Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Relationship between renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis and serum prolidase enzyme activity

Renal tubülointerstisyal fibrozis ve serum prolidaz enzim aktivasyonu arasındaki ilişki

Pages
567–573
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SPEAwas measured by spectrophotometric method.Results: The proteinuria and SPEA levels of the patientswere significantly higher than the controls (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The severity of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) is the most important determinant of theirreversible progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Prolidase is the key enzyme in collagen turnover and isassociated with an extracellular matrix increase.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimedto evaluate the relationship between the presence anddegree of IFTA and serum prolidase enzyme activity (SPEA)in patients undergoing a renal biopsy.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 56 patientswho underwent a renal biopsy (30 males; mean age45.3 ± 16.8 years) and also 54 healthy volunteers (21 males;mean age 42.7 ± 8.2 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SPEAwas measured by spectrophotometric method.Results: The proteinuria and SPEA levels of the patientswere significantly higher than the controls (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The severity of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) is the most important determinant of theirreversible progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Prolidase is the key enzyme in collagen turnover and isassociated with an extracellular matrix increase. We aimedto evaluate the relationship between the presence anddegree of IFTA and serum prolidase enzyme activity (SPEA)in patients undergoing a renal biopsy.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 56 patientswho underwent a renal biopsy (30 males; mean age45.3 ± 16.8 years) and also 54 healthy volunteers (21 males;mean age 42.7 ± 8.2 years). IFTA scoring was performed onthe basis of percentage of IFTA presence in renal biopsytissues (1=50%). SPEAwas measured by spectrophotometric method.Results: The proteinuria and SPEA levels of the patientswere significantly higher than the controls (p

Özet

Giriş: İntersitisyal fibrozis/tubüler atrofi (IFTA) şiddeti kronik böbrek hastalığı (KBH)’nın geri dönüşümsüz ilerle mesinin en önemli belirleyicisidir. Prolidaz, kollajen döngüsünün kilit enzimidir ve ekstraselüler matriks artışı ile ilişkilidir. Çalışmamızda böbrek biyopsisi yapılan has talarda IFTA varlığı ve derecesi ile serum prolidaz enzim aktivitesi (SPEA) arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Yöntem: Bu kesitsel çalışmaya böbrek biyopsisi yapılan 56 hasta (30 erkek; ortalam yaş 45.3 ± 16.8 yıl) ve 54 sağlıklı gönüllü (21 erkek; ortalama yaş 42.7 ± 8.2 yıl) dahil edildi. Renal biyopsi dokularında IFTA yaygınlık yüzdesi temelinde IFTA skorlaması yapıldı (1=50%). SPEA’i spektrofotometrik yöntem ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: Hastaların kontrollere göre proteinüri ve SPEA düzeyleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha yüksekti (sırasıyla, p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYADİBİ, H., DOĞAN, İ., KOYUNCU, S., ESER, B., AYDEMİR, N., KOMUT, E., ÇOLAK, A., AKGÜN, H. (2022). Relationship between renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis and serum prolidase enzyme activity. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 567–573. https://ajindex.com/articles/620752

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Qi W, Chen X, Poronnik P, Pollock CA. The renal cortical fibroblast in renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2006;38:1–5
  2. Wu G, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Kim SW, Knabe DA, et al. Proline and hydroxyproline metabolism: implications for animal and human nutrition. Amino Acids 2011;40:1053–63
  3. Palka JA, Phang JM. Prolidase activity in fibroblasts is regulated by the interaction of extracellular matrix with cell surface integrin receptors. J Cell Biochem 1997;67:166–75
  4. Stanfliet JC, Locketz M, Berman P, Pillay TS. Evaluation of the utility of serum prolidase as a marker for liver fibrosis. J Clin Lab Anal 2015;29:208–13
  5. Celik A, Birer MN, Kilinc M. Serum prolidase activity in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 2017;36:1827–32
  6. Sezen Y, Bas M, Altiparmak H, Yildiz A, Buyukhatipoglu H, Dag OF, et al. Serum prolidase activity in idiopathic and ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. J Clin Lab Anal 2010;24:213–8
  7. Gencer M, Aksoy N, Dagli EC, Uzer E, Aksoy S, Selek S, et al. Prolidase activity dysregulation and its correlation with oxidative-antioxidative status in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Lab Anal 2011;25:8–13
  8. Luciano RL, Moeckel GW. Update on the native kidney biopsy: core curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis 2019;73:404–15
  9. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Froissart M, et al. Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;56:486–95
  10. Johnson AM, Rohlfs EM, Silverman LM. Proteins. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1999:477–540 pp
  11. Sethi S, Haas M, Markowitz GS, D’Agati VD, Rennke HG, Jennette JC, et al. Mayo clinic/renal pathology society consensus report on pathologic classification, diagnosis, and reporting of GN. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;27:1278–87
  12. Chang A, Gibson IW, Cohen AH, Weening JJ, Jennette JC, Fogo AB. A position paper on standardizing the nonneoplastic kidney biopsy report. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7:1365–8
  13. Ozcan O, Gultepe M, Ipcioglu OM, Bolat B, Kayadibi H. Optimization of the photometric enzyme activity assay for evaluating real activity of prolidase. Turk J Biochem 2007;32:12–6
  14. Yamanouchi M, Hoshino J, Ubara Y, Takaichi K, Kinowaki K, Fujii T, et al. Clinicopathological predictors for p