözleşmeler bize yol gösterici olmaktadır.
🔖
Cite This Article
BOYDAK, A. B. (2022). Retracment Relationship Between Principal Employer-Subconractor Based Joint Liability (Internal Relationship). Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24, 227–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/626296
Aydınlı İ., Görünürdeki İşlem Açısından Türk İş Hukukunda Alt İşveren İlişkisi ve Muvazaa Sorunu, Birinci Baskı, Ankara, 2008
Canbolat T., Türk Hukukunda Alt İşveren Asıl İşveren İlişkisi, 1992
Canbolat T., Türk Hukukunda Alt İşveren (Borçlar Hukuku Bakımından) Kamu İşyerlerinde Alt İşveren Uygulamasının Doğurduğu Sorunlar ve Çözüm Arayışları (Tebliğ), Kamu-iş Belek-Antalya,2010
Çankaya G., Çil Ş., İş Hukukunda Üçlü İlişkiler, Ankara,2011 Çelik N./Caniklioğlu N./Canbolat T., İş Hukuku Dersleri,İstanbul,2014 Eren F., 6098 Sayılı Türk Borçlar Kanuna Göre Hazırlanmış Borçlar Hukuku Ge-nel Hükümler, Ankara, 2013 Hatemi/Gökyayla, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Bölüm, İstanbul,2012
Kılıçoğlu A., Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Ankara, 2012
Mollamahmutoğlu H., İş Hukuku, Ankara, 2008
Narmanlıoğlu Ü., Asıl İşveren-Alt İşveren İlişkisinden Doğan Sorumuluklar Le-gal Vefa Toplantıları II, Prof. Dr. Nuri Çelik’e Saygı, (Türk İş Hukukunda Üçlü İlişkiler), İstanbul, 2008 Tekinay S. –Akman S. –Burcuoğlu H.-Altop A., Borçlar Hukuku (Genel Hüküm-ler), Beşinci Bası, Fakülteler Matbaası,İstanbul.
Özkara E., İşyerinin Devrinin İş Sözleşmesine Etkisi ve İşverenlerin Hukuki So-rumululuğu, İstanbul, 2008
Özkaraca E., İşyeri Devri Devirden Önce Doğan Borçlardan Sorumluluk (Karar İncelemesi), Çalışma ve Toplum, 2009/1, S. 20 Süzek S., İş Hukuku, İstanbul, 2014 www. hukuki.net www.kazanci.com www.calismatoplum.org/sayi33/abc/8-33.pdf