Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Turnike uygulama süresi ve klinik kimya testlerine etkisi: İhmal edilebilir mi?

Tourniquet application time during phlebotomy and the influence on clinical chemistry testing; is it negligible?

Pages
85–88
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Tourniquet application time was found as 18.9 ± 9.8 sec for experienced and 37.4 ± 11.2 sec for inexperienced staff (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was aimed to investigate the influence of tourniquet application performed by two different groups involving expert and non-expert phlebotomists on the biochemical laboratory testing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Ten experienced and ten inexperienced phlebotomist responsible of venipuncture were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Tourniquet application time was found as 18.9 ± 9.8 sec for experienced and 37.4 ± 11.2 sec for inexperienced staff (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study was aimed to investigate the influence of tourniquet application performed by two different groups involving expert and non-expert phlebotomists on the biochemical laboratory testing. Materials and Methods: Ten experienced and ten inexperienced phlebotomist responsible of venipuncture were included in the study. The effects of the tourniquet application time recorded for each group were evaluated for laboratory testing. Results: Tourniquet application time was found as 18.9 ± 9.8 sec for experienced and 37.4 ± 11.2 sec for inexperienced staff (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada öncelikle uzman ve uzman olmayan flebotomistler için turnike uygulama süresinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu amaç için on uzman ve on deneyimsiz flebotomist çalışmaya alındı. Elde edilen turnike uygulama sürelerine göre de laboratuvar testlerine etkileri araştırıldı. Sonuçlar: Turnike uygulama zamanı uzman personel flebotomist için 18,9 ± 9.8 sn, deneyimsiz personel grubu için ise 37,4 ± 11.2 sn olarak tespit edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KENAR, L., HAŞİMİ, A., SERDAR, M. A., ERBİL, M. K., AKMAN, Ş., KOÇU, L., TÜRKMEN, Y. H., KURT, İ. (2022). Turnike uygulama süresi ve klinik kimya testlerine etkisi: İhmal edilebilir mi?. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 85–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/621349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Young DS, Bermes EW, Hoverstick DM. (2006) Specimen collection and processing sources of biological variation In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Burns DE eds. Tietz Text Book of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnosis, 41-58, 4th ed. Philadelphia, Sounders Company
  2. Guder WG, Narayanan S, Wisse H, Zawta B. (1996) Samples: from the patient to the Laboratory. The impact of preanalytical variables on the quality of laboratory results. Git Verlag GMBH, Darmstadt
  3. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Brocco G, Guidi GC. (2005) Preanalytical variability in laboratory testing: influence of the blood drawing technique. Clin Chem Lab Med. 43(3):319-25
  4. Health Care Financing Administration/Clinical Improvement Amendments Proficiency Testing Criteria for Acceptable Performance: From the US Department of Health and Human Services: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1998; Final Rules and Notice.42 CFR Part 493. The Federal Register. 57:7188-288
  5. Statland BE, Bokelund H, Winkel P. (1974) Effect of posture and tourniquet application on variation of serum constituents in healthy subjects. Clin Chem. 20:1513-19
  6. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC.(2005) Influence of short-term venous stasis on clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 43(8):869-75.