Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Turkısh relıabılıty and valıdıty study of the process of retırement plannıng scale: the example of Karabuk Unıversıty

Emekliliği planlama süreci ölçeğinin türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması: Karabük Üniversitesi örneği

Pages
84–94
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated high convergent and criterion related validities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The study was performed to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of The Process of Retirement Planning Scale-PRePS (Noone, Stphens and Alpass, 2010) developed to measure employees' planning behaviors of preparation for the retirement years.Materials and Method: The study was conducted over a total of 216 participants who are working as academic and administrative staff at Karabuk University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides The Process of Retirement Planning Scale-PRePS, to test the validity of the Turkish version of the scale, Future Time Perspective Scale and SF-36 quality of life scale were also administered to the participants.Results: The structural validity of the scale was investigated by factor analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated high convergent and criterion related validities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The study was performed to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of The Process of Retirement Planning Scale-PRePS (Noone, Stphens and Alpass, 2010) developed to measure employees' planning behaviors of preparation for the retirement years.Materials and Method: The study was conducted over a total of 216 participants who are working as academic and administrative staff at Karabuk University. The scale was made up of four subscales, namely the process of financial planning, lifestyle planning, psychosocial planning and health planning which attempt to measure the process of retirement planning behaviors of the employees. Besides The Process of Retirement Planning Scale-PRePS, to test the validity of the Turkish version of the scale, Future Time Perspective Scale and SF-36 quality of life scale were also administered to the participants.Results: The structural validity of the scale was investigated by factor analysis. The results of the factor analysis were composed of four subscales in accordance with the original form of the scale. The results indicated high convergent and criterion related validities. Reliability analyses showed that the Process of Retirement Planning Scale-PRePS had a high internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha 0.88) and high test-retest (0.86) and split half (0.87) reliability coefficients.Conclusion: The results of the factor analysis were compatible with the results of Noone, Stphens and Alpass's (2010). Based on these findings, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the PRePS had sufficiently high reliability and validity to justify its use as a tool to measure employees' retirement planning behaviors in Turkey.

Özet

Giriş: Bu araştırma, çalışan bireylerin emeklilik yıllarına hazırlık olması açısından plan yapma davranışlarını ölçmek üzere geliştirilmiş olan Emekliliği Planlama Süreci Ölçeği'nin (The Process of Retirement Planning Scale-PRePS) (Noone, Stphens and Alpass, 2010) Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğ ini test etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma Karabük Üniversitesinde akademik ve idari personel olarak görev yapan toplam 216 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçek finansal planlama süreci, yaşam tarzı planlama süreci, psiko-sosyal planlama süreci ve sağlık planlama süreci olmak üzere 4 alanda çalışanların emeklilik planlama süreçlerini ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Geçerlilik konusunda bilgi sahibi olmak için katılımcılardan Emekliliği Planlama Süreci Ölçeğinin yanı sıra Gelecek Zaman Algısı Ölçeği ile SF-36 Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği'ni (Kısa Formu) de doldurmaları istenmiştir.Bulgular: Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği faktör analizi yoluyla incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, ölçeğin özgün formuna uygun olarak dört alt ölçekten oluştuğu görülmüştür. Emekliliği Planlama Süreci Ölçeğinin Cronbach Alpha katsayısı 0.88, test-tekrar test güvenilirlik katsayısı 0.86 ve hesaplanan iki yarım güvenilirlik katsayısının 0.87 olduğu belirlenmiştir.Sonuç: Yapılan faktör analizi sonuçları Noone, Stphens and Alpass'ın (2010) bulguları ile paralellik göstermektedir. Bu bulgulara dayanarak, Emekliliği Planlama Süreci Ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun ülkemizde yürütülecek olan araştırmalarda kullanılabilmesi için yeterli güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik değerlerine sahip olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, G. (2022). Turkısh relıabılıty and valıdıty study of the process of retırement plannıng scale: the example of Karabuk Unıversıty. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 84–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/623925

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Howard HJ, Marshall J, Rechnitzer PA, Cunningham DA, Danner A. Adapting to retirement. Journal of American Geri- atrics Society 1982;30:488–500. (PMID:7047622). n Mulley GP. Preparing for the later years. Lancet 1995;345(8962):1409-14. (PMID:7760613) Dorfman L. Health conditions and perceived quality of life in retirement. Health and Social Work 1995;20(3):192-9. Aiken LR. Aging: An Introduction of Gerontology (1st Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1995, pp 267, 272-80. (ISBN: 0- 8039-5445-X). Hillier SM, Barrow GM. Aging, the individual, and society (9th Ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning: Belmont, CA, 2010, pp 202-30. (ISBN-13: 978-0-495-81166-4).
  2. Rosenkoetter MM, Garris JM. Retirement planning, use of ti- me, and psychosocial adjustment. Issues in Mental Health Nur- sing 2001;22:703-22. (PMID:11881183). Atchley RC. Issues in retirement research. The Gerontologist 1979;19(1):44-54. (PMID:263576). Rosenkoetter MM, Garris JM. Psychological Changes Fallo- wing Retirement. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1998;27(5):966-77. (PMID:9637323). Lo R, Brown R. Stress and adaptation: Preparation for success- ful retirement. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing 1999;8:30-8. (PMID:10382397). Barnes H, Parry J. Renegotiating identity and relationships: Men and women’s adjustment to retirement. Ageing and Soci- ety 2004;24:213-33.
  3. Reitzes DC, Mutran ET. The transition to retirement: stages and factors that influence retirement adjustment. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 2004;59(1):63-84. (PMID:15453412). Nusbaum NJ. Preparation for healthy retirement. Journal of American Geriatric Society 2003;51(3):429-34. (PMID:12588593). Noone JH, Stephens C, Alpass F. Preretirement planning and well-being in later life a prospective study. Research on Aging 2009;31(3):295-317.
  4. Kim JE, Moen P. Retirement transition, gender, and psycholo- gical well-being: a life course ecological model. Journal of Ge- rontology: Psychological Sciences 2002;57B(3):212–22. (PMID:11983732). Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. Baby boomer retirement security: The roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. Jour- nal of Monetary Economics 2007;54:205-24.
  5. Hershey DA, Mowen JC. Psychological determinants of finan- cial preparedness for retirement. The Gerontologist 2000;40(6):687-97. (PMID:11131085). Günay, G, Bener, Ö. Status of individuals’ planning to prepare for retirement in Turkey. Educational Gerontology 2008;34(2):148-61.
  6. Noone JH, Stephens C, Alpass F. The Proc