Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of some biochemicaltests in different blood collection tubes inhemodialysis patients

Hemodiyaliz hastalarında farklı kan alma tüplerinde bazı biyokimya testlerininkarşılaştırılması

Pages
26–36
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, these types of tubes, which are less costly than other BCTs, may be preferred to obtain plasma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Blood collection tubes (BCTs) related interfer-ences in test results can adversely influence on patient outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of samples obtained from RST and Barricor™ were compared with SST as reference tubes.Results: Results of Glucose, K, Urea, PTH from the SST and Barricor™ were statistically significantly different (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, p = 0.011, p < 0.001, respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, these types of tubes, which are less costly than other BCTs, may be preferred to obtain plasma.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Blood collection tubes (BCTs) related interfer-ences in test results can adversely influence on patient outcomes. We compared test results of samples in BD (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) Vacutainer Serum Separator Tubes (SST), BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Plasma BCTs (Barricor™) and BD Vacutainer® Rapid Serum Tube (RST).Materials and methods: Thirty-two samples were obtained from patients after the hemodialysis were included in this study. Eight routine clinical chemistry parameters (AST, creatinin, urea, PTH, glucose, LDH, K, calcium) were meas-ured on Roche Cobas Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, North America). The results of samples obtained from RST and Barricor™ were compared with SST as reference tubes.Results: Results of Glucose, K, Urea, PTH from the SST and Barricor™ were statistically significantly different (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, p = 0.011, p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, results of PTH, LDH from SST and RST were sig-nificantly different (p < 0.001, p = 0.019). However, statis-tical significance of test results was not clinically signifi-cant for the biochemical parameters.Conclusion: Working with Barricor™ may provide not just a fast, clean, high-quality plasma samples, safety results, but also time and cost-effectivity. Therefore, these types of tubes, which are less costly than other BCTs, may be preferred to obtain plasma.

Özet

Amaç: Kan Alma Tüpleri (KAT) ile ilişkili test sonuçla- rında oluşan interferanslar hasta sonuçlarını olumsuzyönde etkileyebilir. Biz çalışmamızda BD (Becton-Dic- kinson, Franklin Lakes, ABD) Vacutainer Serum Sepera- tör Tüpleri (SST), BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Plazma KanAlma Tüpleri ve BD Vacutainer® RST (Hızlı Serum Tüpü)test sonuçlarını karşılaştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya diyaliz sonrası hastalardanalınan 32 örnek dahil edildi. 8 rutin klinik kimya para- metresi (AST, Kreatinin, Üre, PTH, Glukoz, LDH, K, Kal- siyum) Roche Cobas analizöründe (Roche Diagnostics,Kuzey Amerika) ölçüldü. RST ve Barricor™ tüplerindenelde edilen test sonuçları referans tüp olarak SST ilekarşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Glukoz, K, Üre, PTH sonuçları, SST ve Barri- cor™ tüpleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark- lılık gösterdi (sırasıyla; p = 0.017, p < 0.001, p = 0.011,p < 0.001). Ayrıca PTH ve LDH sonuçları SST ve RST arasında önemli düzeyde farklılık vardı (p < 0.001,p = 0.019). Ancak bu biyokimyasal parametreler için ista- tistiksel farklılıklar klinik olarak değerlendirildiğindeanlamlı değildi. Sonuç: Barricor™ ile hızlı, temiz, yüksek kaliteli plazmanumuneleri ile güvenli sonuçlar elde edilir iken aynızamanda maliyet ve zaman avantajı sağlayabilir. Bunedenle, plazma elde etmek için diğer kan alma tüplerin- den daha az maliyetli olan bu tüpler tercih edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, S., TURHAN, T., TOPÇUOĞLU, C., YENİGÜN, E. C., CEVHER, Ş. K., DEDE, F., KÖSEM, A. (2022). Comparison of some biochemicaltests in different blood collection tubes inhemodialysis patients. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 26–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/620747

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Narayanan S. The preanalytic phase. An important component of laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;113:429–52
  2. Bowen RA, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med 2014;24:31–44
  3. Guder WG, Narayanan S, Wisser H, Zawta B, eds. Diagnostic samples: from the patient to the laboratory: the impact of preanalytical variables on the quality of laboratory results, 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009
  4. Dupuy AM, Badiou S, Daubin D, Bargnoux AS, Magnan C, Klouche K, et al. Comparison of Barricor™ vs. lithium heparin tubes for selected routine biochemical analytes and evaluation of post centrifugation stability. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2018;28:020902
  5. Kocijancic M, Cargonja J, Delic-Knezevic A. Evaluation of the BD Vacutainer® RST blood collection tube for routine chemistry analytes: clinical significance of differences and stability. Biochemia Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:368–75
  6. Çolak A, Yalçın H, Akşit MZ, Arı EM, Baysoy A, Zengin MO. Comparison of parathyroid hormone levels measured with serum separator tubes and thrombin-based rapid serum tubes. Turk Biochem J 2017;15:30–5
  7. La’ulu SL, Straseski JA, Schmidt RL, Genzen JR. Thrombin-mediated degradation of parathyroid hormone in serum tubes. Clin Chim Acta 2014;437:191–6
  8. Irvin GL, Deriso GT. A new, practical intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay. Am J Surg 1994;168:466–8. 9. https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm (last accessed: March 2019)
  9. Biswas SS, Bindra M, Jain V, Gokhale P. Evaluation of imprecision, bias and total error of clinical chemistry analysers. Ind J Clin Biochem 2015;30:104–8
  10. Arslan FD, Karakoyun I, Basok BI, Aksit MZ, Baysoy A, Ozturk YK, et al. The local clinical validation of a new lithium heparin tube with a barrier: BD Vacutainer® Barricor LH Plasma tube. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2017;27:030706
  11. Huyghe T, Buntinx F, Bruyninckx R, Besard V, Vunckx J, Church S, et al. Studies on the use of BD Vacutainer® SST II and RST™ in general practice: investigation of artefactual hyperkalaemia. Ann Clin Biochem 2014;51:30–7
  12. Dimeski G, Masci PP, Trabi M, Lavin MF, Jersey J. Evaluation of the Becton-Dickinson rapid serum tube: does it provide a suitable alternative to lithium heparin plasma tubes? Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:651–7
  13. Ng WY, Yeo CP. Thrombin-accelerated quick clotting serum tubes: an evaluation with 22 common biochemical analytes. Adv Hematol 2013;2013:769479
  14. Ucar F, Erden G, Ar