Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

İnvestigating of peer-accepted and non-accepted elementary school students' perceptions about peer relations

Pages
43–70
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that despite accepted and non accepted students’ perceptions about peer relations were similar in terms of categories, some of the answers were differentiated in terms of the quantity and the quality of the contents .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate of peer-accepted and non-accepted elementary school students’ perceptions about peer relations in grades 4 and 5.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants were 270 elementary school students in İzmir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that despite accepted and non accepted students’ perceptions about peer relations were similar in terms of categories, some of the answers were differentiated in terms of the quantity and the quality of the contents .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate of peer-accepted and non-accepted elementary school students’ perceptions about peer relations in grades 4 and 5. Participants were 270 elementary school students in İzmir. First of all participants were applied sociometric tecnique and they were categorized as accepted and non-accepted in terms of sociometric test total scores. Subsequently the researchers interviewed with totally 44 students who were categorized as accepted (22) and non-accepted (22) by using an structured interview technique. A content analysis was used during the data analysis. The results indicated that despite accepted and non accepted students’ perceptions about peer relations were similar in terms of categories, some of the answers were differentiated in terms of the quantity and the quality of the contents . Results showed that students who were accepted by their peers tend to demonstrate more competent behaviors in starting and maintaining friendships and conflict solution, than students who were non-accepted by their peers. The results were discussed in the light of peer relations and peer acceptance literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZ, A. B., SİYEZ, M. D. (2022). İnvestigating of peer-accepted and non-accepted elementary school students' perceptions about peer relations. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 43–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/623226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akkök, F. (1999). İlköğretimde sosyal becerilerin geliştirilmesi: Öğretmen el kitabı. İstanbul:
  2. Özgür Yayınları.
  3. Alpa-Bilbay, A. (1999). Effectiveness of a social skills training program to enhance the peer relations of low Accepted Fourth Grade Chidren. Unpublished master‟s thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
  4. Bacanlı, H. (1999). Sosyal beceri eğitimi. Ankara:
  5. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Bullock, J.R. (1998). Encouraging the development of social competence in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 37,47–54.
  6. Butler, J.C., Doherty, M.S., ve Potter, R.M. (2007). Social antecedents and consequences of interpersonal rejection sensitivity. Personality & Individual Differences, 43, 1376–1385.
  7. Campbell, P. ve Siperstein, G. N. (1994). Improving social competence. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Crick, N. R. ve Ladd, G. W. (1993). Children's perceptions of their peer experiences: attributions, loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance. Developmental Psychology, 29, 2, 244–254.
  8. Eliot, S.N., Sheridan, S. M. ve Gresham, F.M. (1989). Assessing and treating social skills deficits: A case of study for the scientist-practitioner. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 197–222.
  9. Gifford-Smith, M.E. ve Brownell, C.A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284.
  10. Gresham, F.M. ve Stuart, D. (1992). Stability of sociometric assessment: Implications for uses as selection and outcome measures in social skills training. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 223–231.
  11. Hatipoğlu-Sümer, Z. (1999). The effect of social skills training on perceived dimensions of social skills and sociometric status of primary school students. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  12. Hopp, J.A. (2004). Recollections of adults who self-identify as having experienced peer rejection in childhood. Unpublished master‟s thesis, Siena Heights University, Michigan. Hughes, J.N. ve Zhang, D. (2007). Effects of the structure of classmates‟ perceptions of peers‟ academic abilities on children‟s perceived cognitive competence, peer acceptance, and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 3, 400–419.
  13. Hymel, S. (1983). Preschool children‟s peer relations: Issues in sociometric assessment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 237–260.
  14. Kaya, A. ve Siyez, D. M. (2008). Sociometric status and life satisfaction among turkish elementary school students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Researc