Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

OSTEOPOROSIS AND HIP-FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT USING DIFFERENT TOOLS IN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER STROKE

Pages
143–149
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Findings indicated that 70.1% of patients in this study had osteoporosis or osteopenia within the first year following a stroke.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of osteoporosis and 10-year hip-fracture risk in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia using two different assessment algorithms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Seventy-seven patients with post-stroke hemiplegia ≤1 year who were admitted to the stroke unit of a tertiary rehabilitation hospital were included in this cross-sectional study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Findings indicated that 70.1% of patients in this study had osteoporosis or osteopenia within the first year following a stroke.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of osteoporosis and 10-year hip-fracture risk in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia using two different assessment algorithms. Method: Seventy-seven patients with post-stroke hemiplegia ≤1 year who were admitted to the stroke unit of a tertiary rehabilitation hospital were included in this cross-sectional study. All patients underwent bone density assessment. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and QFracture were both used to calculate the 10-year risk probability for hip fracture. Receiver operating characteristic curves were investigated for FRAX and QFracture. Results: Fifteen patients (19.5%) had osteoporosis, and 39 (50.6%) had osteopenia based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. FRAX hip scores were ≥ 3 in 7 patients (9.1%). Ten-year hip-fracture risk was high in 26 patients (33.8%) using QFracture. Six patients (7.8%) had low-energy fractures after stroke. Fracture sites were hip in 2 patients, 1 humerus, 1 forearm, and 2 in lower extremities. The receiver operating characteristic area under curve was 0.804 (% 95 CI 0.665-0.943, p = 0.002) for FRAX and 0.758 (% 95 CI 0.615-0.901, p = 0.009) for QFracture. Cut-off values for the estimation of hip osteoporosis for FRAX and QFracture tools were 1.15 and 1.55, respectively. Conclusion: Findings indicated that 70.1% of patients in this study had osteoporosis or osteopenia within the first year following a stroke. Ten-year hip-fracture risk was 9.1% by FRAX and 33.8% by QFracture. Results of FRAX and QFracture assessment tools demonstrated a significant relationship between ten-year hip-fracture risk and bone mineral density.

🔖

Cite This Article

BUĞDAYCI, D., PAKER, N., KİBAR, H., ÖZDEMİR, Y. S. (2022). OSTEOPOROSIS AND HIP-FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT USING DIFFERENT TOOLS IN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER STROKE. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 143–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/623545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Luan L, Li R, Wang Z, et al. Stroke increases the risk of hip fracture: a systematic review and me- ta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2016;27(11):3149-3154. (PMID: 27185402
  2. Yuan ZC, Mo H, Guan J, et al. Risk of hip fracture following stroke, a meta-analysis of 13 cohort studies. Osteoporos Int 2016;27(9):2673-2679. (PMID: 27101998
  3. Dennis MS, Lo KM, McDowall M, West T. Fractures after stroke: frequency, types, and associations. Stroke. 2002;33(3):728-34. (PMID: 11872896
  4. Lin HL, Lin HC, Tseng YF, et al. Hip fracture after first-ever stroke: a population-based study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;131(3):158-63. (PMID: 25263230
  5. Kapral MK, Fang J, Alibhai SM, et al. Risk of fractures after stroke: Results from the Ontario Stroke Regis- try. Neurology. 2017;88(1):57-64. (PMID: 27881629
  6. Kapoor E, Austin PC, Alibhai SMH, et al. Screening and treatment for osteoporosis after stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(6):1564-6. (PMID: 31018778
  7. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guide- line for healthcare professionals from the ameri- can heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2016; 47:e98–e169. (PMID: 27145936
  8. Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, et al. Task Force of the FRAX Initiative. Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:2395-411. (PMID: 21779818
  9. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Derivation and valida- tion of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the Unit- ed Kingdom: prospective open cohort study BMJ 2012;344:e3427. (PMID: 22619194
  10. Kanis JA, Compston J, Cooper C et al. SIGN Guidelines for Scotland: BMD Versus FRAX Ver- sus QFracture. Calcif Tissue Int 2016;98:417-25. (PMID: 26650822
  11. Dagan N, Cohen-Stavi C, Leventer-Roberts M, Bal- icer RD. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic frac- tures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6755. (PMID: 28104610
  12. Johansen A. QFracture is better than FRAX tool in assessing risk of hip fracture. BMJ. 2012;345:4988. (PMID: 22826597
  13. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reli- ability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091-6. (PMID: 17272767
  14. Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA, Lix LM. Bone Den- sity Program. Effectiveness of bone density measure- m