Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Science and modelling

Bilim ve modelleme

Pages
185–189
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus validity of the knowledge attained is directly proportional to modeling and better modeling increases this validity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Historical civilizations have reached quite an advanced level of scientific activity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even today it is extremely hard to understand some of the works produced by them, and how they developed such technology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus validity of the knowledge attained is directly proportional to modeling and better modeling increases this validity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Historical civilizations have reached quite an advanced level of scientific activity. Even today it is extremely hard to understand some of the works produced by them, and how they developed such technology. The still valid method of scientific problem solving has resulted from an accumulation of experience throughout the ages and helps us to reach true knowledge. Nonetheless people have always searched for a way to attain information long before the depiction of scientific problem solving method. People need to apply models to arrive at knowledge; this situation is also applicable to medicine and biological sciences. However it is hard to evaluate the validity and applicability of data obtained from modeled experiments. Thus validity of the knowledge attained is directly proportional to modeling and better modeling increases this validity.

Özet

Tarihi medeniyetler bilimsel faaliyetlerde oldukça ileri seviyelere ulaşmışlardır. Halihazırda, bu medeniyetlerin ortaya koyduğu eserlerin bazılarını anlamak ve bu medeniyetlerin nasıl bir teknolojiye sahip olduğunu tahmin etmek bile çok zordur. Günümüzde geçerliliğini koruyan bilimsel problem çözme metodu, çok uzun yılların ve tecrübelerin birikimi ile oluşmuştur. Bu metot bize, doğru bilgiye ulaşmamızda yardım eder. Ancak bilimsel problem çözme metodu tarif edilmeden önce de, insanlar bilgiye ulaşmanın yollarını aramışlardır. Bilgiye ulaşmak için, insanlar modellerin yardımına ihtiyaç duyarlar. Bu durum tıp ve biyolojik bilimlerde de geçerlidir. Bununla birlikte, modellerle yapılan deneylerden elde edilen verilerin doğruluk ve geçerliliklerini tam olarak değerlendirmek güçtür. O yüzden, modelleme ne kadar doğru yapılırsa, elde edilen bilginin doğruluğu o oranda artacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, İ., ÖZGÜRTAŞ, T. (2022). Science and modelling. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 185–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/621371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Tekeli S, Kahya E, Dosay M,Demir R, Topdemir HG, Unat Y, Aydın Koç A. (2001) Bilim Tarihine Giriş, s:1-16, Nobel, Ankara
  2. Hull LWH. (1959) History and Philosophy of Science, s:1-34, Longmans, London
  3. Sarton G. (1959) A history of science, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, Journal of the Franklin Institute. 267 (5): 456
  4. Westfall RS, Ronald NG. (1975) Foundations of scientific method: The nineteenth century, Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 5 (4): 397-99
  5. Ronan CA. (1986) The Shorter Science and Civilization in China, 2. Cilt, s: 298. Cambridge University Press, New York
  6. Bose DM, Sen SN, Subbarayappa BV. (1974) A concise history of science in India, Historia Mathematica. 1 (2): 208-12
  7. Gupta RC. (1976) 1500th anniversary of Aryabhata I at Patna (India), Historia Mathematica. 3 (4): 468-69
  8. Rochberg F. (2002) A consideration of Babylonian astronomy within the historiography of science, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 33 (4): 661-84
  9. Dreyer JLE. (1954) History of astronomy from Thales to Kepler, Journal of the Franklin Institute. 257 (1): 80
  10. Stokley J. (1932) Introduction to the history of science, From Rabbi Ben Ezra to Roger Bacon. By George Sarton, Associate in the History of Science, Journal of the Franklin Institute. 214 (1): 119-21
  11. Singer C. (1920) Roger Bacon’s Works.The Lancet. 196 (5066): 721
  12. Atkinson D, Peijnenburg J. (2004) Galileo and prior philosophy Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 35 (1): 115-36
  13. Mottelay FP. (1983) William Gilbert, of colchester, physician of London: On the loadstone and magnetic bodies, and on great magnet,the earth. A new physiology demonstrated with many arguments and experiments. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 13 6(3): 239
  14. Giulini D, Straumann N. (2006) Einstein’s impact on the physics of the twentieth century, Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 37 (1): 115-73
  15. Drobeck HP, Coulston F, Cornelius D. (1965) Effects of thalidomide on fetal development in rabbits and on establishment of pregnancy in monkeys Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 7 (2): 165-78
  16. Cheung OPJ, Climent C, Climent P, David J, Watt R, Watt SM. (2007) A small-scale serum-free liquid cell culture model of erythropoiesis to assess the effects of exogenous factors. J Immunol Methods. 319 (1-2): 104-17
  17. DiMasi D, Swartz RW. (1995) An energetical