SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Diagnostic value of laboratory results in children with acute appendicitis

Çocuklarda akut apandisit tanısında laboratuvar bulgularının tanısal değeri

Turgay TATAR
Ünal BAKAL
Mehmet SARAÇ
Ahmet KAZEZ
Süleyman AYDIN
Pages
553–558
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

White blood cell (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyteratio (NLR), red cell distribution (RDW), mean plateletvolume (MPV), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitoninlevels and Alvarado score were recorded.Results: WBC, NLR and CRP levels were higher in patientswith AA (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The correct diagnosis rate in acute appendicitis (AA) is between 72 and 94% despite advanced laboratory and radiologic examinations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study wasconducted to determine the effectiveness of laboratoryparameters in the diagnosis of children with appendicitis.Materials and methods: Patients who underwent appendectomy were divided as AA (subdivided into two groupsas perforated and non-perforated) and without appendicitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:White blood cell (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyteratio (NLR), red cell distribution (RDW), mean plateletvolume (MPV), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitoninlevels and Alvarado score were recorded.Results: WBC, NLR and CRP levels were higher in patientswith AA (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The correct diagnosis rate in acute appendicitis (AA) is between 72 and 94% despite advanced laboratory and radiologic examinations. This study wasconducted to determine the effectiveness of laboratoryparameters in the diagnosis of children with appendicitis.Materials and methods: Patients who underwent appendectomy were divided as AA (subdivided into two groupsas perforated and non-perforated) and without appendicitis. White blood cell (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyteratio (NLR), red cell distribution (RDW), mean plateletvolume (MPV), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitoninlevels and Alvarado score were recorded.Results: WBC, NLR and CRP levels were higher in patientswith AA (p

Özet

Amaç: Akut apandisitte (AA) ileri laboratuvar ve radyolo jik tetkiklere rağmen doğru tanı oranı %72-94 arasındadır. Bu çalışmada, AA tanısında laboratuvar parametrelerinin etkinliğini belirlemek amaçlandı. Gereç veyöntem: Apendektomi yapılan hastalar histo patolojik olarak AA (perfore ve perfore olmayanlar olarak iki alt gruba ayrıldı) ve apandisit olmayanlar olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Beyaz küre sayısı (WBC), nötrofil lenfosit oranı (NLO), kırmızı küre dağılım genişliği (RDW), ortalama trombosit hacmi (MPV), C-reaktif protein (CRP), prokalsi tonin seviyeleri ve Alvarado skoru kaydedildi. Bulgular: Akut apandisitli hastalarda WBC, NLO ve CRP değerleri daha yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TATAR, T., BAKAL, Ü., SARAÇ, M., KAZEZ, A., AYDIN, S. (2022). Diagnostic value of laboratory results in children with acute appendicitis. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 553–558. https://ajindex.com/articles/620790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adesunkanmi AR, Ogunrombi O. Unusual causes of acute abdomen in a Nigerian hospital. West Afr J Med 2003;22:264–6
  2. Saraç M, Bakal Ü, Tartar T, Kazez A. Apandisitlerin perfore olmasında hekimlerin rolü. Fırat Tıp Dergisi 2014;19:126–9
  3. Graff L, Russell J, Seashore J, Tate J, Elwell A, Prete M, et al. Falsenegative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1244–55
  4. Yıldız T, Bozdağ Z, Erkorkmaz Ü, Emre A, Turgut T, İlçe Z. Çocuk apandisitlerinde risk faktörlerinin analizi. Ulus Travma Acil Cerr Derg 2013;19:554–8
  5. İnan M, Tulay SH, Besim H, Karakaya J. Akut apandisit tanısında ultrasonografinin yeri ve Alvarado skoru ile karşılaştırılması. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2011;27:149–53
  6. Nirajlal B, Gabriel R, Anand R, Sohil AK. Evaluation of Alvarado score in acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Internet J Surg 2007;9
  7. Lee SL, Waish AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001; 136:556–62
  8. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Falzon A, Kan Y. The diagnostic value of neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio in adults with suspected acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Belg 2010;110: 543–7
  9. Tanrikulu CS, Tanrikulu Y, Sabuncuoglu MZ, Karamercan MA, Akkapulu N, Coskun F. Mean platelet volume and red cell distribution width as a diagnosis marker in acute appendicitis. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014;16:e10211
  10. Narci H, Turk E, Karagulle E, Togan T, Karabulut K. The role of red cell distribution width in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective case-controlled study. World J Emerg Surg 2013;8: 46–52
  11. Kapçı M, Türkdoğan KA, Duman A, Avcil M, Gülen B, Küçükdağlı ÖT, et al. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Clin Exp Invest 2014; 5:250–5
  12. Khan A, Riaz M, Michael EK, Khan W, Waldron R, Barry K, et al. Prospective validation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a diagnostic and management adjunct in acute appendicitis. Ir J Med Sci 2018;187:379–84
  13. Sadaka F, O´Brien J, Prakash S. Red cell distribution width and outcome in patients with septic shock. J Intensive Care Med 2013; 28:307–13
  14. Ertekin B, Kara H, Erdemir E, Doğan E, Acar T, Demir LS. Efficacy of use of red cell distribution width as a diagnostic marker in acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Med 2017;16:29–33
  15. Aktimur R, Cetinkunar S, Yildirim K, Ozdas S, Aktimur SH, Go