Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Does aging affect immediate and delayed implicit memory performance?

Anlık ve gecikmeli örtük bellek performansı yaşlanmadan etkilenir mi?

Pages
26–35
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The ANOVA results show that main effects of the age, instruction type, testing time and concreteness level of the words on the WSC task scores are found significant.Conclusion: The results shown that younger adults beter than older adults, implicit memory better than explicit memory, immediate test beter than delay testing time and studied words beter than non-studied words on WSC performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of the instruction type (implicit vs explicit), testing time (immediate vs delay) and concreteness level of the words (concrete vs abstract) on word-stem completion scores.Materials and Method: The data has been collected from 95 volunteers; 49 young and 46 elderly adults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the same the word-stem completion task is used in order to measure the implicit and explicit memory performance, different instructions are used to deduce the different memory kinds.Results: In the light of ANOVA results, the main and interaction effects of the age, instruction type, testing time and concreteness level in the WSC scores are investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The ANOVA results show that main effects of the age, instruction type, testing time and concreteness level of the words on the WSC task scores are found significant.Conclusion: The results shown that younger adults beter than older adults, implicit memory better than explicit memory, immediate test beter than delay testing time and studied words beter than non-studied words on WSC performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of the instruction type (implicit vs explicit), testing time (immediate vs delay) and concreteness level of the words (concrete vs abstract) on word-stem completion scores.Materials and Method: The data has been collected from 95 volunteers; 49 young and 46 elderly adults. While the same the word-stem completion task is used in order to measure the implicit and explicit memory performance, different instructions are used to deduce the different memory kinds.Results: In the light of ANOVA results, the main and interaction effects of the age, instruction type, testing time and concreteness level in the WSC scores are investigated. The ANOVA results show that main effects of the age, instruction type, testing time and concreteness level of the words on the WSC task scores are found significant.Conclusion: The results shown that younger adults beter than older adults, implicit memory better than explicit memory, immediate test beter than delay testing time and studied words beter than non-studied words on WSC performance. Finally, immediate and delay implicit memory effected by aging.

Özet

Giriş: Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, genç ve yaşlı yetişkinlerde yönerge türü (örtük, açık), test edilme için geçen süre (anlık ve gecikmeli) ve kelimelerin somutluk düzeyinin (somut, soyut) kelime kökü tamamlama (KKT) puanı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada, 49 genç, 46 yaşlı olmak üzere toplam 95 gönüllü katılımcı yer almıştır. Çalışmada örtük ve açık bellek ölçümü için aynı KKT görevi kullanılırken; örtük ve açık bellek, farklı yönergeler kullanılarak ortaya çıkarılmıştır.Bulgular: Varyans analizleri ile yaş, yönerge türü, test edilme süresi ve somutluk düzeyi değişkenlerinin KKT puanı üzerindeki temel ve ortak etkileri incelenmiştir. ANOVA sonucunda yaş, yönerge türü, test için geçen süre ve kelimelerin somutluk düzeyi değişkenlerinin KKT puanları üzerindeki temel etkileri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Bulgular, gençlerin yaşlılardan, örtük yönergenin açık yönergeden, anlık test edilmenin gecikmeli test edilmeden ve önceden çalışılan kelimelerin (somut/soyut) önceden çalışılmayanlardan (somut/soyut) daha başarılı hatırlama performansına neden olduğunu göstermiştir. Anlık ve gecikmeli örtük bellek performansı yaştan etkilenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYNAK, H., CANGÖZ, B. (2022). Does aging affect immediate and delayed implicit memory performance?. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 26–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/624152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Graf P, Schacter DL. Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. J Exp Psychol: Lea Mem Cog 1985;11:501–18
  2. Schacter DL. Implicit memory: History and current status. J ExpPsychol: Lea Mem Cog 1987;13(3):501-518
  3. Light LL, Prull MW, La Voie DJ, Healy MR. Dual-process theories of memory in old age. In: T. J. Perfect TJ & Maylor EA (Eds.): Models of cognitive aging: Debates in Psychology. Oxford University Press,London 2000, pp 102-119
  4. Willingham DB, Preuss L. The death of implicit memory. Psyche [Internet]. 1995 Oct; 2(15). Available from:
  5. Posner MI, Petersen SE, Fox PI, Raichle ME. Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science 1988;240: 1627-1631
  6. Schacter DL. Understanding implicit memory. Am Psychologist 1992;47(4):559 569
  7. Anooshian LJ. Understanding age differences in memory: Disentangling conscious and unconscious processes. Int J Behav Develop 1999;23(1):1–18
  8. Cangöz B. ileri yaşlılar ile genç yetişkinlerde kodlama düzeyinin örtük ve açık bellek üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Geriatri Dergisi 2002;5(4):125-131
  9. Fleischman DA, Wilson RS, Gabrieli JDE, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA. Implicit memory and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropathology. Brain 2005;128:2006-2015
  10. Kim MS, Kim YY, Kim FN, Lee KJ, Ha TH, Kwon JS. Implicit and explicit memory in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: An event-related potential study. J Psychiatric Res 2005;40(6):541-549
  11. Pauli P, Dengler W, Wiedemann. Implicit and explicit memory processes in panic patients as reflected in behavioral and electrophysiological measures. J Behav Therapy Exp Psychiatry 2004;36(2):111-127
  12. Goshen-Gottstein Y, Kempinsky H. Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: A comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2000;8(1):139-146
  13. Hamilton M, Rajaram S. The concreteness effect in implicit and explicit memory tests. J Mem Language 2001;44:96–117
  14. Pilotti M, Meade ML, Gallo DA. Implicit and explicit measures of memory for perceptual information in young adults, healthy older adults, and patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Exp Aging Research 2003,29;15-32
  15. Tavat B, Karakaş, S. Örtük ve açık yönerge, kodlama ve sunum türünün yeni çağrışımlar kurmaya etkisi. In: Bayraktar R, Dağ ı (Eds.): VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları Kitabı
  16. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongre