Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

Relationship between environmental and flora change with mineral content of honey bee products

Çevre ve flora kaynaklarının arı ürünlerinin mineral madde içerikleri ile ilişkisi

Pages
494–498
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Mineral levels changed depending on the type of plants where colonies placed (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of the geographic diversity and plant species on the mineral levels of the honey and honey bee tissues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 22 bee colonies in these areas were placed for a period of four months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Mineral levels changed depending on the type of plants where colonies placed (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of the geographic diversity and plant species on the mineral levels of the honey and honey bee tissues. Furthermore we investigated the effectiveness of honey bees and honey bee products to use as bioindicators for the determination of minerals and heavy metals which carry risk for the environmental pollution. Methods: For this purpose, four different sites were selected in the Black Sea region, with different environmental features in Turkey. A total of 22 bee colonies in these areas were placed for a period of four months. At the end of this period, iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) levels in bee tissue and honey samples were measured by Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Spectrometry Emmision = ICP-OES). Results: Mineral levels changed depending on the type of plants where colonies placed (P

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bitki türü ve coğrafi farklılıkların arı dokusu ve balın mineral düzeyleri üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi, ayrıca çevre kirliliğinde risk oluşturan minerallerin ve ağır metallerin tespitinde arı ve arı ürünlerinin biyoindikatör olarak kullanma etkinliğinin saptanmasıdır.Yöntemler: Bu amaçla Türkiye'de Karadeniz Bölgesi'nde farklı çevresel özelliklere sahip dört alan seçildi. Bu alanlara dört ay süre ile toplam 22 arı kolonisi yerleştirildi. Bu süre sonunda arı dokusu ve bal örneklerinde demir (Fe), nikel (Ni), bakır (Cu), çinko (Zn), kadmiyum (Cd) ve kurşun (Pb) düzeyleri Plazma Optik Emisyon Spektrometresi (Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emmision Spectrometry=ICP-OES) kullanılarak ölçüldüBulgular: Kolonilerin yerleştirildiği alandaki bitki türüne bağlı olarak mineral düzeylerinin değiştiği belirlendi (P

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, A., YARIM, G. F., ARDALI, Y., CENESİZ, S., NİSBET, C. (2022). Relationship between environmental and flora change with mineral content of honey bee products. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 494–498. https://ajindex.com/articles/621236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Conti ME, Botre F. honeybees and their products as potentı- al bioindicators of heavymetals contamination Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2001; 69: 267–282
  2. Staniskiene B, Matusevicius P, Budreckiene R. Honey as an Indicator of Environmental Pollution. Environmental research, Engineering and Management 2006; 2(36):53-58
  3. Ardalı Y, Nisbet C, Güler A, Yarım GF, Cenesiz S. Abstracts of papers, İnvestigation of the Use of Honey Bees and Honey to Ases Pesticide Residues, 5th Black Sea Basin Conference On Analytical Chemistry, Fatsa-Ordu/ Turkey,2009; Abstract pp:211- 2
  4. Stankovska E, Stafilov T, Sajn R. Monitoring of trace elements in honey from the Republic of Macedonia by atomic absorption spectrometry. Environ Monit Assess 2008; 142:117–126
  5. Celli G, Maccagnani B. Honey bees as bioindicators of environmental pollution. Bulletin of Insectology 2003; 56 (1): 137-139
  6. Rashed MN, El-haty MTA, Mohamed SM. Bee honey as environmental indicator for pollution with heavy metals. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry 2009; 91(3 ):389 – 403
  7. Johnson RM, Ellis MD, Mullin CA, Frazier M. Pesticides and honey bee toxicity – U.S.A. Apidologie 2010; 41: 312–331
  8. Şahinler N, Sahinler S, Gül A. Hatay yöresi ballarının bileşimi be biyokimyasal analizi. MKU Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 2001; 6: 93-108
  9. Conti ME, Stripeikis J, Campanella L, Cucina D, Tudino MB. Characterization of Italian honeys (Marche Region) on the basis of their mineral content and some typical quality parameters. Chemistry Central Journal 2007; 1:14-15
  10. Brodschneider R, Karl Crailsheim K. Nutrition and health in honey bees. Apidologie 2010; 41: 278–294
  11. Harries-Jones P. Honey bee, communicative order and the collapse of ecosystems. Biosemiotics 2009; 2:193-204
  12. Murray TE, Kuhlmann M, Potts SG. Conservation ecology of bees: populations, species and communities. Apidologie 2009; 40: 211–236
  13. Bennet WF. Plant Nutrient Utulisation and Diagnostic Plant Symptoms. Nutritient. Mutation Research 1993; 533, 67- 97
  14. Duruibe JO, Ogwuegbu MO, Egwurugwu JN. Heavy Metal Pollution and Human Biotoxic Effects. International Journal of Physical Sciences 2007; 2:112-118
  15. Atay D, Pulat S. Su kirlenmesi ve Kontrolü. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Su Ürünleri Bölümü Yayını 2000; 1513:1-178
  16. Yap CK, Ismail A, Tan SG, Omar H. Correlations between speciation of Cd, Cu, Pb And Zn in sediment and their concentrations in total soft tissue of green-lipped m