Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX AND ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NON-ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Pages
370–380
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The prognostic nutritional index score was associated with all-cause mortality in elderly patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Patients over 65 years of age with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction are at higher risk of mortality and morbidity than younger patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A prognostic nutritional index of 46 was determined as the optimal cutoff value to predict the primary endpoint, which was all-cause death during the follow-up period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The prognostic nutritional index score was associated with all-cause mortality in elderly patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Patients over 65 years of age with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction are at higher risk of mortality and morbidity than younger patients. The prognostic nutritional index is a combined immunologicalnutritional status score based on serum albumin levels and lymphocyte values. We evaluated the association between prognostic nutritional index value and all-cause mortality in elderly patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The current study presents the first evaluation of prognostic nutritional index in elderly patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. The study population was divided into two groups according to their admission prognostic nutritional index. A prognostic nutritional index of 46 was determined as the optimal cutoff value to predict the primary endpoint, which was all-cause death during the follow-up period. Results: Compared to patients with a prognostic nutritional index ≥ 46, those with a prognostic nutritional index < 46 were older (p < 0.001) and more often had a history of hypertension and known coronary artery disease (p = 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the group with lower prognostic nutritional index (12.5% vs 4.8%; p = 0.007). The prognostic nutritional index predicted the primary endpoint, and this prediction was statistically significant (sensitivity 71%; specificity 67%). Univariate Cox regression analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that a cut-off level of prognostic nutritional index < 46 was significantly associated with the primary endpoint. Conclusions: The prognostic nutritional index score was associated with all-cause mortality in elderly patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

MADEN, O., ÖZİLHAN, M. O., ÇÖTELİ, C., KARAASLAN, Ö. Ç., KÖNTE, H. C. (2022). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX AND ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NON-ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 370–380. https://ajindex.com/articles/623562

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Webster D, Celik O. Systematic review of Kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:108. (PMID: 24996956)
  2. Alexander KP, Roe MT, Chen AY et al. Evolution in cardiovascular care for elderly patients with non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1479-87. (PMID: 16226171)
  3. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Pre- senting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267-315. (PMID: 26320110)
  4. Charlton KE, Nichols C, Bowden S et al. Older rehabilitation patients are at high risk of malnutrition: evidence from a large Australian database. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(8):622-8. (PMID: 20922337)
  5. Evans C. Malnutrition in the elderly: a multifactorial failure to thrive. Perm J. 2005;9(3):38-41. (PMID: 22811627)
  6. Wyszynski DF, Perman M, Crivelli A. Prevalence of hospital malnutrition in Argentina: preliminary results of a population-based study. Nutrition. 2003;19(2):115-9. (PMID: 12591541)
  7. Keskin M, Hayıroğlu MI, Keskin T et al. A novel and useful predictive indicator of prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the prognostic nutritional index. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27(5):438-46. (PMID: 28392077)
  8. Narumi T, Arimoto T, Funayama A et al. Prognostic importance of objective nutritional indexes in patients with chronic heart failure. J Cardiol. 2013;62(5):307-13. (PMID: 23806549)
  9. Pathirana AK, Lokunarangoda N, Ranathunga I et al. Prevalence of hospital malnutrition among cardiac patients: results from six nutrition screening tools. Springerplus. 2014;3:412. (PMID: 25143874)
  10. Zencirkiran Agus H, Kahraman S. Prognostic nutritional index predicts one-year outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Acta Cardiol. 2020;75(5):450-55. (PMID: 31498720)
  11. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020. (PMID: 32860058)
  12. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echo