Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 4

The combined administration of systemic and topical tranexamic acid for total hip arthroplasty: Is it better than systemic?

Pages
297–300
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But the statistical analysis and clinical relevance is not significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Obective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined intravenous and topical use of tranexamic acid (TXA) on total blood loss and transfusion rate in total hip arthroplasty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This prospective randomized study included 57 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty between September 2016 and September 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But the statistical analysis and clinical relevance is not significant.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Obective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined intravenous and topical use of tranexamic acid (TXA) on total blood loss and transfusion rate in total hip arthroplasty. Methods: This prospective randomized study included 57 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty between September 2016 and September 2017. The IV administration group (Group 1) consisted of 26 patients (mean age: 63.73 ± 10.29 years), while the IV and topical administiration group (Group 2) consisted of 22 patients (62.82 ± 8.31 years). Demographic data and outcomes were obtained through a review of individual medical records. Medical comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), ASA and CCI, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, postoperative transfusion records and 90-day joint-related (implant subsidence, dislocation, postoperative anemia, deep infection, hematoma and/or wound problem, postoperative periprosthetic fracture) readmission rate and complication rate were compared between the groups. Results: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), the level of preoperative Hb values, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Charleson Comorbidty Index (CCI) rating (p > 0.05). The mean postoperative Hgb in the group 2 was higher by a small amount compared to the group 1. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the Hgb values (p¼0.562). Hgb Delta in the group 2 was lower than that of the group 1. The difference between the groups in the Hgb Delta values was not statistically significant (p ¼ 0.268). The mean total blood loss was lower in the group 2 than in the group 1 but the difference was not statistically significant (p ¼ 0.788). There was no significant difference observed in terms of any adverse complications among the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The combined administration of IV and topical TXA compared with IV alone can decrease total blood loss and the number of blood transfusions required without increasing the risk of DVTor/and PE in total hip arthroplasty. But the statistical analysis and clinical relevance is not significant.

🔖

Cite This Article

GULABİ, D., YÜCE, Y., ERKAL, K. H., SAĞLAM, N., ÇAMUR, S. (2019). The combined administration of systemic and topical tranexamic acid for total hip arthroplasty: Is it better than systemic?. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 4, 297–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/353498

References (6)

  1. Oremus K. Tranexamic acid for the reduction of blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(Suppl 1):S40eS44. https://doi.org/ 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.35. Wu YG, Zeng Y, Yang T, Si H, Cao F, Shen B. The efficacy and safety of combination of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid in revision hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2438e2453. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.059. Lemos MJ, Healy WL. Blood transfusion in orthopaedic operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(8):1260e1270. Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion-related mortality: the ongoing risks ofallogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for theirprevention. Blood. 2009;113(15):3406e3417. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-10167643.
  2. Hawi N, Kendoff DO, Hessling U, et al. Effectiveness of an autologous transfusion system following cemented and non-cemented revisions of total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1603e1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264014-2359-1.
  3. Niemi TT, Pitkanen M, Syrjala M, et al. Comparison of hypotensive epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia on blood loss and coagulation during and after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44(4):457e464. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440418.x.
  4. Paul JE, Ling E, Lalonde C, et al. Deliberate hypotension in orthopedic surgery reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(10):799e810. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF03021707. Atik OS. Does tranexamic acid reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirementinkneearthroplasty?EklemHastalikCerrahisi.2012;23(3):166e167. Yamasaki S, Masuhara K, Fuji T. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss after cementlesstotal hiparthroplasty-prospective randomizedstudy in40 cases. Int Orthop. 2004;28:69e73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0511-4.
  5. Wei W, Wei B. Comparison of topical and intravenous tranexamic acid on blood loss and transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:2113e2116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.019.
  6. Wind TC, Barfield WR, Moskal JT. The effect of tranexamic acid on transfusion rate in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:387e389. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.026. Alshryda S, Sukeik M, Sarda P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the topical administration of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(