SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) for people with cerebral palsy

Pediatrik Veri Toplama Aracının (PVTA) Türkçe versiyonunun serebral palsili bireylerde geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Nilüfer DİLBAY KESKİN
Mintaze GÜNEL KEREM
Timuçin AKTAN
Pages
118–126
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings of the validity of the scale indicated that it was highly sensitive inseparating children with CP from healthy children (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Assessment of functional health and health related quality of life (HRQL) of childrenwith cerebral palsy (CP) are important for effective rehabilitation practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, thepresent study was aimed to provide a Turkish version of PODCI which is one of the prevalentlyused HRQL scales in CP, to investigate reliability and validity of the scale for children with CP.Methods: Age range was between 2 and 18 years, 105 children with CP, 48 healthy childrenand their mothers were recruited for the study subjects were divided into three age groups, i.e.2-7, 8-12, and 13-18.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings of the validity of the scale indicated that it was highly sensitive inseparating children with CP from healthy children (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Assessment of functional health and health related quality of life (HRQL) of childrenwith cerebral palsy (CP) are important for effective rehabilitation practices. Therefore, thepresent study was aimed to provide a Turkish version of PODCI which is one of the prevalentlyused HRQL scales in CP, to investigate reliability and validity of the scale for children with CP.Methods: Age range was between 2 and 18 years, 105 children with CP, 48 healthy childrenand their mothers were recruited for the study subjects were divided into three age groups, i.e.2-7, 8-12, and 13-18. GMFCS levels, clinical types, demographical and socio-economical data ofthe cases with CP, PODCI scores and also PedsQL and CHQ PF-50 scores as a gold standard, ofparticipants were recorded. Results: Findings of the reliability of PODCI showed that theinternal consistency was acceptable and test-retest reliability was quite high (Alpha=0.93,ICC=0.992). Findings of the validity of the scale indicated that it was highly sensitive inseparating children with CP from healthy children (p

Özet

Amaç: Serebral palsili (SP) çocukların fonksiyonel sağlık durumu ve sağlıkla ilgili yaşamkalitelerini (SİYK) değerlendirmek etkin rehabilitasyon uygulamaları için önem kazanmaktadır.Bu nedenle çalışmamızda, SPli bireylerin fonksiyonel sağlık durumu ve SİYKni değerlendirmedeyaygın olarak kullanılan Pediatrik Veri Toplama Aracını (PVTA) Türkçeye kazandırmak, SPlibireylerde geçerlik ve güvenilirliğini göstermek amaçlandı. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 2-18 yaşaralığında 105 SPli, 48 sağlıklı birey ve anneleri katıldı. Bireyler yaşlarına göre 3 gruptaincelendi. Bireylerin GMFCS seviyeleri, demografik ve sosyoekonomik bilgileri ile PVTA ve altınstandart olarak kullanılan CHQ PF-50 ve PedsQL ölçek puanları kaydedildi. Sonuçlar: PVTAölçeğinin güvenilirliği incelendiğinde iç tutarlılığı kabul edilebilir düzeyde ve test-tekrar testgüvenilirliği oldukça yüksek bulundu (Alfa=0.93, ICC=0.992). Ölçeğin geçerliği incelendiğindeSPli ve sağlıklı bireyleri ayırmada hassas olduğu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, N. D., KEREM, M. G., AKTAN, T. (2022). Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) for people with cerebral palsy. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 118–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/623441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Livingston MH, Rosenbaum PL, Palisano RJ. Quality of life among adolescents with cerebral palsy: what does the literature tell us. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:225-231
  2. Tüzün EH. Yetiyitimli Çocuklar ve Ailelerinde Sağlıkla İlgili Yaşam Kalitesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J PM&R-Special Topics. 2010;3:46-52
  3. Tüzün EH, Eker L, Daşkapan A. An assessment of the impact of cerebral palsy on children’s quality of life. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2004;15:3-8
  4. Higginson IJ, Carr AJ. Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ. 2001; 322: 1297-1300
  5. Waters E, Davis E, Ronen GM. Quality of life instruments for children and adolescents with neurodisabilities: how to choose the appropriate instrument. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:660- 669
  6. Solans M, Pane S, Estrada MD. Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific ınstruments. Value Health. 2008;11:742-764
  7. Davis E, Shelly A, Waters E. Measuring the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy: comparing the conceptual differences and psychometric properties of three instruments. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52: 174-180
  8. II. Özürlüler Şurası, Erişim: 17.Aralık.2010 www.ozida.gov.tr/ sura/12.html 9. Serdaroğlu A, Cansu A, Özkan S. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in Turkish children between the ages of 2 and 16 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:413-416
  9. Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Fossel AH. The POSNA Pediatric Musculoskeletal Functional Health Questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:561- 571
  10. Kerem Günel M, Mutlu A, Livanelioğlu A, et al. Kaba Motor Fonksiyon Sınıflandırma Sistemi Genişletilmiş ve Yeniden Düzenlenmiş Şekli. http://motorgrowth.canchild.ca/en/gmfcs/resource s/turkishgmfcserfinal.pdf
  11. Oeffinger D. Outcome assessments in children with CP, part I: descriptive characteristics of GMFCS levels 1 to 3. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;52:324- 335 13. Gates P, Otsuka N, Sanders J. Functioning and health related quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy: self versus parent perspectives. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:843-849
  12. Eiser C, Morse R. Can parents rate their child’s health related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:347-357
  13. Koning MW, Arnaud C, Dickinson HO. Determinants of Child-Parent Agreement in Quality of Life Reports: A European Study of Children With Ce