Journals / Türk Biyokimya Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy in Turkey and the effect of the sunlight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pages
129–135
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Turkey specific strategies should be developed for reducing vitamin D deficiency prevalence by investigation of risk factors and protective factors of vitamin D deficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: vitamin D deficiency is a common and important problem during pregnancy. vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy can cause serious health problems for both mother and fetus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Turkey cita tion index databases were searched between January 2010 and October 2019 was undertaken using keywords for ‘Vitamin D deficiency’ and ‘Pregnancy’ and ‘Turkey’ with English language restrictions imposed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turkey specific strategies should be developed for reducing vitamin D deficiency prevalence by investigation of risk factors and protective factors of vitamin D deficiency.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: vitamin D deficiency is a common and important problem during pregnancy. vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy can cause serious health problems for both mother and fetus. The aim of this study was to systemati cally review the literature for studies that assessed vitamin D status during pregnancy in the Turkey and affects of the sunlight on Vitamin D deficiency. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta analysis focused on vitamin D deficiency among preg nancy. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Turkey cita tion index databases were searched between January 2010 and October 2019 was undertaken using keywords for ‘Vitamin D deficiency’ and ‘Pregnancy’ and ‘Turkey’ with English language restrictions imposed. Results: A total of 66 studies were identified; 14 were included in the review. The prevalence of vitamin D defi ciency in pregnancy was 83%, including all studies regardless of time in Turkey. When evaluated seasonal period, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 73% in pregnant women in the sunny period, while it was 90% in the less sunny period. Conclusions: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is high in pregnancy and is a major public health problem in Turkey. Turkey specific strategies should be developed for reducing vitamin D deficiency prevalence by investigation of risk factors and protective factors of vitamin D deficiency.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, M. O., BAKAR, B. (2022). Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy in Turkey and the effect of the sunlight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 129–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/620729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Wacker M, Holick MF. Vitamin D—effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation. Nutrients 2013;5:111–48
  2. Bowyer L, Catling-Paull C, Diamond T, Homer C, Davis G, Craig ME. Vitamin D, PTH and calcium levels in pregnant women and their neonates. Clin Endocrinol 2009;70:372–7
  3. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Guidelines for preventing and treating D-vit deficiency and insufficiency revisited. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1153–8
  4. Kulie T, Groff A, Redmer J, Hounshell J, Schrager S. Vitamin D: an evidence-based review. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22: 698–706
  5. Holick MF, Chen TC. D-vit deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1080S–6S
  6. Holick MF. Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:362–71
  7. Leffelaar ER, Vrijkotte TG, Van Eijsden M. Maternal early pregnancy vitamin D status in relation to fetal and neonatal growth: results of the multi-ethnic Amsterdam Born Children and their Development cohort. Br J Nutr 2010;104: 108–17
  8. Greer FR. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D: functional outcomes in infants and young children. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:529S–33S
  9. Aghajafari F, Nagulesapillai T, Ronksley PE, Tough SC, O’Beirne M, Rabi DM. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2013;346:f1169
  10. Mulligan ML, Felton SK, Riek AE, Bernal-Mizrachi C. Implications of D-vit deficiency in pregnancy and lactation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:429.e1–9
  11. Gur EB, Turan GA, Tatar S, Gokduman A, Karadeniz M, Celik G, et al. The effect of place of residence and lifestyle on D-vit deficiency in pregnancy: comparison of eastern and western parts of Turkey. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2014;15: 149–55
  12. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6,2019). London, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook. org [Accessed 15 Oct 2019]
  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535
  14. Guler B, Bilgic D, Okumus H, Yagcan H. Current guidelines on pregnancy dietary supplements. DEUHFED 2019;12:143–51
  15. Bal M, Sahin Ersoy G, Demirtas O, Kurt S, Tasyurt A