SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

THE USE OF QUICK SOFA (QSOFA) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİNDE SEPSİS TANILI YAŞLI HASTALARDA HIZLI SOFA (QSOFA) KULLANIMI

Kutlu Hakan ERKAL
Yücel YÜCE
Banu ÇEVİK
Fatih Doğu GEYİK
Necati ÇITAK
Pages
143–149
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statisticallysignificant difference (p 7 and

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In elderly patients with clinically diagnosed sepsis, we investigated theperformance of quick sepsis-associated organ failure assessment in admission to the mortalityand intensive care unit and compared its performance with acute physiology and chronichealth assessment, assessing systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis-related organfailure.Materials and Method: From February 2016 to February 2017, we retrospectively reviewed92 elderly patients (≥65 years of age) who were clinically diagnosed with sepsis in the intensivecare unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We compared the performance of organ failure assessment associated with sepsis,acute physiology and chronic health assessment II, systemic inflammatory response syndrome,and quick sepsis related with organ failure assessment, foreseeing a 28-day mortality in theintensive care unit.Results: The scores of organ failure assessment associated with quick sepsis were 1 in6.5% (n=6), 2 in 30.4% (n=28) and 3 in 63% (n=58) Mean sepsis-related organ failure ratingscore was 9.2±3.0, mean systemic inflammatory response syndrome score was 2.6±0.6, andacute physiology and chronic health assessment score II was 25.4±7.2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statisticallysignificant difference (p 7 and
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In elderly patients with clinically diagnosed sepsis, we investigated theperformance of quick sepsis-associated organ failure assessment in admission to the mortalityand intensive care unit and compared its performance with acute physiology and chronichealth assessment, assessing systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis-related organfailure.Materials and Method: From February 2016 to February 2017, we retrospectively reviewed92 elderly patients (≥65 years of age) who were clinically diagnosed with sepsis in the intensivecare unit. We compared the performance of organ failure assessment associated with sepsis,acute physiology and chronic health assessment II, systemic inflammatory response syndrome,and quick sepsis related with organ failure assessment, foreseeing a 28-day mortality in theintensive care unit.Results: The scores of organ failure assessment associated with quick sepsis were 1 in6.5% (n=6), 2 in 30.4% (n=28) and 3 in 63% (n=58) Mean sepsis-related organ failure ratingscore was 9.2±3.0, mean systemic inflammatory response syndrome score was 2.6±0.6, andacute physiology and chronic health assessment score II was 25.4±7.2. There was a statisticallysignificant difference (p 7 and

Özet

Giriş: Klinik olarak tanısı konmuş sepsis olan yaşlı hastalarda mortalite ve yoğun bakım ünitesine kabul etmede hızlı sepsis ile ilişkili organ yetmezliği değerlendirmesinin performansını araştırdık ve performansını sistemik inflamatuar yanıt sendromu, sepsis ile ilişkili organ yetmezliği değerlendirmesi ve akut fizyoloji ve kronik sağlık değerlendirmesi ile karşılaştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Şubat 2016’dan Şubat 2017’ye kadar, yoğun bakım ünitesinde klinik olarak sepsis tanısı alan 92 yaşlı (≥65 yaş) hastayı retrospektif olarak inceledik. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde 28 günlük mortaliteyi öngörmede sepsis ile ilişkili organ yetmezliği değerlendirmesi, akut fizyoloji ve kronik sağlık değerlendirmesi II, sistemik inflamatuar yanıt sendromu ve hızlı sepsis ile ilişkili organ yetmezliği değerlendirmesinin performansını karşılaştırdık. Bulgular: Hızlı sepsis ile ilişkili organ yetmezliği değerlendirmesi skorları %6.5 (n=6) hastada 1, %30.4 (n=28) hastada 2 ve %63 (n=58) hastada 3 idi. Ortalama sepsis ile ilişkili organ yetmezliği değerlendirmesi skoru 9.2±3.0, ortalama sistemik inflamatuar yanıt sendromu skoru 2.6±0.6 ve akut fizyoloji ve kronik sağlık değerlendirmesi II skoru 25.4±7.2 idi. Ölüm oranları >7 and

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAL, K. H., YÜCE, Y., ÇEVİK, B., GEYİK, F. D., ÇITAK, N. (2022). THE USE OF QUICK SOFA (QSOFA) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 143–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/623687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Albayrak T, Kahveci R, Ozkara A, Kasım I. The future of elderly care in Turkey. Br J Gen Pract 2014
  2. 64(618):14- 5. (PMID:2456755). Behrendt CE. Acute respiratory failure in the United States
  3. incidence and 31-day survival. Chest 2000
  4. 118(4):1100-5. (PMID:11035684). Yu W, ASh AS, Levinsky NG, Moskowitz MA. Intensive care unit and mortality in the elderly. J Gen Intern Med 2000
  5. 15(2):97-102. (PMID 10672112). Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016
  6. 315(8):801- 10. (PMID:26903338). Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016
  7. 315(8):762-74. (PMID:26903335). Levy MM, Artigas A, Phillips GS, et al. Outcomes of the surviving sepsis campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2012
  8. 12(12):919-24. (PMID:23103175). Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley, et al. Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000–2007) Chest 2011
  9. 1223– 31. (PMID: 21852297). Nuckton TJ, List ND. Age as a factor in critical care unit admissions. Arch Intern Med 1995
  10. 155(10):1087- 92. (PMID:7748053). Juneja D, Singh O, Nasa P, Dang R. Comparison of newer scoring systems with the conventional scoring systems in general intensive care population. Minerva Anestesiol 2012
  11. 78(2):194-200. (PMID:22095102). Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985
  12. 13(10):818-29. (PMID:3928249). Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/ North American multicenter study. J Am Med Assoc 1993
  13. 270(24):2957-62. (PMID:8254858). Fuchs L, Chronaki CE, Park S, et al. ICU admission characteristics and mortality rates among elderly and very elderly patients. Intensive Care Med 2012
  14. 38(10):1654-61. (PMID:22797350). Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al
  15. Sepsis Definitions Task Force. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016
  16. 315(8):775-87. (PMID:26903336). Wang JY, Chen YX, Guo SB, Mei X, Yang P. Predictive performance of quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment for mortality and ICU admission in patients with