Journals / Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

A General Analytical Model for Problem Solving Teaching: BoS

Pages
476–500
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A common graph structure that can covers the entirety of aproblem can allow students to construct their own learning while solving the problem step by step.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a general analytical model called Bag of Solution (BOS) was developed to help studentsunderstand and solve mathematical problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to develop a common model for solutionof the three types of problems, a total of 1509 mixture, worker and movement problems were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A common graph structure that can covers the entirety of aproblem can allow students to construct their own learning while solving the problem step by step.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, a general analytical model called Bag of Solution (BOS) was developed to help studentsunderstand and solve mathematical problems. The model is based on graph theory, a topic under discretemathematics. The types of problems to be modelled for BoS were determined by looking at densities of theproblems in the central placement examinations and exam preparation books. As a result, three types of problemswere selected; namely Mixture, Worker and Motion problems. In order to develop a common model for solutionof the three types of problems, a total of 1509 mixture, worker and movement problems were examined. Afterthe analysis, the problem types were taken together, and variable relations were determined, and a commongraph model was created. Since it is an algorithmic model, it allows solving problems both by paper and penciland computer. This study proves that different types of problems (with different scenarios, objects and objectrelations) can be solved using a single model. It is expected that the BoS developed in this study will offer twobenefits. It is hoped to both provide an algorithmic basis for computer-aided instructional materials, adaptivesystems and intelligent tutoring systems to be developed for problem solving and also help students to develop anew understanding of the problem-solving process. A common graph structure that can covers the entirety of aproblem can allow students to construct their own learning while solving the problem step by step.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOKOÇ, M., KÖSA, T., ERÜMİT, A. K., NABIYEV, V., GENCAN, A. A. (2022). A General Analytical Model for Problem Solving Teaching: BoS. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 476–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/620392

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Allahverdi, N. (2002). Expert systems: The artificial intelligence application. Ankara:
  2. Atlas Publishing. Aqda, M. F., Hamidi, F., & Rahimi, M. (2011). The comparative effect of computeraided instruction and traditional teaching on student’s creativity in math classes. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 266-270.
  3. Anzelmo-Skelton, N. (2006). Learning style, strategy use, personalization of mathematical word problems and responses of students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 21(1), 1-10.
  4. Arnau, D., Arevalillo-Herraez, M., Puig, L., & Gonzalez-Calero, J. A. (2013). Fundamentals of the design and the operation of an intelligent tutoring system for the learning of the arithmetical and algebraic way of solving word problems. Computers & Education, 63, 119-130.
  5. Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara:
  6. Harf Eğitim Yayıncılık. Ben-Hur, M. (2006). Concept-rich mathematics instruction: Building a strong foundation for reasoning and problem solving. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Beqiri, E., & Tahiri, M. (2014). An effective use of information and communication technology in education systems of countries in south-east europe. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 91-102.
  7. Berry, J., & Houston, K. (1995). Mathematical modelling. Bristol: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher–pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715-730.
  8. Blum, W. (2011). Can modeling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. BorromeoFerri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teachingand learning of mathematical modeling (pp. 15-30). New York: Springer. Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719-737.
  9. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Lin, S. F. (2006). Computer-assisted learning for mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education, 46, 140-151.
  10. Chen, T., Mdyunus, A., Ali, W. Z. W., & Bakar, A. (2008). Utilization of intelligent tutoring system in mathematics learning. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 4(4), 50-63.
  11. Chingos, M. M. (20