Journals / Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

The Effects of Dynamic Geometry Software and Physical Manipulatives on Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Van Hiele Levels and Spatial Abilities

Pages
338–365
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, both groups have significantly higher achievement on the post-test compared to the pre-test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: The purpose of the study was to compare the influence of dynamic geometry software activities and influence of the physical manipulatives and drawing activities on the spatial ability and van Hiele levels of pre- service primary school teachers in a geometry course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were 61 pre-service primary teachers in the second year of their undergraduate program in the Department of Elementary Education at Afyon Kocatepe University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, both groups have significantly higher achievement on the post-test compared to the pre-test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to compare the influence of dynamic geometry software activities and influence of the physical manipulatives and drawing activities on the spatial ability and van Hiele levels of pre- service primary school teachers in a geometry course. A quasi-experimental statistical design was used in the study. The participants were 61 pre-service primary teachers in the second year of their undergraduate program in the Department of Elementary Education at Afyon Kocatepe University. A total of 32 pre-service teachers (computer group) were trained in the dynamic geometry based activities and 29 pre-service teachers (physical- drawing group) were trained in the physical manipulative and drawing based activities. In order to determine the two groups of the pre-service teachers geometric thinking levels, the van Hiele Geometry Test and in order to determine the two groups of the pre-service teachers spatial ability, The Purdue Spatial Visualization Test was used as the pre-test and post-test. The results of the study showed that there was no difference on the post-test of the two groups related to the van Hiele levels and spatial abilities. Moreover, both groups have significantly higher achievement on the post-test compared to the pre-test.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKER, M., KARAKUŞ, F. (2022). The Effects of Dynamic Geometry Software and Physical Manipulatives on Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Van Hiele Levels and Spatial Abilities. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 338–365. https://ajindex.com/articles/620407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of van Hiele's phase-based instruction using the geometer's sketchpad (GSP) on students' level of geometric thinking. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(5), 1652-1660.
  2. Akasah, Z. A., & Alias, M. (2010). Bridging the spatial visualisation skills gap through engineering drawing using the whole-to-parts approach. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), 81-86.
  3. Arıcı, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2015). The effect of origami-based instruction on spatial visualization, geometry achievement and geometry reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 179-200. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9487-8.
  4. Baki, A., Kösa, T., & Güven, B. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of using dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on the spatial visualisation skills of pre-service mathematics teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology,42(2), 291-310.
  5. Battista, M. (1980). Interrelationships between problem solving ability, right hemisphere,processing facility, and mathematics learning. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 2, 53-60.
  6. Battista, M. T. (1994). On Greeno's environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(1),86-99.
  7. Bell, M. D. (1998). Impact of an inductive conjecturing approach in a dynamic geometry- enhanced environment (Order No. 9832785). Available from ProQuest Dissertations &Theses Global. (304431592). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview /304431592?accountid=15333 Boakes, N. (2009). Origami instruction in the middle school mathematics classroom: Its impact on spatial visualization and geometry knowledge of students. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 32(7), 1-12.
  8. Breen, J. J. (1999). Achievement of van hiele level two in geometry thinking by eighth-grade students through the use of geometry computer-based guided instruction (Order No.9937371). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304547897). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304547897?accountid=15333
  9. Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48.
  10. Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştirma süresince nicel veri analizi. Ankara:
  11. Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık. Chaim, D. B., Lappan, G., & Houang, R. T. (1988). The effect