Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of different equations for estimation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) – cholesterol

Farklı LDL – kolesterol hesaplama formüllerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
601–611
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) estimations usingvarious formulas with directly measured LDL-C (d-LDL-C)in the Turkish population.Material and methods: A total of 1,478 participants whowere aged between 18 and 80 were classified into five groupsaccording to serum triglyseride (TG) concentration as follows:

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) estimations usingvarious formulas with directly measured LDL-C (d-LDL-C)in the Turkish population.Material and methods: A total of 1,478 participants whowere aged between 18 and 80 were classified into five groupsaccording to serum triglyseride (TG) concentration as follows:
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) estimations usingvarious formulas with directly measured LDL-C (d-LDL-C)in the Turkish population.Material and methods: A total of 1,478 participants whowere aged between 18 and 80 were classified into five groupsaccording to serum triglyseride (TG) concentration as follows:
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) estimations usingvarious formulas with directly measured LDL-C (d-LDL-C)in the Turkish population.Material and methods: A total of 1,478 participants whowere aged between 18 and 80 were classified into five groupsaccording to serum triglyseride (TG) concentration as follows:
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) estimations usingvarious formulas with directly measured LDL-C (d-LDL-C)in the Turkish population.Material and methods: A total of 1,478 participants whowere aged between 18 and 80 were classified into five groupsaccording to serum triglyseride (TG) concentration as follows:

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, türk toplumunda çeşitli formüllerle hesaplanan LDL-kolesterol (LDL-C) ile direk ölçülen LDL-C (d-LDL-C) konsantrasyonlarını karşılaştırmaktı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Serum trigliserit (TG) konsantrasyonuna göre 18-80 yaşları arasında toplam 1478 katılımcı beş grupta sınıflandırıldı:

🔖

Cite This Article

ALPDEMİR, M., ALPDEMİR, M. F. (2022). Comparison of different equations for estimation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) – cholesterol. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 601–611. https://ajindex.com/articles/620792

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agrawal M, Spencer HJ, Faas FH. The method of LDL cholesterol measurement influences classification of LDL cholesterol to treatment goals. Investig Med 2010;58:945–9
  2. Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1–84
  3. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–97
  4. Warnick GR, Myers GL, Cooper GR, Rifai N. Impact of the third cholesterol report from the adult treatment panel of the national cholesterol education program on the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 2002;48:11–7
  5. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2012;33:1635–701
  6. Kinoshita M, Yokote K, Arai H, Iida M, Ishigaki Y, Ishibashi S, et al. Japan Atherosclerosis Society. Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017. J Atherosclerosis Thromb 2012;25:846–984
  7. Mora S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Comparison of LDL cholesterol concentrations by Friedewald calculation and direct measurement in relation to cardiovascular events in 27,331 women. Clin Chem 2009;55:888–94
  8. Kamal AH, Hossain M, Chowdhury S, Mahmud NU. A comparison of calculated with direct measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. J Chittagong Med Coll Teach Assoc 2009;20: 19–23
  9. Krishnaveni P, Gowda VM. Assessing the validity of Friedewald’s formula and Anandaraja’s formula for serum LDL-cholesterol calculation. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:BC01–4
  10. Wadhwa N, Krishnaswamy R. Comparison of LDL-cholesterol estimate using various formulae with directly measured LDL-cholesterol in Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10: BC11–3
  11. Mendes de Cor