Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Identifying and solving scientific problems in the medicine: key to become a competent scientist

Tıptaki bilimsel problemlerin belirlenmesi veçözülmesi: Yetkin bir bilim insanı olmanın anahtarı

Pages
109–111
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, becoming a competent scientist needs, abilities and skills such as creativity, hardworking and self-discipline that all requires lifelong learning, searching, and widening scientific horizons consistently

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The scientific method can be described as a multistep and detailed process, in which finding the best question is the first and most crucial step.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, scientific problem should be examined thoroughly in different ways and perspectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, becoming a competent scientist needs, abilities and skills such as creativity, hardworking and self-discipline that all requires lifelong learning, searching, and widening scientific horizons consistently
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The scientific method can be described as a multistep and detailed process, in which finding the best question is the first and most crucial step. Thus, scientific problem should be examined thoroughly in different ways and perspectives. The amount and diversity of scientific data are enormously increasing and becoming more specific day by day, therefore traditional observational biology is not sufficient on an individual basis to understand and treat multifactorial diseases. Moreover, protocols, documentations, information, outcomes, precisions, and considerations of evidence should be improved to answer scientific questions correctly during the scientific research. Because of the diversity of the data and the methods, statisticians and methodologists should be involved and contribute to the all stages of research. Besides that, all scientific data should be certainly reproducible and repeatable. Scientific knowledge is in a state of flux and becomes more complex day by day. Thus, becoming a competent scientist needs, abilities and skills such as creativity, hardworking and self-discipline that all requires lifelong learning, searching, and widening scientific horizons consistently

Özet

Bilimsel yöntem, en iyi soruyu bulmanın ilk ve en önemli adım olduğu çok aşamalı ve ayrıntılı bir süreç olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu nedenle, bilimsel problem farklı şekillerde ve bakış açılarıyla ayrıntılı olarak incelenmelidir. Bilimsel verilerin sayısı ve çeşitliliği gün geçtikçe son derece hızlı bir biçimde artmakta ve daha belirgin hale gelmektedir, bu nedenle gelenekseli, gözlemsel biyoloji, çok faktörlü hastalıkları anlamak ve tedavi etmek için tek başına yeterli değildir. Ayrıca, bilimsel araştırma sırasında bilimsel sorulara doğru cevap verebilmek için protokoller, belgeler, bilgiler, sonuçlar, kesinlikler ve kanıtlar iyileştirilmelidir. Verilerin çeşitliliği ve yöntemlerden dolayı, istatistikçiler ve metod geliştirenler araştırmaya katılmalı ve araştırmanın her aşamasına katkıda bulunmalıdır. Bunun yanı sıra, tüm bilimsel veriler kesinlikle tekrarlanabilir olmalıdır. Bilimsel bilgi bir akış halindedir ve gün geçtikçe daha karmaşık hale gelir. Böylece, yetkin bir bilim insanının yaratıcılık, çalışkanlık ve öz disiplin gibi ihtiyaçları, yetenekleri ve becerileri herkesin yaşam boyu öğrenmeyi, aramayı ve bilimsel ufukları tutarlı bir şekilde genişletmeyi gerektiren bir hale gelir

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, D., ULUSLU, N. N. (2022). Identifying and solving scientific problems in the medicine: key to become a competent scientist. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 109–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/620767

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. J Emerg Med 2003;20:54–60
  2. Lewis ND. The scientific method in medicine. J Natl Med Assoc 1958;50:325–8
  3. Donders Y. The right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress: in search of state obligations in relation to health. Med Health Care Philos 2011;1:371–81
  4. Whicher D, Philbin S, Aronson N. An overview of the impact of rare disease characteristics on research methodology. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018;13:14
  5. Fernald DH, Coombs L, DeAlleaume L, West D, Parnes B. An assessment of the Hawthorne Dale H. Scientific Method in Medical Research. Br Med J 1950;2:1185–90
  6. Carney TJ, Weber DJ. Public health intelligence: learning from the Ebola crisis. Am J Public Health 2015;105:1740–4
  7. Dolmans DH, Loyens SM, Marcq H, Gijbels D. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Adv Health Sci Educ 2016;21:1087–112
  8. Crockett ET. A research education program model to prepare a highly-qualified workforce in biomedical and health-related research and increase diversity. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:202
  9. Brown SA. Patient similarity: emerging concepts in systems and precision medicine. Front Physiol 2016;7:561
  10. Gligorijević V, Malod-Dognin N, Pržulj N. Integrative methods for analyzing big data in precision medicine. Proteomics 2016;16:741–58
  11. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014;383:166–75
  12. Redekop WK, Mladsi D. The faces of personalized medicine: a framework for understanding its meaning and scope. Value Health 2013;16:4–9.