Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 5

Effects of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees on self-reported mobility, quality of life, and psychological states in patients with transfemoral amputations

Pages
502–506
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: MPK use provides significant improvements in the locomotor capabilities, quality of life, and activities of daily living to patients with TFAs as well as improves their body image perceptions and depressive symptoms.Level of Evidence: Level III, Self controlled study

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (MPK) joint on self-mobility, body perceptions, depression, and quality of life in patients with unilateral transfemoral amputations (TFAs).Methods: Thirty consecutive patients (28 males, mean age=38.5 years, age range=22-57) who had previously used non-MPKs and who were approved to use swing and stance phase-control MPKs were included in this 12-week clinical study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Before the MPK use and after the three-month follow-up, prosthetic use and locomotor capabilities were evaluated using the Houghton Scale and the Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI-5), respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: MPK use provides significant improvements in the locomotor capabilities, quality of life, and activities of daily living to patients with TFAs as well as improves their body image perceptions and depressive symptoms.Level of Evidence: Level III, Self controlled study
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (MPK) joint on self-mobility, body perceptions, depression, and quality of life in patients with unilateral transfemoral amputations (TFAs).Methods: Thirty consecutive patients (28 males, mean age=38.5 years, age range=22-57) who had previously used non-MPKs and who were approved to use swing and stance phase-control MPKs were included in this 12-week clinical study. Before the MPK use and after the three-month follow-up, prosthetic use and locomotor capabilities were evaluated using the Houghton Scale and the Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI-5), respectively. Body perception was assessed using the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS). The depressive symptoms and quality of life were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score and the 36-Item Short- Form Health Survey (SF-36), respectively.Results: After MPK use, statistically significant ameliorations were observed in all outcome measures. The basic and advanced LCI-5 increased from 26.7±2.2 and 24.8±5.2 to 27.6±1.2 (p=0.007) and 27±2.1 (p=0.004), respectively. Houghton scores improved from 9±1 to 10.3±0.8 (p=0.000). The ABIS and BDI scores decreased from 43.2±10.9 and 5.7±6.6 to 37.1±8.9 (p=0.000) and 3.8±4.5 (p=0.015), respectively. Also, the SF-36 physical function and vitality subscales increased from 71.2±24.0 and 75.5±14.6 to 85.6±16.6 (p=0.001) and 81.7±14.1 (p=0.015), respectively. Conclusion: MPK use provides significant improvements in the locomotor capabilities, quality of life, and activities of daily living to patients with TFAs as well as improves their body image perceptions and depressive symptoms.Level of Evidence: Level III, Self controlled study

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, E. İ., AYDIN, T., BUĞDAYCI, D., KESİKTAŞ, N. (2020). Effects of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees on self-reported mobility, quality of life, and psychological states in patients with transfemoral amputations. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 5, 502–506. https://ajindex.com/articles/354382

References (12)

  1. Van der Linde H, Hofstad CJ, Geurts AC, et al. A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004
  2. [Crossref] 2. Theeven PJ, Hemmen B, Brink PR, Smeets RJEM, Seelen HAM. Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013
  3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-333 [Crossref] 3. Sawers AB, Hafner BJ. Outcomes associated with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees among individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss: A systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013
  4. [Crossref] 4. Vrieling AH, van Keeken HG, Schoppen T, et al. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees. Gait Posture 2008
  5. [Crossref] 5. Vrieling AH, van Keeken HG, Schoppen T, et al. Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees. Gait Posture 2007
  6. [Crossref] 6. Genin JJ, Bastien GJ, Franck B, et al. Effect of speed on the energy cost of walking in unilateral traumatic lower limb amputees. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008
  7. [Crossref] 7. Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001
  8. [Crossref] 8. Seymour R, Engbretson B, Kott K, et al. Comparison between the C-leg microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and non-microprocessor control prosthetic knees: a preliminary study of energy expenditure, obstacle course performance, and quality of life survey. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007
  9. [Crossref] 9. Hafner BJ, Willingham LL, Buell NC, et al. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of prosthetic knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007
  10. [Crossref] 10. Stevens PM, Wurdeman SR. Prosthetic knee selection for individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation: A clinical practice guideline. J Prosthet Orthot 2019
  11. [Crossref] 11. Möller S, Hagberg K, Samulesson K, et al. Perceived self-efficacy and specific self-reported outcomes in persons with lower-limb amputation using a non-microprocessor-controlled versus a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2018
  12. [Crossref] 12. Devlin M, Pauley T, Head K, Garfinkel S. Houghton Scale of prostheti